Kings making Rudy available for trade?

Sure there is. If Russel was Kobe you do the deal in a second and don't even think.

However, if Russel is just an overrated scrub in waiting living off of draft position, then it would be disaster. The problem isn't the nature of the deal, the problem is the centerpiece. Just as a hint to everybody, if the Lakers thought they won their gamble and had their next Kobe there he wouldn't be available in trades.
Why even bring Kobe to the table? Of course you would trade for a guy like him. That was not my point.
There are more nuances in the development of young players, than scrub or next Kobe.
So while he may not be the next HOF and potential GOAT, Russel may still be a 6'5 PG with good passing instincts, a jumpshot and solid defense. Doesn't sound too bad right?
But it will take Russel 2 to 3 years to learn his position and because he is not a dominant athlete, learning how to play his position is crucial.

The Kings won't take the time to develop another prospect. From all we know, they aren't even capable to develop a prospect. All they want to do is get into the playoffs.
They signed a bunch of veterans in order to do so. The timetable of this team to get as deep into the playoffs as possible is limited to the next 3 years, unless we part ways with Rondo and Gay.
But you can't expect Russel to outperform veterans like Rondo or Gay right now or in 2 years from now.
So while Russel may be the better choice for this franchise in the long run, Kings will not hurt their chances to win now and in the cmoning 2-3 years, to get him, by sending Gay to the Lakers.
 
Last edited:
Well the only SF they have on the roster is Crowder, who is a little undersized for the position at 6'6". I have no idea if they have interest in Gay or not, but one could argue that he would be an improvement over Crowder. Or not!
For Boston Gay is certainly not an upgrade over Crowder and I would guess most of the league would prefer Crowder over Gay. Smart and Turner are able to hold their ground against most SF's.
 
You know I have nothing to base this on but my gut, but I think Vlade's job is safe for at least another year. I think Karl's job is definitely in jeopardy. I do think that no management moves will be made until the offseason. To fire Karl would look like an acceptable move, after another season of under achieving But to fire both the GM and the coach would make us the laughing stock of the NBA once again, and I don't think that's the mantle Vivek wants hanging over his head going into the new arena.

Here's the thing. Most people on this forum have said over and over that on paper, this team should be better than it's been performing. If you and I and most think that's true, then we must also believe that Vlade put together a pretty good team. Those two things seem to go hand in hand. If so, then how can you fire the GM? If not the GM, then it has to be the coach, right? Or, some players that possibly don't fit, or perhaps don't want to fit, need to be moved. Or both! I could be wrong. As I said, I'm just going with my gut on this one, but my gut has been right more times than it's been wrong. It's also a little too big right now.
I hope you are right. But Vlade's mission was to assemble a team, that would be able to make the playoffs this year. Vivek is not known for his patience nor his basketball knowledge.
 
The question is, whose idea was that? Vlade's or Vivek's? I'm assuming that it was Vivek's, and if so, how can he blame Vlade for being shortsighted about the future? Well, I guess he can, he's the owner. If nothing else, Vivek is learning that putting a winning team together is trickier than he thought. Players aren't like parts of a computer that you can put together and have an expected result. The bastards have the nasty habit of thinking for themselves. where's the Vulcan mind meld when you need it?
We don't know, whose idea that was. But we know, whose job it is to assemble the team and coaching staff.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Why even bring Kobe to the table? Of course you would trade for a guy like him. That was not my point.
There are more nuances in the development of young players, than scrub or next Kobe.
So while he may not be the next HOF and potential GOAT, Russel may still be a 6'5 PG with good passing instincts, a jumpshot and solid defense. Doesn't sound too bad right?
But it will take Russel 2 to 3 years to learn his position and because he is not a dominant athlete, learning how to play his position is crucial.

The Kings won't take the time to develop another prospect. From all we know, they aren't even capable to develop a prospect. All they want to do is get into the playoffs.
They signed a bunch of veterans in order to do so. The timetable of this team to get as deep into the playoffs as possible is limited to the next 3 years, unless we part ways with Rondo and Gay.
But you can't expect Russel to outperform veterans like Rondo or Gay right now or in 2 years from now.
So while Russel may be the better choice for this franchise in the long run, Kings will not hurt their chances to win now and in the cmoning 2-3 years, to get him, by sending Gay to the Lakers.
If Russel is just some guy who might one day be a "good" SG. Might be a 16ppg scorer with some passing or whatnot...really who cares in the end. It wouldn't solve anything more than an eventual positional problem, by opening up a new one.

