Woj: Kings, Mike Brown table contract discussions, far apart on deal

Status
Not open for further replies.

hrdboild

Moloch in whom I dream Angels!
Staff member
Some quite astute and insightful observations about the NBA and coaching in this post. It generates a general agreement.

Regretfully, my posts seem to be unclear regarding the status of Coach Brown. Simply put, Brown needs to develop as a head coach. Thus, what needs to be done regarding Brown can only be done by Brown. If he cannot, or is not willing, to open his mind to alternate techniques, positive instructional skills, player management, and general philosophy, then the Kings are likely to stagnate beyond just this past season. A need for a freshened approach is apparent, be it Brown or a replacement.

Brown deserves a third year to prove that he has the skills, or develops the skills, to guide the team to a higher plateau. Management and I agree (a rarity) that more proof is needed that Brown can conduct the orchestra that is the Kings. So we differ in that "coaching for his job" seems entirely reasonable in my view. In fact, coaching for his job may be an incentive to prove he deserves the job and the rewards it offers.

The fourth year being optional for both parties is an advantage for Brown should the Kings show outstanding growth. The Kings then could justify a sizeable pay increase that would insulate Brown as the Kings' head coach. It is a gamble to be sure but worth taking in my opinion.

For the fourth contract year, management has the opportunity to enact change should the third season continue the disappointment and stagnation of the second season. An extension now nullifies that advantage.

Those that fear losing Brown after a "lame duck" season would be a catastrophe might recall that the Kings were looking for a coach when Brown was hired. He could have been passed over for another candidate. Unfortunately, management deferred to the tired "coaching carousel" instead of looking for fresh opportunities, in my opinion.

If Brown is hired away then the Kings, and fans, will have a clear glimpse of his worth should he be wildly successful in a different head coaching position. Of course, then it will be too late, as many would point out.

Monte's contribution to the growth of the Kings has not been entirely overlooked but has not received much attention after the "run it back" season's results. His position provides the talent and somewhat drives the direction of the team. Coach Brown is either burdened or elevated by the skill of the players provided. The elevation of the first year was evident but it was not further developed the second year by either Monte or Coach Brown. Depending on Monte's contract, there may be questions asked about his effectiveness if the Kings begin to degrade.

Final thought: I hope each and every situation works out positively for the Kings' franchise.
Be honest, you used AI to write this post didn't you?
 
Denver... uhh what? Team just won a title with the undisputed best player in the world, just a season ago. They're a better roster
-OKC and Minny have clearly jumped us. Can't really dispute the talent difference
-Your argument for Philly is bad. Of course if you take an mvp player off their squad, they're worse than us. It's closer than the above 3, but Philly is still better.
-Knicks fully healthy are more talented than us. Could say they may never be healthy, but I don't think you can dispute that.
-Cavs fully healthy is close, but them having 4 premium starters with Mitchell being better than Domas and Fox, I would put them ahead.
-Boston is one of the most talented rosters ever assembled lol. Their point differential is historically great.
I told you appart from Boston ... They are by far the best squad at this moment in the NBA ...
May point about Denver was that when the project with Jokic and Murray started they were not anywhere near the level they are ... if my memory is good they missed the play-offs in the first couple of seasons ... but we are in that postition now , who knows maybe in the next 5 year we will do whatever they did ?
For Phily - they don't have talanted squad - they have one STAR ... and maybe one rising star (maxey)
Knick , cavs , wolves and okc i trully dont see what they have more then us ... Domas and Fox are among the top 10 best duos in the league 100% , Murray is one of the good level rising stars , Monk is the best 6th player , my apologies to the oficial pick , you have the beloved vet , an ''elite'' shooter who just happen to have the worst season in his life (huerter) and one elite defender who is just rising on the scene (ellis)
That is not bad potential , isn't it ???
 
TBH, it would be a difficult ask to get your boss to give you a double your salary raise right after you missed a major goal for your job, of making the playoffs. That would mean that 16 coaches did a better job than MB this year and I’m pretty sure a $9 mil/year contract would put him in the upper half of coaches salary.

MB is a good coach and he does deserve a new contract. So they should just meet somewhere in the middle, ie 3 years guaranteed at $8.5 mil and $10.0 mil with achievable bonuses (ie make the playoffs and get the $10mil).
 
I told you appart from Boston ... They are by far the best squad at this moment in the NBA ...
May point about Denver was that when the project with Jokic and Murray started they were not anywhere near the level they are ... if my memory is good they missed the play-offs in the first couple of seasons ... but we are in that postition now , who knows maybe in the next 5 year we will do whatever they did ?
For Phily - they don't have talanted squad - they have one STAR ... and maybe one rising star (maxey)
Knick , cavs , wolves and okc i trully dont see what they have more then us ... Domas and Fox are among the top 10 best duos in the league 100% , Murray is one of the good level rising stars , Monk is the best 6th player , my apologies to the oficial pick , you have the beloved vet , an ''elite'' shooter who just happen to have the worst season in his life (huerter) and one elite defender who is just rising on the scene (ellis)
That is not bad potential , isn't it ???
Did I say we were bad? No

I asked you what teams were more talented than. Us being better than Denver 5 years ago doesn't matter now does it?
-Philly does have a talented team with an MVP. Not sure what your point is there. If they didn't have Embiid, we'd be better than them. They do have Embiid, so they're better than us.
-Did you watch the playoffs? All 4 of the Knicks/Cavs/Wolves/OKC played extremely well with high end elite stars and quality depth. I think we're close-ish to NYK/CLE, but OKC and Minny clearly have jumped over us by a country mile.
 
