One AND ONLY Cousins trade rumors thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm a long time member who rarely writes on here but loves to read all the posts. I love this site! IF, and I mean IF we HAVE to trade Cousins, why not offer him to DET for Drummond, #8 and more assets? We get a young big who runs the court, plays above the rim, a rim protector and still on a cheap deal, plus the #8 pick, where we draft another young player plus future assets. Plus we send him to the east and only face him twice. Again I don't want to trade Cousins as he is the best big in the NBA, but let's look at other offers besides the Lakers. For the record, I hate the Lakers!
 
OK so what if the Laker deal can somehow pull in Minnesota - parlay the Kings haul into: Towns, Randle, rest of the reported kitchen sink from Lakers, keep #6, and lose Landry? Anybody cool with that? Minny drops to #2 and gets some bit of sugar from Lakers or Kings (that 2021 pick or something). Minny probably more comfortable with Okafor anyway.

LAL can afford to give up everything in the Cousins deal - they can sign Aldrich or whoever else their heart desires - they don't need assets to lure FAs.
That's a lot of talent, but I believe the Kings would want at least some veteran talent in the deal. Randle is essentially a rookie, so you end up with three rookies for Cousins.
 
Just fire Karl tomorrow, make a nice pick with the #6 pick, win some games next year, forget any of this happened.

OR trade Boogie and burn the fanbase to the ground.

Your choice Kings!
The fact that Vlade is still talking to the Lakers (and presumably others) doesn't indicate to me that he's interested in the firing of Karl.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Hahaha. You'd CONSIDER that?
I will say this for the thousandth time: when you have a young HOFer virtually ANY package for him is a step down. Wiggins actually rather stunk it up last year. Maybe he gets there, maybe not. Not sure I see it. Towns you certainly hope for. Rubio...is dubious, at least at that level.

A lot of people gamble. Its a human weakness, a disconnect in our ability to correctly balance possible rewards vs. current possessions. In short we are over-optimistic. Casino owners know this, and so they rob us blind (not me, I don't partake) year after year, and we go back for more.

Dumping a proven immensely talented ALL NBA center for kids you HOPE will one day be ALL NBA players is the same weakness speaking. Its why draft picks are so overvalued too. We see the possible upside, and it quickly becomes the only thing we see. All the negative outcomes get washed away as we chase that one possible reward. DeMarcus Cousins is here and so good you basically need somebody to be a Top 20 player of all time to significantly outflank him. You pick up kids and you hope, but you absolutely cannot know this. These guys are not LeBrons or Shaqs. The best that can be said is that best case scenario Wiggins and Towns and Rubio is a package which legitimately COULD work out. But it certainly doesn't have to. Wiggins might be an 18ppg scorer. Towns might be a talented 15-8 type guy. Nobody turns out to be a franchise guy. And so the franchise waddles on chasing what it already had.
 
I was being a bit sarcastic. :D

It'd obviously be a good trade but I'd always be reluctant to trade DMC.
I think Vlade is reluctant to trade, but it sure looks like he's going down that road. If in fact a Cousins trade is open for business, it makes sense to talk to everyone, including Minni, Lakers, Orlando, Philly
 
I think Vlade is reluctant to trade, but it sure looks like he's going down that road. If in fact a Cousins trade is open for business, it makes sense to talk to everyone, including Minni, Lakers, Orlando, Philly
Vlade will lose the Kings fanbase as well if he trades DMC to the lakers

Let's see if he wants to start off on a wrong foot...or on no feet
 
I will say this for the thousandth time: when you have a young HOFer virtually ANY package for him is a step down. Wiggins actually rather stunk it up last year. Maybe he gets there, maybe not. Not sure I see it. Towns you certainly hope for. Rubio...is dubious, at least at that level.

A lot of people gamble. Its a human weakness, a disconnect in our ability to correctly balance possible rewards vs. current possessions. In short we are over-optimistic. Casino owners know this, and so they rob us blind (not me, I don't partake) year after year, and we go back for more.

Dumping a proven immensely talented ALL NBA center for kids you HOPE will one day be ALL NBA players is the same weakness speaking. Its why draft picks are so overvalued too. We see the possible upside, and it quickly becomes the only thing we see. All the negative outcomes get washed away as we chase that one possible reward. DeMarcus Cousins is here and so good you basically need somebody to be a Top 20 player of all time to significantly outflank him. You pick up kids and you hope, but you absolutely cannot know this. These guys are not LeBrons or Shaqs. The best that can be said is that best case scenario Wiggins and Towns and Rubio is a package which legitimately COULD work out. But it certainly doesn't have to. Wiggins might be an 18ppg scorer. Towns might be a talented 15-8 type guy. Nobody turns out to be a franchise guy. And so the franchise waddles on chasing what it already had.
Wiggins stunk it up last year? Are you serious? It's obvious to anybody who knows the game that he will be a star in this league...and sooner rather than later. Sure, he's not a "HOFer" but would you really turn down a package of him, Towns, and Rubio for Cousins???
 
