Bizarro Wide World of Sports Lin Championship

Status
Not open for further replies.
If this entire scenario played out, I'd strongly consider Miles Bridges, Kevin Knox or Trae Young. Young doesn't fill a position of need, but shooting with range is always at a premium these days and they could still try to work some kind of deal with another team to balance out their young talent.
Young is the only choice. Knox is yet another athletic low IQ Kentucky player. Don’t we have enough of those. Miles Bridges is a tweaner with no position.

But Kings might well draft for need again and continue their draft run.
 
If this entire scenario played out, I'd strongly consider Miles Bridges, Kevin Knox or Trae Young. Young doesn't fill a position of need, but shooting with range is always at a premium these days and they could still try to work some kind of deal with another team to balance out their young talent.
I’m not considering Knox unless we are at 10 matter fact I’d chose Jahntay Porter over him.

I’d take Young however over Carter in this spot. Have Young/Hield start 30mpg have Fox/Bogdan off the bench 30mpg 24mpg for Bogdan at the back up SF.

Young could potentially be a top 3 guy from the draft I’ll take that over Carter
 

Capt. Factorial

trifolium contra tempestatem subrigere certum est
Staff member
I understand that people are upset that we are likely to not end up with ideal draft position - heck, I'd love to have a top-3 pick myself and it doesn't look very likely. So I really am inclined to allow people a little bit of time to vent, but there are a few things in this thread that I feel need to be addressed, even with latitude being given otherwise.

Hilarious, can’t post in game threads any more for asking a legitimate questions.
You were locked out of the game thread, but it was not for "asking a legitimate question". Just because you can no longer see them does not mean that your deleted posts are gone and therefore can be mischaracterized without anybody knowing the better. Reviewing your posts, it is clear you were locked out of the game thread for 1) refusing to respect the rules of the game thread, and 2) posing a question - not remotely a "legitimate" one - in mockery of a moderator.

Nah, I'll just laugh and point at everyone who thought "winning culture" was important next season when we lose again
Naw , we will be having too much fun laughing at people like you that thought winning versus these gleague team mattered.
You're welcome to do that, but not at KF.com. Mocking fans who think differently than you do is a violation of rule #1 and rule #2.
 
Miles is like 6’6 with short arms Green has a 7’1 wingspan no comparison
I didn't compare the two players. I simply said Green immediately comes to mind when talking about undersized players that found success in the league. There's a reason he went #35 overall. And that's because he was considered a tweener. But he went to the right team and has proved that didn't matter. That kind of thing happens quite often, actually.
 
I understand that people are upset that we are likely to not end up with ideal draft position - heck, I'd love to have a top-3 pick myself and it doesn't look very likely. So I really am inclined to allow people a little bit of time to vent, but there are a few things in this thread that I feel need to be addressed, even with latitude being given otherwise.



You were locked out of the game thread, but it was not for "asking a legitimate question". Just because you can no longer see them does not mean that your deleted posts are gone and therefore can be mischaracterized without anybody knowing the better. Reviewing your posts, it is clear you were locked out of the game thread for 1) refusing to respect the rules of the game thread, and 2) posing a question - not remotely a "legitimate" one - in mockery of a moderator.

You're welcome to do that, but not at KF.com. Mocking fans who think differently than you do is a violation of rule #1 and rule #2.
This is a great site, but what’s the point of having a game thread if your going to allow differing opinions.

You have fans come in here telling us to go root for another team because we don’t like picking 7th every year.

I will venture out to say that this team is losing fans by the day. You can simply look at the amount of traffic on this site and the merchandise in the store. This was a terrible season and here we stuck in the middle of the lottery agian. Imagine this but no first round draft pick next year. I’m sure I will get banned for voicing my opinion but this team is in a free fall and unless most of the fans wake up to the terrible incompetence of this front office, we are going to have a shiny brand spanky new empty arena in a period of 2 years. No real prospects, no free agents to save us and have probably the best coach we have had since Adelman bounce the first chance he gets.
 