If you're going to get rid of your #2 scorer, and your #2 scorer is a legit 18-20ppg guy, then the only real things that should raise interest are either perfect fits, or potential stars at a higher level than he is. Basically future All Stars. No point in trading an already realized 18ppg scorer for a maybe we hope so future 18ppg scorer when your franchise player is now in his prime.
 
If Russel is just some guy who might one day be a "good" SG. Might be a 16ppg scorer with some passing or whatnot...really who cares in the end. It wouldn't solve anything more than an eventual positional problem, by opening up a new one.

If you're going to get rid of your #2 scorer, and your #2 scorer is a legit 18-20ppg guy, then the only real things that should raise interest are either perfect fits, or potential stars at a higher level than he is. Basically future All Stars. No point in trading an already realized 18ppg scorer for a maybe we hope so future 18ppg scorer when your franchise player is now in his prime.
That may be true if all you take into account is scoring, even if it's very likely, that Russel will be more than just another 16ppg scorer (but who knows. Could very well be, that that's his ceiling).
Now I know, that you have a strong emphasis on defense. If we take defense into account and take a honest look on Rudy Gay it's pretty obvious, that he is not a consistently good defender.
Russel on the other hand is, just from the eyetest, one of the better perimeter defenders of this Lakers team as a 19 year old rookie. Chances are, that he will develop into a solid two way player.

And Russel as a prospect becomes even more appealing, when you believe in certain basketball trends.
Rudy Gay is one of the last players of a dying breed - a true SF, a true scorer, best at mid range and average at best in other aspects of the game like ball movement, 3pt. shooting, pick&roll, passing etc.
Russel on the other hand fits the bill of the scoring PG/Combo guard, with his pick&roll skills and jumpshooting ability. This is the type of player most teams use as the starting point of their offensive attack.
So while Russel may be only a 18 ppg scorer in the future, he may very well change the way our offense is running.
If you believe, that the scoring PG is one of the cornerstones of a successful franchise in todays NBA, you might be willing to bet on Russels potential.

But as I said - the Kings won't do it for obvious reasons.
 
Rumors that Hawks are looking to blow things up, but just rumors. Mostly Horford trade murmurs, but that's a team with ideal pieces for what the Kings need.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
Sure there is. If Russel was Kobe you do the deal in a second and don't even think.

However, if Russel is just an overrated scrub in waiting living off of draft position, then it would be disaster. The problem isn't the nature of the deal, the problem is the centerpiece. Just as a hint to everybody, if the Lakers thought they won their gamble and had their next Kobe there he wouldn't be available in trades.
Not sure why he is available, and maybe he's not and it's just a rumor. Maybe if it's true, the Lakers have decided to change horses and not rebuild through the draft, but through freeagency instead. They'll have a ton of cap space this coming offseason. Who knows, but I do like Russell and believe he has a great future. I wouldn't put too much emphasis on what he's doing this season. Kobe didn't exactly light up the league his rookie year either. The one thing that doesn't make any sense to me, is why would you trade for Gay, when the hottest rumor is that Durant is going to sign with you this summer, followed by Westbrook the following year. Last time I checked, Durant and Gay play the same position.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
If Russel is just some guy who might one day be a "good" SG. Might be a 16ppg scorer with some passing or whatnot...really who cares in the end. It wouldn't solve anything more than an eventual positional problem, by opening up a new one.

If you're going to get rid of your #2 scorer, and your #2 scorer is a legit 18-20ppg guy, then the only real things that should raise interest are either perfect fits, or potential stars at a higher level than he is. Basically future All Stars. No point in trading an already realized 18ppg scorer for a maybe we hope so future 18ppg scorer when your franchise player is now in his prime.
If your looking at Russell as someone that might some day be a good SG, then you don't do the deal. Russell isn't a SG, he's a PG, and is going to be one of the best PG's in the league at some point. Now that's just my opinion, and I wouldn't put too much money on it.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
That may be true if all you take into account is scoring, even if it's very likely, that Russel will be more than just another 16ppg scorer (but who knows. Could very well be, that that's his ceiling).
Now I know, that you have a strong emphasis on defense. If we take defense into account and take a honest look on Rudy Gay it's pretty obvious, that he is not a consistently good defender.
Russel on the other hand is, just from the eyetest, one of the better perimeter defenders of this Lakers team as a 19 year old rookie. Chances are, that he will develop into a solid two way player.