Did I say we were bad? No

I asked you what teams were more talented than. Us being better than Denver 5 years ago doesn't matter now does it?
-Philly does have a talented team with an MVP. Not sure what your point is there. If they didn't have Embiid, we'd be better than them. They do have Embiid, so they're better than us.
-Did you watch the playoffs? All 4 of the Knicks/Cavs/Wolves/OKC played extremely well with high end elite stars and quality depth. I think we're close-ish to NYK/CLE, but OKC and Minny clearly have jumped over us by a country mile.
Watched just some of the West games , East are too early for me , when we are not involved in such game ...
But i will stop here cause otherwise we will have to make a separate thread for our conversation only :)
For me all those 5 teams arent ''more talanted'' then King - 76,NY,Cavs,Wolves,OKC ... Simply my opinion
For Denver - this is more like hard work and stick together then pure talant , but yes at this point they are way ahead of us
 
The Kings and Mike Brown are involved in a contract negotiation. No one ever accepts the first offer and seldom is that the best offer. He should be compensated retroactively for making the Playoffs the previous season and continued success this past season (Though less than expected). Somewhere around 30 for 3 which should include incentives IMO.

The Incentives should be tiered. +.500 record, steady gains on winning percentage at home AND on the road. Free throw percentage should be discussed:) IMO, whats measured is managed and Mike Brown and staff should start managing those things THIS summer. IMO improvement starts with Coaching.

The Players and Front Office have to do their part to make it happen. The players should be held accountable to put in the work. Of course McNair and crew need to improve the squad without mortgaging the future.

Vivek should pay the man, but do it wisely.
 

dude12

Hall of Famer
It’s believed the leak on the “fair” offer came from Brown camp indirectly so as to put pressure on ownership. Really don’t like the negotiations to be in the public eye…..things could go wrong. Just get it done on both sides already. Then go to work on improving the roster. Kings are primed to make a jump with the right roster moves and less injuries luck this coming year AND getting Monk back AND bringing Brown back.
 
Would you characterize Popovich and Spoelstra as player empowerment coaches?
Yep, they play to the players strengths rather than approaching basketball as a set ideology in terms of "how it's played if you want to win". That's what I mean by player empowerment. Pop in recent years has shown he'll change based around his personnel. Joerger was a little more set in terms of what he wanted. Hence why when Buddy dragged his team back by bombing 3's, Joerger was already halfway out to the floor to yell at Buddy as Buddy just save dthe teams butt on the biggest one and Joerger then proceeded to run him down, hahaha. I get it, it wasn't the play but man, Buddy's Buddy. At the start Joerger had Vlade bring in Hill and Randolph and they got way too much of the pie.
 
Vivek and Co about to get the bag with the new media deal and then whatever the expansions fees are, and he's quibbling, publicly, over a few million? JFC
This obviously isn't about the money, it's about messaging and pressure to win. The Kings love those bonuses. Personally? I hate them. I thought it was Vlade doing that, but clearly not. Someone, maybe Vivek, thinks those incentives actually work. This isn't the tech industry based on commissions bro, lol. The NBA is built on a narrative, as untrue as it may be, that your franchise is like "family". That's why players get so hurt when they do get traded.
 
TBH, it would be a difficult ask to get your boss to give you a double your salary raise right after you missed a major goal for your job, of making the playoffs. That would mean that 16 coaches did a better job than MB this year and I’m pretty sure a $9 mil/year contract would put him in the upper half of coaches salary.

MB is a good coach and he does deserve a new contract. So they should just meet somewhere in the middle, ie 3 years guaranteed at $8.5 mil and $10.0 mil with achievable bonuses (ie make the playoffs and get the $10mil).
Very true, but is that HIS fault? Or the person putting his team together? When teams around you add talent and you drop? It's a pretty easy call as to what happened unless your team has major injuries which the Kings really didn't. Towards the end they did but the Kings drop started long before that.
 
All this hullabaloo over a few mil? Pay Mike Brown and get on his ass. Vivek somehow finds a way to mess the vibes.
Yeesh, this is a bargain.

If there’s reticence on ownership’s side to commit to this, I speculate that ownership wants the flexibility to rebuild the team entirely in the next couple of years.

