What Does This Team Need Most?

Let's try out the new tables function by putting Domas up against these 5 guys in some advanced stats over the last four years (since he's been in Sac) vs. these guys' last four years and see where he stands:

PlayerPERWSWS/48BPMVORPTS%TRB%AST%
Sabonis23.136.6.2045.716.6.64921.330.2
Don. Mitchell21.930.1.1635.015.7.5897.425.2
Haliburton22.530.2.1936.115.4.6166.342.9
Banchero (3y)17.111.1.0790.84.9.54211.822.6
A. Davis26.032.0.1995.214.1.60718.815.3
T. Young21.527.0.1312.912.2.5824.945.2

So it turns out you're right! Sabonis is not even on the same tier as any of those players!
The criticism of Sabonis is that he isn't helpful at the highest level of competition. So instead of ignoring that criticism, let's probe playoff stats over the same period
Playoff advanced stats 2022-2025
Markdown (GitHub flavored):
| Player            |   PER |   WS |   TS% |   WS/48 |   BPM |   VORP |   TRB% |   AST% |
|:------------------|------:|-----:|------:|--------:|------:|-------:|-------:|-------:|
| Domantas Sabonis  |  15.9 |  0.3 | 0.517 |   0.064 |   0.7 |    0.2 |   16.2 |   20.8 |
| Anthony Davis     |  24.7 |  3.6 | 0.616 |   0.212 |   6.1 |    1.7 |   19.9 |   12.1 |
| Paolo Banchero    |  19.4 |  0.8 | 0.537 |   0.079 |   5   |    0.8 |   12.6 |   22.6 |
| Tyrese Haliburton |  22   |  2.9 | 0.609 |   0.182 |   6   |    1.5 |    8.7 |   36   |
| Donovan Mitchell  |  21.2 |  2.5 | 0.555 |   0.118 |   5.6 |    2   |    7.3 |   27.8 |
| Trae Young        |  14   | -0.2 | 0.501 |  -0.026 |  -1.6 |    0   |    6.5 |   34.4 |

Screenshot 2025-05-07 at 6.32.48 PM.png


Pretty clear separation there, but let's consider the difference between playoff performance and regular season performance to really highlight the issue.
Playoff - regular season advanced stats 2022-2025
Markdown (GitHub flavored):
| Player            |   PER |    WS |    TS% |   WS/48 |   BPM |   VORP |   TRB% |   AST% |
|:------------------|------:|------:|-------:|--------:|------:|-------:|-------:|-------:|
| Domantas Sabonis  |  -7   | -42   | -0.132 |  -0.135 |  -4.8 |  -19.1 |   -4.8 |   -8.1 |
| Anthony Davis     |  -1.3 | -28.4 |  0.009 |   0.013 |   0.9 |  -12.4 |    1.1 |   -3.2 |
| Paolo Banchero    |   2.3 | -10.3 | -0.005 |   0     |   4.2 |   -4.1 |    0.8 |    0   |
| Tyrese Haliburton |   0.5 | -31.2 | -0.001 |   0.005 |   0.6 |  -15.9 |    2.4 |   -4.7 |
| Donovan Mitchell  |  -0.7 | -27.6 | -0.034 |  -0.045 |   0.6 |  -13.7 |   -0.1 |    2.6 |
| Trae Young        |  -7.5 | -27.2 | -0.081 |  -0.157 |  -4.5 |  -12.2 |    1.6 |  -10.8 |
1746668343392.png

You could make a case that Trae is worse, but clearly there are different levels here. This is the quantified version of the argument. Taking 13 points off his TS% is 🤮
 
View attachment 13508

Huh, weird. B-Ball ref must be broken since Domas is better in every single category

lol Sabonis is 28 Sengun is 22 and already cleared Sabonis in playoff performance and was the all star over him. Shades of fox being better than Mitchell and Brunson
Interesting. When did you ask them? Were they taking into account current contract status or was it more of a generic "who'd you rather have to build a team around?" question?

Didn’t need to ask the all star balloting said it themselves coaches picked Sengun I’ll ask next time the criteria
 
To be fair, Trae Young sure as hell isn’t a star either. He’s a scorer. Same as De’Aaron Fox. Not a star.