Last edited:
I didn't compare the two players. I simply said Green immediately comes to mind when talking about undersized players that found success in the league. There's a reason he went #35 overall. And that's because he was considered a tweener. But he went to the right team and has proved that didn't matter. That kind of thing happens quite often, actually.
I’m saying Greens wingspan allows him to play out of position. Bridges wingspan is small now add that to his height and it’s trouble
 

Capt. Factorial

trifolium contra tempestatem subrigere certum est
Staff member
This is a great site, but what’s the point of having a game thread if your going to allow differing opinions.
This issue has been hashed and rehashed. Frankly, I do not have a problem with "team-negative" or "pro-tanking" comments in the game thread, but there are many others (it is not just moderation staff) who do. A decision has been made, and we ask that everybody abide by it.

You have fans come in here telling us to go root for another team because we don’t like picking 7th every year.
That did happen. But for what it's worth, I think that those who were expressing frustration with our probable draft position gave quite a bit better than they got. When one repeatedly complains that things are as bad as they can possibly be and they're not going to get any better, one might expect that sort of "you're free to do something else" comment. The way it looks to me, there was poking and poking and poking and poking and poking from your side, and then somebody poked back. Cowboy up.

I will venture out to say that this team is losing fans by the day. You can simply look at the amount of traffic on this site and the merchandise in the store.
I'm not sure that's true. It's possible enthusiasm is down, but that's different than losing fans altogether. I will venture to say that not only does the team appear to be retaining even its harshest critics as fans, but those critics will go so far as to take offense if somebody suggests that they might root for another team. I'm not worried about the fanbase.

This was a terrible season and here we stuck in the middle of the lottery agian. Imagine this but no first round draft pick next year.
I've been thinking about the team having no first round pick next year for a while. One of the nice things about it is that with no externalities to provide incentives for the team to lose, I suspect that everybody is going to get along much better around here next year, and that at least I'm looking forward to.

I’m sure I will get banned for voicing my opinion...
 
Regarding the game threads, I think you are both right.

The fanbase and this board are rightfully in poor shape. There are a sliver of die hards fans left that will line up behind whatever this team rolls out. Most fans are extremely lukewarm, local team, enjoy going to or watching games, ect. There is nothing wrong with being a long time fan or city resident that wants the product to be better, and think it's reasonable to say this team continues to suck / be poorly run / this crap has gone on much longer than it should have, because most of the people still talking about the Kings fail to do so objectively or looking at the big picture.

The game threads are a prefect example. Back in early December, the Kings rode the vets to some games they would otherwise not win. Some of us back then said, we're going to regret this in April and then down the road. We were told by many: ugh you are the worst, can't we just enjoy this Cavs win; look, they are going to bottom out yet again in the spring; odds still favor we pick super high; so you aren't welcome in the game threads.

It's a huge cherry pick by the moderators. The majority of the posts here are often outlandish predictions about draft picks or trades that will never come to fruition. Many of them are made solely so someone can claim 5 years later, "I was right about player X." Over half the posts are "See, I have / had the better long term view." While the majority of the posts are about the future / long term and events that may not come to pass, that was verboten from the game threads for four months for one and only one aspect. If you wanted to make reference to Giles magic knees during a game thread that was fine. If you wanted to talk about the win total, math, or probabilities going forward, you could only talk about the game at hand. To many this is like asking who was having a better game between WCS and Skal, but if WCS had physically caught on fire. It was not permissible to say, "I think Willie is playing better tonight, but we should really think about getting out a fire extinguisher or blanket and putting the flames out." To which VF and others shouted, hey cut that out. I asked who is having a better game. Take that should we let players burn themselves to the ground conversation somewhere else.

The reaction of the fanbase a decade running has often been



When things turn bad, many and VF in particular are essentially



Often the discourse is unreasonable and not objective. Moreover, it's often self defeating. It's not just that folks are standing on a busted dock with few resources to fix it, looking out at a squal and blissfully saying "My ship is about to come in" Since the Cousins trade, the moderators have made choices that are bad for the product / views here. As recently as a couple of seasons ago, the team sucked but there were robust game threads and long next day grade / postgame threads. The postgame threads died because Brick, a die hard of all die hards finally had enough of the crap. At this point, the game threads are just a few pages often comprised mostly of just a handful of posters throwing out two cheering sentences or somebody else's tweet. Compared to 15, 8, even 3 years ago, the game to game analysis here has essentially died on the vine.