You don’t need a veteren coach to stockpile draft picks
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
It’s believed the leak on the “fair” offer came from Brown camp indirectly so as to put pressure on ownership. Really don’t like the negotiations to be in the public eye…..things could go wrong. Just get it done on both sides already. Then go to work on improving the roster. Kings are primed to make a jump with the right roster moves and less injuries luck this coming year AND getting Monk back AND bringing Brown back.
TBH I think Brown and his camp suck for doing this. He did sign a contract at what he thought was a fair price and the market completely blew up and now he's not getting market value. The Kings should correct that.

Both sides look like crap here.

I was never on the fire Brown promote Jordi train but it does suck that option is off the table because if Brown is leaking it to make the Kings look bad I find that disgusting. Especially for an org that's done well to stop leaks since we got rid of Brandon Williams and Dave Joerger.

Probably just me showing my age, but you're as good as your word and to me a signed contract is your word.
 
TBH I think Brown and his camp suck for doing this. He did sign a contract at what he thought was a fair price and the market completely blew up and now he's not getting market value. The Kings should correct that.

Both sides look like crap here.

I was never on the fire Brown promote Jordi train but it does suck that option is off the table because if Brown is leaking it to make the Kings look bad I find that disgusting. Especially for an org that's done well to stop leaks since we got rid of Brandon Williams and Dave Joerger.

Probably just me showing my age, but you're as good as your word and to me a signed contract is your word.
Eh, I think leaks are fair game. These guys are public figures, inevitably they're going to use public leverage to negotiate, who's to say which side is leaking what?
 
TBH I think Brown and his camp suck for doing this. He did sign a contract at what he thought was a fair price and the market completely blew up and now he's not getting market value. The Kings should correct that.

Both sides look like crap here.

I was never on the fire Brown promote Jordi train but it does suck that option is off the table because if Brown is leaking it to make the Kings look bad I find that disgusting. Especially for an org that's done well to stop leaks since we got rid of Brandon Williams and Dave Joerger.

Probably just me showing my age, but you're as good as your word and to me a signed contract is your word.
Business sucks period.
 
Eh, I think leaks are fair game. These guys are public figures, inevitably they're going to use public leverage to negotiate, who's to say which side is leaking what?
It's not hard when they kind of only benefit one side unless these are CIA level tactics, haha. This is an attempt at making the Kings look cheap. This Shams leak makes it look like the Kings are saying they aren't cheap, but as a retread on his last option who came back from the bottom Brown needs to just earn his money by doing A, B, C, or whatever. Again, I hate the idea of using money to incentivize anyone involved in the ridiculously overpaid world of the NBA. All it could do IMO is breed bad thoughts. Like when they put that 3 point makes per season bonus or whatever it was into Buddy's deal. Really? Gee, you just literally created a scenario where it would financially unwise for Buddy to not take bad shots. Stupid. Whoever is putting those kind of deals together is obviously still involved with the organization in a major capacity. We'd have to see what the bonuses for Brown are but if it disrupts the integrity of the game it might disrupt your ability to WIN games.
 
TBH, it would be a difficult ask to get your boss to give you a double your salary raise right after you missed a major goal for your job, of making the playoffs. That would mean that 16 coaches did a better job than MB this year and I’m pretty sure a $9 mil/year contract would put him in the upper half of coaches salary.
.
Typically leadership roles have a lot of compensation tied up in bonuses that are dependent on the overall success of the business. When the business does well, you do well, even if your particular division didn't accomplish all it's objectives.

With the business of the Kings due to get around a $100 million increase in revenue (separate from player salaries), the business is doing well, and that would typically be used to motivate an organizations leaders
 
It's not hard when they kind of only benefit one side unless these are CIA level tactics, haha. This is an attempt at making the Kings look cheap. This Shams leak makes it look like the Kings are saying they aren't cheap, but as a retread on his last option who came back from the bottom Brown needs to just earn his money by doing A, B, C, or whatever. Again, I hate the idea of using money to incentivize anyone involved in the ridiculously overpaid world of the NBA. All it could do IMO is breed bad thoughts. Like when they put that 3 point makes per season bonus or whatever it was into Buddy's deal. Really? Gee, you just literally created a scenario where it would financially unwise for Buddy to not take bad shots. Stupid. Whoever is putting those kind of deals together is obviously still involved with the organization in a major capacity. We'd have to see what the bonuses for Brown are but if it disrupts the integrity of the game it might disrupt your ability to WIN games.
Buddy would be the other recent example of negotiating in public, and that didn't bother me either.

Competition needs stakes, and money is pretty effective at motivating competitive people. And everyone in the NBA is a competitive person
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
Eh, I think leaks are fair game. These guys are public figures, inevitably they're going to use public leverage to negotiate, who's to say which side is leaking what?
So I think it's tacky AF. But my primary objection in this case is the way it was leaked is in a way that sounds like it's coming from the Kings camp and they are just totally out of touch with market value when (if it really is coming from Brown) it's being done to get leverage by making the Kings camp look and sound stupid by leaking a totally outrageous under-market contract offer as "fair" or generous.

I dunno, again like I said I might just be showing my age, Brown signed a contract that he thought was fair. The Kings should happily adjust it. But doing this makes him the bad guy, not them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.