So is a star just the top 10 or 15 guys in the league? Because that’s what it sounds like some definition of a star is. No Sabonis isn’t on the level of the elite guys in the league, but he’s in the tier below with guys like Young, Fox, Haliburton, Siakam, etc.
 
I think most people are tired of seeing regular season Domas disappear in the play in and playoff games….the games that matter most in a season.
 
The criticism of Sabonis is that he isn't helpful at the highest level of competition. So instead of ignoring that criticism, let's probe playoff stats over the same period
But over that period Domas has played in 7 total playoff games with a broken wrist and while having been chest-stomped.

I'll take four years of data over a small sample size when he was hurt. I tend to take "doesn't show up in the playoffs" criticisms with a big grain of salt. Small sample size, defenses are playing harder so everybody's numbers go down.
 
But over that period Domas has played in 7 total playoff games with a broken wrist and while having been chest-stomped.

I'll take four years of data over a small sample size when he was hurt. I tend to take "doesn't show up in the playoffs" criticisms with a big grain of salt. Small sample size, defenses are playing harder so everybody's numbers go down.

Sabonis playoff stats in Indiana filtering out three games he didn’t play over 24 minutes

10.8 ppg- 5.7rpg- 2apg

STAR PLAYER!!
 
Are stats from 6-7 years ago even relevant today? Sabonis was a 21-22 year old in Indiana.

We brought up Sabonis recent playoff stats and the poster I responded to said he was hurt as an excuse now we bring his Indian stats and it’s another excuse. Meanwhile anothee poster said he’s a lot better than Sengun who doubles those Indiana stats at the same age while outperforming recent playoff stats as well vs the same team, hilarious!
 
Are stats from 6-7 years ago even relevant today? Sabonis was a 21-22 year old in Indiana.
He wasn’t even a starter at that point in his career either lol
The thing about Domas is that he is a late bloomer who got drafted after being a role/hustle dirty work big for Gonzaga, played that role for OKC in his rookie year as a backup to Steven Adams, got traded to Indiana in the Paul George deal where he was Myles Turner’s backup until he randomly got so good that Indiana had no choice but to start him. But that all happened after his age 21 season
 
But over that period Domas has played in 7 total playoff games with a broken wrist and while having been chest-stomped.

I'll take four years of data over a small sample size when he was hurt. I tend to take "doesn't show up in the playoffs" criticisms with a big grain of salt. Small sample size, defenses are playing harder so everybody's numbers go down.
Being beat up by the time the playoffs come around is a common experience. Domas didn't suffer an official injury, so I don't know what to do with that. Game 1, (pre-stomp) he had a terrible TS% of .320 for what that's worth.

Playoff - regular season advanced stats 2022-2025

Let me remove the WS column (since subtracting reg season win shares from PO win shares isn't meaningful) and adjust the color scale to make each column independant
1746702982736.png

All major players are game-planned against in the playoffs. Most of the players on your list don't fundamentally change under that level of scrutiny. But Domas turned into a pumpkin.

The small sample size argument isn't irrelevant, but it is a bit desperate. I thought reliability and consistency were supposed to be Domas' ineffable superpowers. Claiming that a larger sample size would change the trend, places a lot of hopes in the theory that Domas is inconsistent, and that it'll all average out someday.




But the small sample size argument is persuasive to me in another way. The majority of Domas' impressive regular season efficiency numbers happen in the context of bad teams that didn't even make the playoffs. The fact that Domas plays the role of facilitator on those bad teams makes those efficiency numbers completely damning. I think almost every player in the NBA could average a high TS% if they could pick which shots they wanted to take.

But that's not how it works for most players; when Keegan doesn't shoot the shots he's supposed to take, he gets yelled at and benched. Same for the vast majority of NBA players. Domas gets to choose which shots he takes, and most of the time he chooses to make things easy on himself. Domas having a high TS% in the regular season, is a sign he is an ineffective distributor. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with that, not every great player needs to run the offense. But having the highest efficiency on a team with meh offense is not a good look
 
Last edited:
I love Jrue Holiday but we just finished off a season where we won 40 games and lost a play-in game on our home court because Dallas has size in the post and we do not (and still won't with your proposed rotation). Nothing about this situation points to a 35 year old PG being the final piece of the puzzle for me. I think you've just wasted a year and put us even further into a salary cap hole in the process with a full rebuild looming on the horizon.

