TaxMan
Starter
It is a tough argument since Fox is the closest thing we have to a superstar, but if the consensus is that this team is failing because its poorly constructed from a balanced roster perspective, then I could see the right move possibly being a slight step back this year but taking two steps forward next year. That’s a big gamble on whether you can turn Fox into say Amen and Reed and those two are the real deal long term. I’d doubt either ever gets to the level of fox, but our roster is in such a dire need of a second forward with length and athleticism that it might end up being the sum is bigger than the parts.Trading Fox for a collection of recent lottery picks on rookie contracts + multiple firsts isn't exactly a firesale if we try to build around these guys + Domas and Keegan and Carter and Monk.
In some ways it's more like trading Richmond or J-Will, you're not giving up as much as you are rolling the urgency clock back an hour or two.
I do think giving Fox a massive extension (especially if it’s the super max) would result in him never living up to it. We might be better off if our hands are forced on that decision. I see Fox at a similar level as Jalen Brown. Jalen on his own is not worth that contract; however as a piece of the current Celtics roster it is a no brainer. Difference is we don’t have the Celtics roster around Daaron and likely never will (the hope and a prayer was that Keegan would rise to that level, but I don’t think that’s going to happen).