Voisin: Perfectly played, perfectly decisive

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
http://www.sacbee.com/content/sports/story/14302815p-15175096c.html

Ailene Voisin: Perfectly played, perfectly decisive
By Ailene Voisin -- Bee Columnist
Published 12:01 am PDT Sunday, August 20, 2006


So this is how it looks, how it feels, how it happens.

The perfect pass, the perfect play, the perfect ending.

The perfect game.

On an altogether perfect afternoon at Arco Arena, there was no chance for the Houston Comets, no stopping the Monarchs. There was nothing to do but applaud the performers and acknowledge the obvious. In what is evolving into a remarkable, improbable postseason run, the defending WNBA champions returned home and handed the visitors a message in a bottle -- a 12-step solution that should be available at every sporting goods store in America.

Individual star power apparently has its limits. John Whisenant's band of collective soulmates -- the team that clasps his defensive philosophy to heart in a smothering, smoldering embrace -- blitzed Sheryl Swoopes and Tina Thompson into the offseason, sent the legendary Dawn Staley into retirement, and left longtime WNBA observers shaking their heads in awe and admiration, and yes, in envy.

"Let's get serious," Comets coach Van Chancellor said after his club had been eliminated Saturday. "I hear the Maloof boys got John Whisenant a nice car (for the 2005 title). If they keep playing like this, they might as well go find a second one for his wife. I don't mean to put the pressure on, but if they play the way they did against us, they're pretty good. They beat us bad, twice."

Once, and you think, "aberration."

Twice, and you remember, "champions."

Three times, and, no, you won't get fooled again.

"This is the most fun I've ever had playing sports," said Kara Lawson, a product of Pat Summitt's storied Tennessee program, "because everyone talks about playing on a team that is really unselfish, that truly cares about being successful and doesn't care about individual things. And you can't fake that. You can tell by the way we play. We don't panic. We move the ball. We help each other out."

Or as Chancellor said, let's get serious here. Let's recall the Monarchs' stealthy 2005 championship run. Who ever would have depicted them as flashy or flamboyant? As high-profile? They never fuss because no one on the roster ranks among the league-leaders in scoring and rebounding. They could care less about the lack of Letterman appearances. They never gripe about about their bite-size salaries or the need to work overseas to pay the rent. Heck, they never even complained when former Kings coach Rick Adelman routinely conspired to keep them out of his precious practice facility. (Something about scheduling the Kings for six hours of warmups, shooting instruction, showers, foot massages, or any number of other excuses that were used to justify barring the doors to the women).

They just play. They just play the game.

They play perfectly, at least Saturday.

"I have never seen anything like this," admired former Monarch Ruthie Bolton. "I am standing here, and I still can't believe what we just saw."

Precise passes on backdoor cuts. Rebounds that resulted in layups. Loose balls that afforded second shots. Offensive execution that led to open jumpers. Defensive pressure that induced turnovers. Defensive cohesiveness that enabled one player to cover for another, almost never presented Swoopes, Thompson or Staley with uncontested opportunities. And, of course, characteristic of a Monarchs team that is arguably the deepest in the league, there were individual standouts during certain sequences, but it was the full body of work that was most impressive.

From one to 12 -- and we'll give rookie Kim Smith a pass here because while she failed to score, she didn't commit any turnovers either -- all of the Monarchs offered something. You want the blindsided steal? That would be Ticha Penicheiro, who once again pushed the pace and kept the pressure on the Comets. Timely jumpers? Lawson and Nicole Powell. Snake-like moves and rebounds? Yolanda Griffith. Surprising, opportunistic scoring? Rebekkah Brunson, Hamchétou Maïga-Ba, Kristin Haynie, Erin Buescher. You want more? You want leadership?

There was Whisenant, stalking the sideline, demanding a response, mostly demanding that his players make the simple plays, that they perform with a sense of collective purpose.

"We were good," he allowed afterward, with a slight smile. "We have to continue playing like that because it won't get any easier."

The great expectations have returned.

Now try improving on perfection.

About the writer: Reach Ailene Voisin at (916) 321-1208 or avoisin@sacbee.com.
 
Heck, they never even complained when former Kings coach Rick Adelman routinely conspired to keep them out of his precious practice facility. (Something about scheduling the Kings for six hours of warmups, shooting instruction, showers, foot massages, or any number of other excuses that were used to justify barring the doors to the women).

Some kids never grow up.... :rolleyes:
 
All in all, I think it was a great article. She's talking about the Monarchs overcoming obstacles, which they did. I'm not gonna begrudge her one little jab at Adelman...

;)
 
Well I will... she can't even praise the Monarchs without taking a shot at Adelman? What kind of bull**** is that? :mad:

See You Next Tuesday, Voisin...
 