So I agree, it's dumb and short sighted.

On the other hand, it's their site and it's been the rule for months. At some point, it's Chinatown Jake and not worth picking a fight during game 82.
 
Last edited:
I am curious what do fans who actually pay tickets think? like do people who come to arena want to see their team tank for 3-4 seasons just so they can enter a playoff after 5-6 years or do they want to see their young guys fight and try to win matches end prefer this way of trying to make a playoffs?

if I understood there are some people on this board that attend games.
 
My two cents since I feel that I've straddled both sides of the argument. On one hand, I am pretty bummed with our draft position. I was hoping we could lock in 5th or be tied for 4th. Winning against Memphis was a bummer.

That said, I feel strongly against the handful of fans here that outrightly say they haven't watched many games, haven't supported the team this season, and then proceed to say that we suck and are doomed and don't have any star players and thus this draft is make it or break it for the next 5 years. I think anybody who has actually bothered watching the games would be pleasantly optimistic about a handful of the guys we already have and how the team is playing together.
 
That said, I feel strongly against the handful of fans here that outrightly say they haven't watched many games, haven't supported the team this season, and then proceed to say that we suck and are doomed and don't have any star players and thus this draft is make it or break it for the next 5 years. I think anybody who has actually bothered watching the games would be pleasantly optimistic about a handful of the guys we already have and how the team is playing together.

Could you give an example of just one poster who has posted something like this? Sorry Mac, but your posts regularly jump out at me because you counter points that haven't been made. Unless I'm wrong and simply missed it, which is quite possible, I haven't seen a single person say they haven't watched many games and followed that up with this draft being make or break for the next 5 years. It's a genuine question, could you give an example of who has this position?

As for the discussion in this thread at the moment, there's a lot of hard truths being told. We have been bottom feeders for a decade and a half. Putting fingers in your ears and screaming that everything will be fine, does not make it true. We've been plagued by incompetence and I haven't seen anything this season to change that opinion.

I was never on the Fire Vlade bandwagon and wanted to give him time. I'm still not calling for his head but you can be certain that time is running out. He'd better hope we get lucky in the lottery, which is even less likely now since we unnecessarily gave Chicago some of our extra lottery balls last night. If he doesn't turn this ship around next year, he'll have us in a pretty horrific long term situation and will undoubtedly be packing his bags. If none of our young guys emerge as an all star level talent next year, and we don't even have a lottery pick, well that's absolutely fireable after multiple years at the helm, and nobody will convince me otherwise.
 
I am curious what do fans who actually pay tickets think? like do people who come to arena want to see their team tank for 3-4 seasons just so they can enter a playoff after 5-6 years or do they want to see their young guys fight and try to win matches end prefer this way of trying to make a playoffs?

if I understood there are some people on this board that attend games.
This is my biggest complaint against tanking. Is it fair to the paying customers? They paid for the current game not the one three years down the road. Nobody is promised a tomorrow. But no, I'm not a paying customer.
 
Could you give an example of just one poster who has posted something like this? Sorry Mac, but your posts regularly jump out at me because you counter points that haven't been made. Unless I'm wrong and simply missed it, which is quite possible, I haven't seen a single person say they haven't watched many games and followed that up with this draft being make or break for the next 5 years. It's a genuine question, could you give an example of who has this position?

As for the discussion in this thread at the moment, there's a lot of hard truths being told. We have been bottom feeders for a decade and a half. Putting fingers in your ears and screaming that everything will be fine, does not make it true. We've been plagued by incompetence and I haven't seen anything this season to change that opinion.

