Some quite astute and insightful observations about the NBA and coaching in this post. It generates a general agreement.
Regretfully, my posts seem to be unclear regarding the status of Coach Brown. Simply put, Brown needs to develop as a head coach. Thus, what needs to be done regarding Brown can only be done by Brown. If he cannot, or is not willing, to open his mind to alternate techniques, positive instructional skills, player management, and general philosophy, then the Kings are likely to stagnate beyond just this past season. A need for a freshened approach is apparent, be it Brown or a replacement.
Brown deserves a third year to prove that he has the skills, or develops the skills, to guide the team to a higher plateau. Management and I agree (a rarity) that more proof is needed that Brown can conduct the orchestra that is the Kings. So we differ in that "coaching for his job" seems entirely reasonable in my view. In fact, coaching for his job may be an incentive to prove he deserves the job and the rewards it offers.
The fourth year being optional for both parties is an advantage for Brown should the Kings show outstanding growth. The Kings then could justify a sizeable pay increase that would insulate Brown as the Kings' head coach. It is a gamble to be sure but worth taking in my opinion.
For the fourth contract year, management has the opportunity to enact change should the third season continue the disappointment and stagnation of the second season. An extension now nullifies that advantage.
Those that fear losing Brown after a "lame duck" season would be a catastrophe might recall that the Kings were looking for a coach when Brown was hired. He could have been passed over for another candidate. Unfortunately, management deferred to the tired "coaching carousel" instead of looking for fresh opportunities, in my opinion.
If Brown is hired away then the Kings, and fans, will have a clear glimpse of his worth should he be wildly successful in a different head coaching position. Of course, then it will be too late, as many would point out.
Monte's contribution to the growth of the Kings has not been entirely overlooked but has not received much attention after the "run it back" season's results. His position provides the talent and somewhat drives the direction of the team. Coach Brown is either burdened or elevated by the skill of the players provided. The elevation of the first year was evident but it was not further developed the second year by either Monte or Coach Brown. Depending on Monte's contract, there may be questions asked about his effectiveness if the Kings begin to degrade.
Final thought: I hope each and every situation works out positively for the Kings' franchise.