Padrino
All-Star
It is obvious that you favor Coach Brown, and that is well and good. What is not obvious is what specific coaching skills, playing system innovations, and unique abilities have enabled Coach Brown to "lead" the team to a couple of winning records, or in your words, "turning around the franchise".
Others would note that Brown's arrival coincided with the arrival of a considerable influx of talented players and the off-season (pre-Brown) development of others. The appearance of Brown and the improvement of the Kings may have been happenstance rather than coaching genius. He has one year to prove that he is more a genius rather than a hindrance to further Kings' progress. It appears that the management of the Kings agree...and they have far more insight and knowledge of the situation than members of a forum.
What a joke. Pay the man his money. When your franchise has posted only 10 winning seasons out of 39 in its entire history in the city of Sacramento, and when your franchise has a history of ineptitude that comes complete with its own hashtag, you don't get to be precious or choosy about how you want to win. Children were born, grew up, and learned to drive between this franchise's last two playoff appearances. There were 11 other head coaches in that span, none of whom sniffed .500 before Mike Brown showed up.
Of course Brown isn't solely responsible for the Kings' winning records these last two seasons, but guess what? There isn't a coach in the league who is solely responsible for his team's success. There isn't a coach in the league who doesn't need star talent on his roster in order to reach the playoffs. Mike Brown and his staff have worked tremendously hard to change the losing culture in Sacramento. Genius? Happenstance? Somewhere in between? I honestly don't give a sh*t. Again: 10 winning seasons out of 39. Mike Brown shows up and has 2 winning seasons out of 2 as a head coach of this team. Odds are he had something to do with it. Pay. The. Man. His. Money.