Not nearly the same thing. Not a perfect example, but I'd liken them closer to the Mark Jackson Warriors to the Steve Kerr Warriors. Jeff Fischer was grossly misusing a pretty talented roster while McCvay has maximized the talents of a very talented roster.
Evaluating Joerger is a bit tough, because I think he's pretty clearly not using our talent correctly and trying to jam a round peg into a square hole (his offense). On the flip side though, we're an insanely young team with very little experience together where WCS is the only guy Joerger has had his entire tenure with the Kings. So I think it's fair to say he's not putting our young guys in a good position to develop, but also fair to say that we aren't some 50 win team waiting to happen if we had the right coach.
Evaluating Joerger is a bit tough, because I think he's pretty clearly not using our talent correctly and trying to jam a round peg into a square hole (his offense). On the flip side though, we're an insanely young team with very little experience together where WCS is the only guy Joerger has had his entire tenure with the Kings. So I think it's fair to say he's not putting our young guys in a good position to develop, but also fair to say that we aren't some 50 win team waiting to happen if we had the right coach.
In steps in a new coach and turned it around in one season by taking his players and playing to their strength. McVay said so himself, "He concentrated on what his players could do well, instead of harping on what they couldn't do, and put his players in their best position to succeed."
I'm not saying that a new coach could change the Kings into a 50 win team, but Coach Joeger has to start putting the young guys in a position where they can best utilize their talents. The Kings are filled with top 10 draft talent. They should start showing some progress in their fundamentals and undestanding of the game this season. They need to show consistent effort and progress this season. If they don't, that is on the coach.