CALL OFF YOUR DOGS BOOGIE.

Your dam agent works for you. If you want to be here and we all trust that you do then call him up and tell him to stop with this BS play.

VLADE cant you see this has to end. Its a players league and it may not be right but Karl and Demarcus simply are not going to get along
 
I will say this for the thousandth time: when you have a young HOFer virtually ANY package for him is a step down. Wiggins actually rather stunk it up last year. Maybe he gets there, maybe not. Not sure I see it. Towns you certainly hope for. Rubio...is dubious, at least at that level.

A lot of people gamble. Its a human weakness, a disconnect in our ability to correctly balance possible rewards vs. current possessions. In short we are over-optimistic. Casino owners know this, and so they rob us blind (not me, I don't partake) year after year, and we go back for more.

Dumping a proven immensely talented ALL NBA center for kids you HOPE will one day be ALL NBA players is the same weakness speaking. Its why draft picks are so overvalued too. We see the possible upside, and it quickly becomes the only thing we see. All the negative outcomes get washed away as we chase that one possible reward. DeMarcus Cousins is here and so good you basically need somebody to be a Top 20 player of all time to significantly outflank him. You pick up kids and you hope, but you absolutely cannot know this. These guys are not LeBrons or Shaqs. The best that can be said is that best case scenario Wiggins and Towns and Rubio is a package which legitimately COULD work out. But it certainly doesn't have to. Wiggins might be an 18ppg scorer. Towns might be a talented 15-8 type guy. Nobody turns out to be a franchise guy. And so the franchise waddles on chasing what it already had.
And neither is Cousins...LeBron carried some terrible teams to 50+ wins...yeah, eastern conference, I know but putting Cousins RIGHT NOW in that mix of players is just not fair. Now to be fair, having a stable franchise would be a step in the right direction and not keep dumping talented players for lesser ones. The jury is still out until proven otherwise so all we can base this upon is IF he gets to that LeBron, Shaqlike impact for his team.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Wiggins stunk it up last year? Are you serious? It's obvious to anybody who knows the game that he will be a star in this league...and sooner rather than later. Sure, he's not a "HOFer" but would you really turn down a package of him, Towns, and Rubio for Cousins???
Yes I would.

The entire point of drafts is to acquire DeMarcus Cousins. When you have found a Top 10 player in the world, everything else becomes irrelevant. Anything and anybody else you acquire would just be an attempt to, you guessed it, get back that Top 10 player in the world you already had. You can't trade up unless you pretty much are getting back multiple Top 10 players, or at least one Top 10 player and a couple of elite friends.

And Wiggins is a great athlete with a shaky shot. who put up an entirely average SG statline as a rook. He'll be good, but a "good" SG is one of the least impactful players you can have. He needs to be the full on great in order for his impact to match the hype. Durant took a big leap after his rookie year, but then again Durant was a freak. We'll see.
 
I will say this for the thousandth time: when you have a young HOFer virtually ANY package for him is a step down. Wiggins actually rather stunk it up last year. Maybe he gets there, maybe not. Not sure I see it. Towns you certainly hope for. Rubio...is dubious, at least at that level.

A lot of people gamble. Its a human weakness, a disconnect in our ability to correctly balance possible rewards vs. current possessions. In short we are over-optimistic. Casino owners know this, and so they rob us blind (not me, I don't partake) year after year, and we go back for more.

Dumping a proven immensely talented ALL NBA center for kids you HOPE will one day be ALL NBA players is the same weakness speaking. Its why draft picks are so overvalued too. We see the possible upside, and it quickly becomes the only thing we see. All the negative outcomes get washed away as we chase that one possible reward. DeMarcus Cousins is here and so good you basically need somebody to be a Top 20 player of all time to significantly outflank him. You pick up kids and you hope, but you absolutely cannot know this. These guys are not LeBrons or Shaqs. The best that can be said is that best case scenario Wiggins and Towns and Rubio is a package which legitimately COULD work out. But it certainly doesn't have to. Wiggins might be an 18ppg scorer. Towns might be a talented 15-8 type guy. Nobody turns out to be a franchise guy. And so the franchise waddles on chasing what it already had.
Brick for MF'n GM.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
And neither is Cousins...LeBron carried some terrible teams to 50+ wins...yeah, eastern conference, I know but putting Cousins RIGHT NOW in that mix of players is just not fair. Now to be fair, having a stable franchise would be a step in the right direction and not keep dumping talented players for lesser ones. The jury is still out until proven otherwise so all we can base this upon is IF he gets to that LeBron, Shaqlike impact for his team.
LeBron is a Top 5 all time player. Its even a level above. A player can be untouchable long before he becomes Jordan.