And Russel as a prospect becomes even more appealing, when you believe in certain basketball trends.
Rudy Gay is one of the last players of a dying breed - a true SF, a true scorer, best at mid range and average at best in other aspects of the game like ball movement, 3pt. shooting, pick&roll, passing etc.
Russel on the other hand fits the bill of the scoring PG/Combo guard, with his pick&roll skills and jumpshooting ability. This is the type of player most teams use as the starting point of their offensive attack.
So while Russel may be only a 18 ppg scorer in the future, he may very well change the way our offense is running.
If you believe, that the scoring PG is one of the cornerstones of a successful franchise in todays NBA, you might be willing to bet on Russels potential.

But as I said - the Kings won't do it for obvious reasons.
I look at Russell as more of a PG than a SG, but I see your point. He could easily play the role of a combo guard, especially if you have a Rondo on your team. I'd rather see him next to Rondo than Collison. At least we'd have some size on the floor. Plus I think he's a much better shooter than his current 3 pt percentage indicates.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
I hope you are right. But Vlade's mission was to assemble a team, that would be able to make the playoffs this year. Vivek is not known for his patience nor his basketball knowledge.
But Vivek is a successful businessman who learns from his mistakes. You seem fixated on the Vivek's past mistakes but fail to acknowledge his more recent actions. He has handed the reins to Vlade to get things back on track and playoffs or no playoffs I think Divac has done a credible job. I also firmly believe Vivek and Vlade have a shared vision for the team that goes beyond April of 2016.

Vlade assembled a team, but he did not select the coach. It appears more and more likely that this will be corrected in the foreseeable future. Let Vlade have a year with a coach and team he has built and see what happens. I'm fairly certain Vivek (and the rest of the owners) are happy with their current GM.
 

Entity

Hall of Famer
Rudy Gay and choice of bellinelli or Ben for aminu and McCollum. We can give kosta for whatever big they want to get rid of as well
 
Sounds like Rudy is drawing quite a bit of interests from teams. Saw on twitter rumor that Clippers are interested in him now. Kings should listen to offers, but only make a trade that IMPROVES the team. Rudy is still a good player and there's no point in giving him away just to make a move.
 
But Vivek is a successful businessman who learns from his mistakes. You seem fixated on the Vivek's past mistakes but fail to acknowledge his more recent actions. He has handed the reins to Vlade to get things back on track and playoffs or no playoffs I think Divac has done a credible job. I also firmly believe Vivek and Vlade have a shared vision for the team that goes beyond April of 2016.

Vlade assembled a team, but he did not select the coach. It appears more and more likely that this will be corrected in the foreseeable future. Let Vlade have a year with a coach and team he has built and see what happens. I'm fairly certain Vivek (and the rest of the owners) are happy with their current GM.
I'm not fixated on Vivek's past mistakes. I moved on from Malone. ;)
But when you hire a GM to assemble a playoff team for 2016 to get the most out of the new arena and he fails to do so, I wouldn't be too suprised, when you lose trust in said GM.
Vlade did a credible job, but also failed to address the major issue of this team - wing defense.
And I don't buy the point, that Vlade didn't select his coach. He had the chance to fire Karl in the offseason. Karl ,or more likely the national media and their hyperbole, gave him the reasoning to do so. He decided to give Karl a go. Karl is his choice to some extent.

And keep in mind, that I don't want Vlade gone. I think he deserves more time and maybe another coach. But the Kings never cared for my opinion. :(
 
And lillard instead of Robinson and klay Thompson instead of jimmer and rondo instead of douby lol
Story of our organization. At least we got Reke and Cousins right lol. Not going to lament on passing on Curry. No one knew he was going to be this good. If you say you did, you are lying your A off lol.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
I'm not fixated on Vivek's past mistakes. I moved on from Malone. ;)
But when you hire a GM to assemble a playoff team for 2016 to get the most out of the new arena and he fails to do so, I wouldn't be too suprised, when you lose trust in said GM.
Vlade did a credible job, but also failed to address the major issue of this team - wing defense.
And I don't buy the point, that Vlade didn't select his coach. He had the chance to fire Karl in the offseason. Karl ,or more likely the national media and their hyperbole, gave him the reasoning to do so. He decided to give Karl a go. Karl is his choice to some extent.

