Who do you guys think will average more blocks per36....WCS or Bagley?
I'm going to go with Bagley. He doesn't have the elite length of WCS but he's hungrier.
"Why has he been known as a poor defender up until now?" That question has been asked and answered. But I do agree that now Bagley simply needs to prove it to us with effort, intelligence and consistency.He has the tools to be an elite defender, not as a rim protector but a guy with physical tools where he can guard 1-5. The question is how willing is he? And why has he been known as a poor defender up until now? Maybe has never been taught how to play defense properly. Maybe he can become a Shawn Marion type with better scoring. Him becoming a good defender will do wonders for his ceiling.
Koufos will lead us in blocks per 36. But he's not going to lead us in minutes. Or he'd better not. Joerger needs to give most of the minutes/opportunities to Giles and Bagley, and to WCS and Skal - if they earn them. All four of them have the potential to emerge as decent shotblockers this season. But none of them is a Gobert waiting to be discovered. When did anyone criticize Kevin Garnett for being (only) a decent shotblocker? If you've got other tools to make an impact on the defensive end, putting too much emphasis on shotblocking compromises your other assets.Who do you guys think will average more blocks per36....WCS or Bagley?
I'm going to go with Bagley. He doesn't have the elite length of WCS but he's hungrier.
Koufos will lead us in blocks per 36. But he's not going to lead us in minutes. Or he'd better not. Joerger needs to give most of the minutes/opportunities to Giles and Bagley, and to WCS and Skal - if they earn them. All four of them have the potential to emerge as decent shotblockers this season. But none of them is a Gobert waiting to be discovered. When did anyone criticize Kevin Garnett for being (only) a decent shotblocker? If you've got other tools to make an impact on the defensive end, putting too much emphasis on shotblocking compromises your other assets.
"Why has he been known as a poor defender up until now?" That question has been asked and answered. But I do agree that now Bagley simply needs to prove it to us with effort, intelligence and consistency.
Gee, I didn't FEEL like I was making any excuses for Willie. He needs to improve his shotblocking, OK? But without becoming less effective as a defender.Personally I don't like that excuse being used. People use it a lot to explain away WCS's lack of shot blocking. There are plenty of other big men in the league that switch defensively and still get back in time to protect the rim and rack up blocks. WCS isn't the only big man that defends that way he does so there are no excuses there. He's also elite in terms of size and length, yet extremely mediocre when it comes to shot blocking. Somewhere around 65th in league or so in block percentage. There shouldn't be any excuses for any of our other big men either. They are all either long, athletic or both. Being among the league leaders in shot blocking doesn't automatically make you a good defender but when you look at the list it's going to be stacked with some of the best defenders in the league with a few outliers here and there that block shots but don't defend well overall.
Gee, I didn't FEEL like I was making any excuses for Willie. He needs to improve his shotblocking, OK? But without becoming less effective as a defender.
Draymond Green can, and it's not so much guard PG's it's switch onto them with the NBA using so much ball screens now and be able to hold your own. Kings don't have the personnel to run a switching system but it would be nice if Giles and Bagley were to develop into guys that can guard well on the perimeter.I think the concept of defending 1-5 is a fantasy.
NO 6'11' player can guard point guards. Not Willie, nobody. True most of the time at the 2.
You can put a big man on a guard at the end of a game when the shot is likely to be taken from behind the arc. Otherwise they drive past the big man.
Bagley is like a lot of talented players with elite skills. That get through high school and college without playing much defense. Coaches do not focus on it. In the NBA it is different, everyone plays defense except Randolph. The road map for Bagley to make it to elite status means he is going to have to learn to play defense.
While I'm still not happy with the Bagley pick, I think we can expect a high volume, volatile and inefficient season from him, where minutes and likely injuries will cause further fluctuation.