And the Cavs got their ducks in a row very quickly after LeBron arrived. Rookie year he had to deal with some foolishness, but they quickly shaped up. Never gave him great talent, but gave him lots of roleplayers and an absolutely unquestioned focus on featuring LeBron and doing whatever they could to make him great.

Meanwhile we've done everything but take a baseball bat to Cuz's kness. Peevishness, ideology, ignorance, we've actively fought everything he is for 5 years now.
 
Wiggins stunk it up last year? Are you serious? It's obvious to anybody who knows the game that he will be a star in this league...and sooner rather than later. Sure, he's not a "HOFer" but would you really turn down a package of him, Towns, and Rubio for Cousins???
I wouldn't just turn it down, I'd call whoever called and tempted me with it a ******* idiot.

You can't replace Cuz. Just as you couldn't replace a young KG, Dirk, Duncan, Shaq. HOF bigs are extremely valuable, rare, and pooling lesser talent together never gets you what you had. Why? Because legit franchise players, centerpieces, are incredibly hard to come by. You need one. Steph, Lebron, Dirk, Durant, Wade, Kobe, Shaq, Duncan, Webber previously with us, that's what you need. Without the foundational centerpiece you'll always be chasing the few teams who have it, or you're hoping for a once in a couple decade run like Detroit had.

You never trade away such a piece when it's already in your possession, especially in a small market like ours. You trade a HOF big and you end up like the other teams who have. Regretting it for the next decade.

Should ask why a team as historic as the Lakers are doing everything they can to get Cuz. It's because they know exactly how valuable that type of player is. He's the centerpiece. Once you have that, you build around it. They always go after a centerpiece.
 
Yes I would.

The entire point of drafts is to acquire DeMarcus Cousins. When you have found a Top 10 player in the world, everything else becomes irrelevant. Anything and anybody else you acquire would just be an attempt to, you guessed it, get back that Top 10 player in the world you already had. You can't trade up unless you pretty much are getting back multiple Top 10 players, or at least one Top 10 player and a couple of elite friends.

And Wiggins is a great athlete with a shaky shot. who put up an entirely average SG statline as a rook. He'll be good, but a "good" SG is one of the least impactful players you can have. He needs to be the full on great in order for his impact to match the hype. Durant took a big leap after his rookie year, but then again Durant was a freak. We'll see.

Except he played SF
 
Vlade will lose the Kings fanbase as well if he trades DMC to the lakers

Let's see if he wants to start off on a wrong foot...or on no feet
The fact that he's talking to them doesn't tell me he's terribly worried about that. Unless maybe the Lakers are involved in a 3-way, but don't end up getting Cousins in the deal.
 
Wiggins stunk it up last year? Are you serious? It's obvious to anybody who knows the game that he will be a star in this league...and sooner rather than later. Sure, he's not a "HOFer" but would you really turn down a package of him, Towns, and Rubio for Cousins???

I agree Wiggins will be an all star. He had a slow start last year but really turned it on in the 2nd half and showed his potential.

They would never do wiggins, towns & rubio for cuz though.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Except he played SF
For a good chunk of the year yes. But he played both in that chaos, and actually played better as a guard. He'll need to fill out to be much of a SF.

Here's the thing with him though: he's not a great shooter at this point. He's not a great ballhandler/assistman at this point. So...exactly what is he going to end up doing at so elite a level that he becomes one of the true greats?
 
Vlade is the guy making the decisions you know. If that's his plan, that's the way it should work. If he says he wants to draft so and so, well other teams can make that possible or not. But if he says he doesn't want to trade Cousins, other teams are just SOL.
It's funny that the guy making the plan for not trading Cousins is the guy talking to teams interested in trading for him. Plans change, depending upon the circumstances.
 
Brick at this point I think it's clear Fagen is pulling the strings, but he's only do so with Boogies blessing. So what's the endgame if he stays? I'm just worried this will drag into the season and his value will fall because of it. Superstar or not. I don't envision a scenario where boogie starts the season happy if he's wearing a kings uniform. I'm pissed that it's come to this, and I don't fault boogie for wanting out, but I think we're between a rock and a hard place.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.