And keep in mind, that I don't want Vlade gone. I think he deserves more time and maybe another coach. But the Kings never cared for my opinion. :(
I will state again that I think you're totally off track. The relationship between Vivek and Vlade, from what I've seen at the few games I've attended and what I've heard from a wide variety of people I know, is rock solid. Vlade did as well as could be expected. To say he failed because he didn't address wing defense, which you call the major issue, is disingenuous at the least. A rim protector who could help Boogie in the front court was the major issue, and we got that. Vlade worked very hard but wanting something doesn't mean you're always able to get it. The reputation of the Kings has been so bad that few players wanted to come here and even fewer teams would talk trade unless Boogie was in the mix. My contention is that the mere fact Vlade was able to get anyone here is praise worthy, and I'm convinced Vivek and the other owners feel the same way. (And this is based, at least in part, on discussions I've had with people who know some of the other owners.)

You cannot possibly know that Vlade "had the chance to fire Karl in the offseason." I'm going to assume Vivek and Vlade discussed George Karl. Since Karl was given almost an entirely new roster to work with, the idea that he was going to be fired is just not realistic.

You sound as though you believe building a playoff team is an easy thing to do. I'll just say I totally disagree and leave it at that.

A little bit of patience will go a long way.
 
I will state again that I think you're totally off track. The relationship between Vivek and Vlade, from what I've seen at the few games I've attended and what I've heard from a wide variety of people I know, is rock solid. Vlade did as well as could be expected. To say he failed because he didn't address wing defense, which you call the major issue, is disingenuous at the least. A rim protector who could help Boogie in the front court was the major issue, and we got that. Vlade worked very hard but wanting something doesn't mean you're always able to get it. The reputation of the Kings has been so bad that few players wanted to come here and even fewer teams would talk trade unless Boogie was in the mix. My contention is that the mere fact Vlade was able to get anyone here is praise worthy, and I'm convinced Vivek and the other owners feel the same way. (And this is based, at least in part, on discussions I've had with people who know some of the other owners.)

You cannot possibly know that Vlade "had the chance to fire Karl in the offseason." I'm going to assume Vivek and Vlade discussed George Karl. Since Karl was given almost an entirely new roster to work with, the idea that he was going to be fired is just not realistic.

You sound as though you believe building a playoff team is an easy thing to do. I'll just say I totally disagree and leave it at that.

A little bit of patience will go a long way.
I think you misread my post quite a bit.
Where did I make the impression, that I would think building a playoff team is easy?
I never said, that Vlade failed. I said he failed to adress wing defense. That's not disingenuous. It's a fact. He tried to sign Wes. Wes signed with Dallas. But Vlade couldn't recover and net us a serviceable defensive roleplayer for the wing.
That's a pretty glaring hole in our roster and even a cheap role player would have helped quite a bit. We took our chances with Anderson, who doesn't look very decent. And we signed Dukan and Butler and wasted two rosterspots by doing so.
For some this might be completely neglectable, because we drafted Willie and signed solid veterans like Belli and KK. For me that's a minor area of critique (giving up too much to clear cap space, that turned into Belli and KK is another possible area of critique).
And for me Vlade isn't beyond reproach, only because he was one of my all time favorite NBA players.
If this Kings season turns out to be just another journey to the lottery, you can't exclude the GM from critique, unless you put all the blame on Karl's shoulders, which to me looks oversimplified.

This doesn't mean I want him gone. It doesn't mean he should be fired. All I wanted to express is, that I'm concerned, that Vivek might lose patience once again.
Now I'm not someone, who has any insight of the Kings organisation. So you probably know more than I do.
 
I'm not fixated on Vivek's past mistakes. I moved on from Malone. ;)
But when you hire a GM to assemble a playoff team for 2016 to get the most out of the new arena and he fails to do so, I wouldn't be too suprised, when you lose trust in said GM.
Vlade did a credible job, but also failed to address the major issue of this team - wing defense.
And I don't buy the point, that Vlade didn't select his coach. He had the chance to fire Karl in the offseason. Karl ,or more likely the national media and their hyperbole, gave him the reasoning to do so. He decided to give Karl a go. Karl is his choice to some extent.

