Soil Tumpsen is complaining today because he is not on some all-star team. Perfect example of what I am talking about.
"In sports it is all about results." We can agree to disagree. No it isn't.
Sports are supposed to be fun. It started with the Olympics. There is supposed to be sopme tradition. People are supposed to respect the game.
Sports are not life and death, they are games. Some guy can put a piece of leather in a hoop. In the scheme of things it doesn't even matter.
What the eff does this even mean?
I'd argue that Steph and Klay's mastery of perhaps the most fundamental skill in basketball (shooting) shows more respect for the game than if they were both 6'9" behemoths who did nothing but dunk the ball (although that is completely within the bounds of "respecting the game" too).
"Bad behavior" is such a loaded term in the context of a discussion about the Warriors. All of their guys sport sparkling records off the court, Klay and Steph pretty much stay out of the refs' ways, and Dray is an overly competitive overachiever who scraps and fights and would immediately be everyone's favorite player if he somehow wound up on their favorite team's roster. KD is a bit of a prima donna but he's also hated by the rest of his team so that should be a plus in their column rather than a minus.
I have been about as anti-Warriors as anyone on this forum but your argument against them seems based on sheer misguided conjecture and a bunch of vagaries about tradition (What's more traditional than a bunch of sub-par athletes jacking up jumpers because they aren't as athletic as their opponents?) and them not being good role models (which you have done absolutely nothing to back up as an argument).
They are perhaps the most dominant team in the history of the sport and at a certain point you have to sidle off your high horse and acknowledge it.