One of the obstacles the Monarchs faced was a lack of opportunity to use the practice facility. Yes, this was solely because of Adelman and his scheduling. This is old news. It was worked out between all parties a long time ago. Was it a valid obstacle to be mentioned? IMHO - yes. Did she use it to take an unnecessary and tiresome dig at Rick Adelman? Undoubtedly!! For example: the use of the term "routinely conspired" was totally unnecessary and vindictive.
 
Last edited:
I am still not going to get that upset about it. Why allow one predictable dig at Adelman to ruin your enjoyment of an otherwise pretty danged good article about the Monarchs?

We know Voisin will take shots at Adelman and Webber until her fingers fall off. It's like getting upset that cats will hunt and kill birds. Some things are just part of the world we live in.

I am more impressed with the rest of the article.

On an altogether perfect afternoon at Arco Arena, there was no chance for the Houston Comets, no stopping the Monarchs. There was nothing to do but applaud the performers and acknowledge the obvious. In what is evolving into a remarkable, improbable postseason run, the defending WNBA champions returned home and handed the visitors a message in a bottle -- a 12-step solution that should be available at every sporting goods store in America.

That's good to read. And I think it's the type of thing that just might bring more basketball fans out to Arco to see just what's so good about the Monarchs.
 
So, hey you guys can't even read with pleasure a great article about the Monarchs without taking a shot at the writer? After all the complaining about her articles? This was a great article. And true. The Monarchs have pulled it together are were-are-beautiful to watch in action. Wow, what a game. Professionals on both sides, but we did it better, followed the plan, played all 40 minutes, a team to be proud of.
 
Part of VF21's post about Voisin's article:
...And I think it's the type of thing that just might bring more basketball fans out to Arco to see just what's so good about the Monarchs.


Wait until Marcos Breton writes a column bashing the Monarchs and the WNBA, just like he did last year during the week of the Finals.

:mad:
 
I have a feeling you may get something positive from him, or nothing at all?
If we are to take his word that he watched a game a while back.

I'm with Carole we should appreciate the positive articles. The writers have done well this season covering the team overall.
Now the arena issue that's another story...I'm nervous about the outcome in Nov. If we voters donot pass this, next season could be our last Monarchs/Kings season. Everyone get out & vote...Save our teams!
 
The Bee had 3 writers sitting on press row (Voisin, Guitierrez and Arrington) on Saturday, and they traveled their beat writer to Houston for game 1. During the finals last year, even Marty McNeal lodged a WNBA story. Some cities would KILL for this coverage of their team. I'll get on my soap box again and ask that we applaud the Bee for this and for the positive treatment because it does not happen uniformly elsewhere around this league. As much as I dislike Breton's opportunism and hypocrisy - he at least thinks its "important" enough to write about.
 
The Bee had 3 writers sitting on press row (Voisin, Guitierrez and Arrington) on Saturday, and they traveled their beat writer to Houston for game 1. During the finals last year, even Marty McNeal lodged a WNBA story. Some cities would KILL for this coverage of their team. I'll get on my soap box again and ask that we applaud the Bee for this and for the positive treatment because it does not happen uniformly elsewhere around this league. As much as I dislike Breton's opportunism and hypocrisy - he at least thinks its "important" enough to write about.

I agree completely, MBF.

As much as I lambast the Bee at times, the coverage they're giving the Monarchs is worth applauding. If they got anywhere near as much positive feedback for doing something right as they get negative feedback for doing something wrong, maybe they'd do more of the right stuff.

So, to Voisin and the Bee I give:

604.gif
 
So, hey you guys can't even read with pleasure a great article about the Monarchs without taking a shot at the writer?
No.

Because I happen to like both the Kings and the Monarchs, and I was a pro-Adelman guy during his entire tenure, and Voisin is notorious for being vehemently anti-Adelman, so I guess I lack the objectivity to disregard her past comments about the former when she's supposed to be praising the latter... especially when she uses a column that's ostensibly intended to praise the latter as a soapbox to take shots at the former.

She could have written that column without making that comment. And, if she had, I wouldn't have beef... But she did.

And I do.
 
Last edited:
It was a legitimate beef. That's the difference.
Not to me. I don't hand out benefit of the doubt to perennial jerks just because they may have finally stumbled upon a point after eight years of poking people with sticks.
 
That's fine and is certainly your prerogative. I, on the other hand, am again looking at the bigger picture...

Voisin wrote a excellent article that gave well-deserved kudos to the Monarchs AND I think it actually might intrigue some people who have never watched a WNBA game before enough to attend one of the playoff games. That would be great for all concerned.

It was one phrase in an article and it was a phrase that most people would have gone right past.

IMHO it's nit-picking to ignore the whole picture because one little piece is not to your liking.
 
Well, never let it be said about me that I'm not a nit-picker...

Well, that won't be said about me either, but I have to agree that, aside from the always-predictable, sometimes out of the blue digs at past Kings entities that haven't gotten along with AV, her Monarchs piece this go 'round was well done.
 
Back
Top