tyrant
Starter
R1LOVER said:So is it FIVE or ONE????
it is 1
R1LOVER said:So is it FIVE or ONE????
sloter said:One of the top 5 moves since I've been following Petrie (in no particular order):
1) Drafting Stojakovic
2) Getting Divac
3) Bibby trade
4) Webber trade
5) Getting SAR
Knowing you, sloter, I shouldn't even bother to ask, but which Webber trade would you be referring to: the first one, or the second one?sloter said:One of the top 5 moves since I've been following Petrie (in no particular order):
1) Drafting Stojakovic
2) Getting Divac
3) Bibby trade
4) Webber trade
5) Getting SAR
Wait, what? Petrie signed Jermaine O'Neal? When did this happen?tyrant said:you forgot signing jermaine oneal
tyrant said:it is 1
Mr. S£im Citrus said:Knowing you, sloter, I shouldn't even bother to ask, but which Webber trade would you be referring to: the first one, or the second one?
Gary said:His brain + Maloof money = contenders for many years to come.
Mr. S£im Citrus said:I agree with that; acquiring Abdur-Rahim had nothing to do with genius on Petrie's part, and pretty much everything to do with a combination of cold feet/ineptitude on the part of OMGZEXECOFTHEYEARRODTHORNOMGWTF~!!!!11!! and dumb luck.
Riiiiight...Jkbiker said:Well I bet GP did think of this senario in advance! He got SAR to come for a visit early on. GP rolled out the red carpet, really let him know He was very high on the Kings Hit list, gave him the AAA luxury tour probably with all sorts of free Drink Tokes at the Palms. Heh these guys liked to be wined and dined. GP knew he couldnt offer much more than MLE, GP knew that even though Nets were working out a cool trade deal with blazers that would net a good contract. GP had the foresight to know something could always go south, and he knew if it did We would be on SAR's short list.
Hmmmmm yep Genius!!!!
(as the Biker man drops to his knees, waves arms up and down)
Were not Worthy!
Were not Worthy!!
Mr. S£im Citrus said:Wait, what? Petrie signed Jermaine O'Neal? When did this happen?![]()
captain bill said:what, we should have traded our core guys for crap and just let the team tank? and then sometime in the future decided, hey, we got some picks, lets start winning! im sorry, but that is how teams like the hawks and clippers are made. im very glad that you are not the gm. i dont care what you think of this aquisition, but intentionally draining talent to go for the lottery is just stupid. maybe if we had some big contracts in final years (we don't) and there were some big FAs we wanted to pursue next summer (there aren't) or if the next draft was particularly good (it's not), your idea would make some since. oh wait, no, it's just bad.
Yes, I can. He pulled out the red carpet on the first attempt, giving a good first impression. Shareef was reported as having three serious suiters, that first impression may have played a role the second time around. Other than that, simple luck.Mr. S£im Citrus said:Secondly, it was luck. When the guy was only a physical away from being traded to New Jersey, you can't possibly expect anyone to believe that his becoming available had anything to do whatsoever with any genius on Petrie's part. Petrie didn't trade for Abdur-Rahim; he signed as a free agent. Unless you seriously believe that Petrie tampered with the Portland/New Jersey trade (and, that stupid photoshopped picture aside, that's just silly), you can't give Petrie more than minimal credit for this one.
Kings113 said:When he was Blazers GM. O'Neal was drafted in the awesome 1996 draft.
Petrie had already been Sacramento's GM for a year by then.Kings113 said:When he was Blazers GM. O'Neal was drafted in the awesome 1996 draft.
Reach much?whozit said:Yes, I can. He pulled out the red carpet on the first attempt, giving a good first impression. Shareef was reported as having three serious suiters, that first impression may have played a role the second time around. Other than that, simple luck.
Kev.in said:by the same Geoff Petrie who picked Peja Stojakovic for the Sacramento Kings in that draft as well?
Venom said:Is it one year or not? Because if it is a one-year rental I am OK with it, but if they locked him up for 5 years I will be extremely disappointed.
jeffjcalweb said:19 ptts, 9 rbs and 74 games played a year.... when is the last time Sacto had a PF with that consistency.