And keep in mind, that I don't want Vlade gone. I think he deserves more time and maybe another coach. But the Kings never cared for my opinion. :(
Whoa, whoa, whoa, it WAS NOT for a lack of trying. If Vlade had his way this team would have Patrick Beverley and Wes Matthews in the back court right now. They chose not to come here. That's all you need to know about Vlades understanding of team needs. He moved on to plan B, that's the way it goes. Now, the team isn't looking like it's totally complete so it's up to him to look at putting on the finishing touches. Vlade knows what's up, don't doubt that for one second.
 
Whoa, whoa, whoa, it WAS NOT for a lack of trying. If Vlade had his way this team would have Patrick Beverley and Wes Matthews in the back court right now. They chose not to come here. That's all you need to know about Vlades understanding of team needs. He moved on to plan B, that's the way it goes. Now, the team isn't looking like it's totally complete so it's up to him to look at putting on the finishing touches. Vlade knows what's up, don't doubt that for one second.
Who said, it was for lack of trying? He tried, moved on to plan B, but Plan B didn't improve our wing defense. And Plan C (Anderson, Butler, Dukan) was a waste.
Overall a decent job, but left the team with a major weakness.
 
I do not remember wing defender being a priority.
I remember defensive big being a priority and lack of guard depth overall.

Belinelli currently is heavily underachieving, but I would call that executed plan B after wing defenders decided to take other offers. Improve position by offense. It did not work so far.

Going from bottom feeder to one player away (wing defender) from being a very solid team in one summer... I do not see how is that not successful.
 
Rumors that Hawks are looking to blow things up, but just rumors. Mostly Horford trade murmurs, but that's a team with ideal pieces for what the Kings need.
They do have the pieces, but if they're blowing it up then Rudy is not a desired piece for them. They are going to want youth and draft picks.
 
I do not remember wing defender being a priority.
I remember defensive big being a priority and lack of guard depth overall.

Belinelli currently is heavily underachieving, but I would call that executed plan B after wing defenders decided to take other offers. Improve position by offense. It did not work so far.

Going from bottom feeder to one player away (wing defender) from being a very solid team in one summer... I do not see how is that not successful.
With most of the scoring coming from guards and wings a versatile perimeter defender is a must have in this league. So I would think a wing defender was a priority for Vlade. He just couldn't get one.
I know most think Karl is responsible for our poor defense, but maybe we have to keep in mind, that our 3 best defenders are big man. So part of our defensive weaknesses may very well be related to the way our roster is constructed.
 
Who said, it was for lack of trying? He tried, moved on to plan B, but Plan B didn't improve our wing defense. And Plan C (Anderson, Butler, Dukan) was a waste.
Overall a decent job, but left the team with a major weakness.

That would be the only way to really knock him for not filling those roles. I was pretty disappointed when they didn't seal the deal with Matthews because the reality was there were no other options out there still available at that point to fill that role. HE didn't leave a weakness because there were no other realistic options available. And he even moved on to Brewer who decided to stay with Houston. If you want to blame Vlade, blame him for not getting that group of players to sign on the dotted line, but his actions show he had almost no choice but to leave that weakness as it was.

As for Anderson, he really is a good defender. If there is any question about this team and it's defense I think it should start with the question of why coach Karl hasn't played players like Acy, Willie, and Anderson more up to this point? He's been a much bigger detriment to the teams defensive abilities than Vlade has.
 
I do not remember wing defender being a priority.
I remember defensive big being a priority and lack of guard depth overall.

Belinelli currently is heavily underachieving, but I would call that executed plan B after wing defenders decided to take other offers. Improve position by offense. It did not work so far.

Going from bottom feeder to one player away (wing defender) from being a very solid team in one summer... I do not see how is that not successful.

Uh, he dropped a max deal on Wes Matthews, remember that whole thing? Then some signs pointed to Patrick Beverley and Corey Brewer as well. That's probably the 3 best wing defenders at their respective positions in the NBA the last few seasons. Rondo and Koufos were going on during that time but there was enough smoke to know that they were the fall back plan.