Whos better?

Man, those two were good players too. If they were playing today, they'd be stars.

Richardson career 15, 6, 7, 2.5 steals
Lever career 14, 6, 6, 2.2 steals

I'd have to go with Lever because Richardson was plagued by cocaine use, although he was compared favorably to Magic Johnson at his best (and those comparisons actually weren't hype). Lever was probably the most consistent triple double guy in the league other than Magic for a handful of years.

How bout Terry Cummings or Anthony Mason?
 
Last edited:
I'd like to think that bibby is continuing to develop. (ergo 2004 > 2000)


Mike Bibby's "D" versus Jason William's "D"

neither is a defensive stalwart, but who is less bad? Why do you think so?
 
Ryan@CU said:
Catrer is a injured bum! I'd take Peja over Carter in the last 3 years.
I think he's a slightly better player than Peja: 23/5/4 career vs 18/5/2. I do, however, think Carter has never fully tapped his potential.
 
I'm not sure if Peja is really a good idea for the Kings anymore...seeing how he doesn't want to be there at all. Why hold onto someone who will just bring everyone else down?
 

Ryan

I like turtles
PJAZZ19 said:
I'm not sure if Peja is really a good idea for the Kings anymore...seeing how he doesn't want to be there at all. Why hold onto someone who will just bring everyone else down?
Give me an example where this has happened in the NBA