Assuming we only got a very limited amount of time to turn this franchise into a contender, cause DMC will walk in FA, if he doesn't feel, that he can win it all with the Kings and will waste his chances to top off his career with a title - eventually becoming one of those great athletes, that never reached the ultimate goal.
Assuming the FO saw weaknesses in our playstyle, that led them to the conclusion, that we won't develop into a contender with Malone, but they wanted to give him a certain amount of time to fix thoses weaknesses (most likely: ball movement, play calling and execution, turnovers, transition). They took the first chance to fire Malone and to alter our playstyle, knowing that we would lose a few more games this season, but have a chance to be more used to the new playstyle at the beginning of the next season, able to really have a chance to step into the playoffs. Is it really that dumb?
All those 4vs5, run and gun, nellie ball, junk ball hyperboles aren't what we see on the court right now are they? We saw a slightly faster pace, a bit more pick&roll instead of countless ISO plays and a concerning lack of defensive effort. I didn't see someone cherry picking or a team that mindlessly jacks up shots early in the clock, without giving the ball to DMC.
Question is, if the lack of Defense is really related to the new playstyle or if it's a natural reaction of highly frustrated players, that saw a well liked coach being fired mid season.
Like someone rightfully pointed out - a faster, more fluid playstyle doesn't mean, that you can't play defense. Maybe it alters the way you have to play defense and maybe this is a step this team needs to take next.
Maybe this whole thing blows up right into the FO face. It was a very high risk that PDA took. It looks like, that we are trying to take 3 steps at the same time and to overhaul this franchise as fast as possible.