I was never on the Fire Vlade bandwagon and wanted to give him time. I'm still not calling for his head but you can be certain that time is running out. He'd better hope we get lucky in the lottery, which is even less likely now since we unnecessarily gave Chicago some of our extra lottery balls last night. If he doesn't turn this ship around next year, he'll have us in a pretty horrific long term situation and will undoubtedly be packing his bags. If none of our young guys emerge as an all star level talent next year, and we don't even have a lottery pick, well that's absolutely fireable after multiple years at the helm, and nobody will convince me otherwise.
I liked Mac's post not because of the assertion that you took exception to but the gist of those proclaiming we will suck for the however long. Given the team's history they have the past on their side but nobody knows. I have hope for the future AND I expect Vlade to keep his word if the team hasn't improved. (Who sets the standard is a different story)
 
Could you give an example of just one poster who has posted something like this? Sorry Mac, but your posts regularly jump out at me because you counter points that haven't been made. Unless I'm wrong and simply missed it, which is quite possible, I haven't seen a single person say they haven't watched many games and followed that up with this draft being make or break for the next 5 years. It's a genuine question, could you give an example of who has this position?

As for the discussion in this thread at the moment, there's a lot of hard truths being told. We have been bottom feeders for a decade and a half. Putting fingers in your ears and screaming that everything will be fine, does not make it true. We've been plagued by incompetence and I haven't seen anything this season to change that opinion.

I was never on the Fire Vlade bandwagon and wanted to give him time. I'm still not calling for his head but you can be certain that time is running out. He'd better hope we get lucky in the lottery, which is even less likely now since we unnecessarily gave Chicago some of our extra lottery balls last night. If he doesn't turn this ship around next year, he'll have us in a pretty horrific long term situation and will undoubtedly be packing his bags. If none of our young guys emerge as an all star level talent next year, and we don't even have a lottery pick, well that's absolutely fireable after multiple years at the helm, and nobody will convince me otherwise.
Well perhaps things get muddled in my mind too (and I don't cross reference every single poster who says A and says B), but that has honestly been the impression I've gotten. Perhaps comments like "we have no talent" (you can find such comments in this thread) contribute to this idea that I have formed, rightly or wrongly.

I would try to provide some proof but a) there's no search function which makes such things quite hard to do, and b) I don't care that much about being right about everything these days :)

To your points ... do you really think it's reasonable to expect guys to show all-star level talent in their 2nd/3rd season? Personally I think Buddy and Bogdan are on their way there. As we know, All-star selection has a lot to do with team success. Put Buddy Hield on the Warriors in place of Klay and he'd stand a chance in a few years. I also believe we don't need to DRAFT a superstar if we can find a mild level of success with what we have, and I think that's reasonably possible as the young guys develop.

I get that fans are impatient. I too am unhappy that we tried to stick with Cousins for as long as we did, and wish we had committed to a rebuild sooner. But I disagree with your assessment of this season - the young guys as a group outperformed most fans' expectations despite Fox having a very mediocre rookie campaign. Go back to the pre-season discussions and take a look - people thought we were gonna be tanking Sixers bad without even trying. Again, this young team in their first season together achieved essentially as much as many Cousins/KAT/AD-led teams have in the past. I get that adding a superstar is the hardest part, but I'm not prepared to write off the group we have.

From one long-suffering international Kings fan to another (I started following the Kings more closely and joined this board in 2006 - I have never been able to actually root for the team in the playoffs), let's hope next season gives us more reason to smile.
 

Tetsujin

The Game Thread Dude
So why can't we just tank for ONE quarter? ONE
Who the hell were we suppposed to tank with? The only vet who saw any action was Vinsanity. Fox was our only true point guard. The Kings only had nine active players (I’m assuming that if Bruno was healthy he’d have seen some time). Jack effing Cooley played nearly twenty minutes for Christsake. Aside from actually forfeiting the game, what else could the Kings have possibly done to appease some of you?
 
Well perhaps things get muddled in my mind too (and I don't cross reference every single poster who says A and says B), but that has honestly been the impression I've gotten. Perhaps comments like "we have no talent" (you can find such comments in this thread) contribute to this idea that I have formed, rightly or wrongly.