Considering the other "one shot to fix this mess" ideas proposed though, I do kinda like the idea in theory of bringing in late career Jrue Holiday as a mentor for the PG of the future. I'm not sure that Carter is that guy yet. He has fantastic glue-guy skills and is already effective as a defensive disruptor though, so I could see him maybe growing into that role if he really focuses on making himself a reliable catch and shoot guy too.

So ultimately, I don't hate this idea. I could be talked into this team-building strategy as a way to kick off the "Doug Christie as head coach era" but you're really losing me with LaVine in the starting lineup and Ellis on the bench. If we're going to be bulldogs, let's just be bulldogs and make the starting backcourt Holiday and Ellis. LaVine gets to be the ultimate green light 6th man instead. He comes in and gets his 25 points every night and then gets out of the way and let's the starting lineup do all the dirty work of holding the lead. If he doesn't like it, he can leave at the end of the season.
I think you’re significantly misunderstanding my POV.

I never said Holiday is the “final piece of the puzzle.” The logic behind trading for Holiday is as follows…

1.) We’d be getting a pick out of the trade since we’d be sending out Monk and saving BOS a lot of money. That’s another young player to develop or asset to use in a bigger trade
2.) Holiday fits the identity Christie & Perry want and can help us establish that identity and culture
3.) Holiday would be a great mentor for Ellis and Carter to learn from defensively and I could see him help Carter as a PG on the offensive end as well
4.) Holiday is an excellent fit next to LaVine both offensively and defensively.

As for adding more size, the first trade I proposed (the Holiday and Simmons ideas were my secondary moves) swaps DeRozan for Marshall which would help address that issue.

LaVine will be our leading scorer with DeRozan off the team. He’ll be starting especially at that contract amount. Holiday, Murray, and Marshall is a lot of defense around him (not to mention guys like Ellis and Carter coming off the bench).

Look, I’m not tied to LaVine at all. However, I see him as a useful asset the following offseason as he will be a massive expiring contract that we can dangle in front of a team (along with other picks/assets) for a big star talent. If we can’t find that type of trade next offseason, I’d be open to extending LaVine but for significantly less (like $20 mil a year - around Monk’s level), but there may be an opportunity to have a lot of cap space that offseason as well and sign a significant piece to go with Sabonis, Murray, Ellis, Carter, and the 1st rounders we have drafted along the way.
 
We brought up Sabonis recent playoff stats and the poster I responded to said he was hurt as an excuse now we bring his Indian stats and it’s another excuse. Meanwhile anothee poster said he’s a lot better than Sengun who doubles those Indiana stats at the same age while outperforming recent playoff stats as well vs the same team, hilarious!

I just don’t think stats from when he was a kid are really relevant today. And to me if you want to talk about the most recent playoffs against GSW, we can look at the numbers but it’s a fact that the Warriors game plan and number 1 priority was to stop Sabonis. Their whole defense was geared towards limiting him, so yeah we see Fox and Monk going off for 30+ points but the whole reason they’re able to do that is because the Warriors defense is keyed in on limiting Sabonis.
 
But over that period Domas has played in 7 total playoff games with a broken wrist and while having been chest-stomped.

I'll take four years of data over a small sample size when he was hurt. I tend to take "doesn't show up in the playoffs" criticisms with a big grain of salt. Small sample size, defenses are playing harder so everybody's numbers go down.

Yeah, this. People severely overreact to tiny playoff sample sizes.
 
We brought up Sabonis recent playoff stats and the poster I responded to said he was hurt as an excuse now we bring his Indian stats and it’s another excuse. Meanwhile anothee poster said he’s a lot better than Sengun who doubles those Indiana stats at the same age while outperforming recent playoff stats as well vs the same team, hilarious!

You told me Sengun is better than Domas. He's clearly not. Maybe eventually, but not right now.

So you move the goal-post to try and compare them both at age 22 because youre clearly wrong in your initial statment. That wasn't the question at hand.
 
Back
Top