When he gets minutes, Bagley will put up a high volume of shots, but due to his skinny/somewhat-soft frame, poor wingspan and inability to use his right hand means he will likely put up a low FG% on this volume in year one. I'm expecting a Julius Randle curve here... 43% to end the year as:
I think Bagley's strong rebounding will transfer but possibly not as well as we'd expect due to:
- defenders will quickly counter his post moves to make him use his right hand
- coaches will implement schemes to keep him out of the paint (putting stronger/heavier defenders on him) and he will force up tough mid-range shots (typical reason why skinny guys tend to stay out of the paint more once they get to the NBA)
- his short wingspan makes his shot easier to block against longer and more athletic defenders
- his low FT% is indicative that his 39% 3P percentage was a fluke and will likely regress to the 25-32% range in year 1
I'd also question his ability to play an 82 game season. His is skinny and not particularly cut/muscular... A. Voisin would have had a field day here... usually skinny guys are more prone to injury in the NBA and Bags has already had an issue in the SL. A bold prediction but one I'm calling nonetheless.
- lack of strength and weight vs. NBA bigs = box him out easier vs college
- short wingspan means less ability to grab/tip ball on rebounds vs longer defenders (even with his hops/second jump)
Needless to say, it'll be a frustrating season w/ Bags and he won't get enough minutes, but the promise of his development and a new "youth-oriented, faster pace coach" will help the team sell tickets next summer, so there's hope and a business reason to help him succeed. Roughly predicting 26mpg, 13pts, 7.5 reb, 43% FG, 29% 3P, 1.2 APG, 2.3 TO, .7 steals, .8 blocks... good for a 12-14 PER.
Draymond Green can, and it's not so much guard PG's it's switch onto them with the NBA using so much ball screens now and be able to hold your own. Kings don't have the personnel to run a switching system but it would be nice if Giles and Bagley were to develop into guys that can guard well on the perimeter.
While I'm still not happy with the Bagley pick, I think we can expect a high volume, volatile and inefficient season from him, where minutes and likely injuries will cause further fluctuation.
When he gets minutes, Bagley will put up a high volume of shots, but due to his skinny/somewhat-soft frame, poor wingspan and inability to use his right hand means he will likely put up a low FG% on this volume in year one. I'm expecting a Julius Randle curve here... 43% to end the year as:
I think Bagley's strong rebounding will transfer but possibly not as well as we'd expect due to:
- defenders will quickly counter his post moves to make him use his right hand
- coaches will implement schemes to keep him out of the paint (putting stronger/heavier defenders on him) and he will force up tough mid-range shots (typical reason why skinny guys tend to stay out of the paint more once they get to the NBA)
- his short wingspan makes his shot easier to block against longer and more athletic defenders
- his low FT% is indicative that his 39% 3P percentage was a fluke and will likely regress to the 25-32% range in year 1
I'd also question his ability to play an 82 game season. His is skinny and not particularly cut/muscular... A. Voisin would have had a field day here... usually skinny guys are more prone to injury in the NBA and Bags has already had an issue in the SL. A bold prediction but one I'm calling nonetheless.
- lack of strength and weight vs. NBA bigs = box him out easier vs college
- short wingspan means less ability to grab/tip ball on rebounds vs longer defenders (even with his hops/second jump)
Needless to say, it'll be a frustrating season w/ Bags and he won't get enough minutes, but the promise of his development and a new "youth-oriented, faster pace coach" will help the team sell tickets next summer, so there's hope and a business reason to help him succeed. Roughly predicting 26mpg, 13pts, 7.5 reb, 43% FG, 29% 3P, 1.2 APG, 2.3 TO, .7 steals, .8 blocks... good for a 12-14 PER.
Wow. So he should have been a 2nd round pick if even that with all those negatives.
That sounds sarcastic, but you're really describing a guy who does not belong in this league. Is that realistic?
I think some of what you wrote is correct on some level. Lets hope you are wrong about the injuries. Marvin should be in the weight room and shooting a lot of jumpers. I expect a lot of double doubles and better than anticipated defense because of his physical skills.
Exhibit A:
Exhibit B:
Draymond Green can. Okay one guy in the world. Sorry I forgot.Draymond Green can, and it's not so much guard PG's it's switch onto them with the NBA using so much ball screens now and be able to hold your own. Kings don't have the personnel to run a switching system but it would be nice if Giles and Bagley were to develop into guys that can guard well on the perimeter.
Draymond Green can. Okay one guy in the world. Sorry I forgot.