I would try to provide some proof but a) there's no search function which makes such things quite hard to do, and b) I don't care that much about being right about everything these days :)

To your points ... do you really think it's reasonable to expect guys to show all-star level talent in their 2nd/3rd season? Personally I think Buddy and Bogdan are on their way there. As we know, All-star selection has a lot to do with team success. Put Buddy Hield on the Warriors in place of Klay and he'd stand a chance in a few years. I also believe we don't need to DRAFT a superstar if we can find a mild level of success with what we have, and I think that's reasonably possible as the young guys develop.

I get that fans are impatient. I too am unhappy that we tried to stick with Cousins for as long as we did, and wish we had committed to a rebuild sooner. But I disagree with your assessment of this season - the young guys as a group outperformed most fans' expectations despite Fox having a very mediocre rookie campaign. Go back to the pre-season discussions and take a look - people thought we were gonna be tanking Sixers bad without even trying. Again, this young team in their first season together achieved essentially as much as many Cousins/KAT/AD-led teams have in the past. I get that adding a superstar is the hardest part, but I'm not prepared to write off the group we have.

From one long-suffering international Kings fan to another (I started following the Kings more closely and joined this board in 2006 - I have never been able to actually root for the team in the playoffs), let's hope next season gives us more reason to smile.

That's a fair post. I wouldn't expect you to cross reference or make notes :)

I also wouldn't expect the young guys to perform at an all-star level next year, but we may be in trouble if none of them flash that kind of talent. That's all I'm looking for really, I may have phrased my initially comment clumsily.

FWIW, I think Fox may have that sort of talent, he has shown flashes and hopefully he can build on that next year. Buddy has shown real improvement in terms of passing (Bogs may have helped him) and ball-handling, he deserves a lot of credit as that is not easy to do. I also love Bogdans game, he could fit in on any team in the league. Also excited to see what Giles could offer. My issue isn't that I think we have no talent, and no good young players. But this league is about superstars, you cannot win without one. And my issue is I don't think we are giving ourselves the best opportunity to land one. And failure to do that results in cycles like the one we are currently in.

I don't believe we are all that far apart.
 

Tetsujin

The Game Thread Dude
The Kings have no one to blame but themselves for dropping down in the draft.

Joeger could had easily "rested" Buddy, Fox, Bogdan, WCS for this meaningless game, but chose to go full force instead.

The Kings are really clueless.
Considering the injury situations at their positions not really.
 
Teams like the Lakers, and now Mavs/Hawks are realizing that the 76ers way is the correct way to win now. Tank properly for 2-3 years and then come back to the playoffs for years to come. Meanwhile, the Kings will miss the playoffs again next year and we'll have to watch the pick go to Boston. At least we won against Memphis though!
Jazz did not take that route and they are in the same (better?) position than the Sixers. The other teams are just bad right now with them becoming the next Sixers not a certainty. It is questionable whether sitting your draft picks will produce a playoff team without unintended consequences unless everyone gets lucky and have their future stars injured for first several seasons. We will see what happens.
 
Jazz did not take that route and they are in the same (better?) position than the Sixers. The other teams are just bad right now with them becoming the next Sixers not a certainty. It is questionable whether sitting your draft picks will produce a playoff team without unintended consequences unless everyone gets lucky and have their future stars injured for first several seasons. We will see what happens.
Jazz are not in a better position long term than the sixers and it's not close. We will see separation over the next few years, unless injuries come back to bite the Sixers.

With that said, the argument for the Jazz isn't actually an argument against tanking. They did an incredible job drafting, getting two all-star level talents in Mitchell and Gobert at positions you wouldn't expect them to. If the argument is to draft two all star talents at those positions, well good luck trying to replicate that. You're much more likely to get players at that level at the top of the lottery, hence why teams tank.

If you can draft stars at any point in the draft, then sure, tanking is unnecessary. But you're really not playing the odds at that point and you're more likely to end up in constant mediocrity. There are many more examples of teams like us, than there are of teams like the Jazz who drafted about as well as they could have recently.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.