Voisin: Musselman must step up and coach

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#1
http://www.sacbee.com/100/story/93185.html

Ailene Voisin: Musselman must step up and coach
By Ailene Voisin - Bee Columnist
Last Updated 12:19 am PST Friday, December 15, 2006


Ron Artest is asking for it. Mike Bibby is asking for it. Most of their Kings teammates are voicing similar, if more subtle pleas.

They want help.

They want an identity.

They want someone to take control.

They want their coach to coach.

Six weeks into the season, Eric Musselman occupies the hot seat in his own locker room. Players question his schemes and wonder aloud about their roles. The offense is about as free-flowing as a sport-utility vehicle with the brakes pumping, the defense surprisingly passive despite the presence of Artest and the vastly improved Kevin Martin.

Perhaps most troubling is a team dynamic nearing the toxicity level of the final weeks of the Vlade Divac-Chris Webber era. Artest and Bibby, specifically, are separated by more than a few feet in the clubhouse. And everyone else is standing around -- yes, there is too much of that -- and waiting to see who wins the power struggle.

In the meantime, the Kings are losing games at a brisk rate. The team that charged into the 2005-06 postseason is stuck in the mud that is known as the Pacific Division cellar. True, significant personnel issues remain, with the lack of a legitimate shot-blocker and frontcourt length/athleticism the most obvious deficiencies.

While no one projected these Kings as contenders, it is reasonable to expect performances that reflect their young coach -- his intensity, his energy, his feistiness, his innate competitiveness. Indeed, the people who frequent Arco Arena are seeking escape, not root canals. And if the fans watching on television wanted daily off-court drama, wanted to hear details about a dysfunctional family, they would watch "Dr. Phil."

Musselman directs this show.

This is up to him.

"For the team to play better, there has to be a higher level of team play," Geoff Petrie said Thursday. "That's it. Bottom line. No matter how you go about doing that.

"Eric (Musselman) is still finding out about his team. You have to have some kind of vision to accomplish what you're trying to do, but once on the battlefield, it's always a little bit different. At some point, the vision and reality have to start to merge. If not, you look at adjustments."

In other words, Musselman has changes to make. He has major decisions to make. He must clarify roles, establish a more effective offensive style (ditch the playbook and let them play faster), solve the mystery of Bibby's disappearing jump shot and stop placating egos by dispensing playing time on a democratic basis. He appears almost intent on killing his reputation from Golden State. Many of the players didn't care for him, but both seasons, the Warriors undeniably overachieved.

Musselman isn't here to make friends. He isn't here to indulge aging, ailing former stars (see Rick Adelman and Chris Webber). He's here to win games. And to do that? To turn this around and have a reasonable chance at a playoff berth?

Artest must be designated as the man. No doubt about it. This is a star-driven league, a pecking order the natural order of things.

Mere months ago, Artest was the leader, disruptive only with his defense, while Bibby was the leading scorer and complementary sidekick. Why change the script now? Or given Martin's emergence, perhaps Bibby should mix a few more assists and dribble-drives into his jump-shooting repertoire.

"It is what it is," Petrie noted. "Ron was the catalyst last year for significant change."

No, for the Kings to have a prayer at making the extra pass, at reclaiming the zip and unselfishness they displayed during the exhibition season, at accelerating the pace offensively and defensively, Musselman must get the two elephants into the same room and on the same page. He must talk to them. Scold them. Encourage them. Cajole them. Tutor them. Coach them. They'll respect him more in the morning.

The alternative is to allow the situation to fester and await the inevitable implosion. Conflict resolution doesn't necessarily mean avoiding confrontation. Forcing the issue might even result in a healthy exchange -- and provide some answers.

Is Bibby fretting about his contract status? Has he forgotten his value as a facilitator? Does he really want the pressure of measuring his value and mitigating his poor on-ball defense solely by the accuracy of his jump shot? The longest-tenured King has been a durable, enduring asset, one of the league's big-game players. Surely he will emerge from this funk, whatever the causes?

As for Artest? Tough player to coach, yet tougher even to score against.

Musselman has a difficult job.

But he knew that when he signed on.

About the writer: Reach Ailene Voisin at (916) 321-1208 or avoisin@sacbee.com
 
#2
Great Article. It seems like the writer has literally taken words out of my mouth and printed them in this article. I do not think that it is the same Mussleman that Kings hired.
During games I do not see him as the same passionate intense coach, directing his players in Avery Johnson way. It seems that in his second tenure as a coach, this time it is more about improving his image in the eyes of his players by boot licking. Instead, he should be showing a burning desire to win games to his players. He should inspire his team, push them, challenge them to play better. Instead, I see him doing nothing during games. Remember the first preseason game against Dallas when Mussleman was literally screaming on top of his lungs that we could hear his voice louder than the commentators, directing players what to do. Where is that Mussleman?
 
#4
My thoughts too. I think he could be guilty conscious...he doesn't want to scold his players, coax them, challenge (or whatever strategy a hard headed and usually an elite coach does such as Greg Poppovich, Avery, even Don Nelson) who stood behind him during his low times. ( and behind him during the press conference)

A lot of times after Kings lose games solely due to their dumb errors, poor execution and horrible defense. I hear Muss in post game praising the other team's top scorer and blaming him for his team's demise. All he could achieve is give his players safe haven from critics, when he should be the biggest critic of his team. Its just sad...I am frustated with the state of this team and this coach.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#5
He may have overcompensated, but let's not kid ourselves about the alternative -- he got his *** fired last time for being an ******* basically, and his players said "bleep you" and tuned him out. There is just so much about Muss that screams "learning on the job". He too might benefit from us tearing it all down and going into true "build with youth" rebuilding. That's a strategy that gets a lot of coaches fired, and might get Muss fired too. But on the other hand if we bring in a bunch of kids, Muss won't have the credibility gap he's facing with our current vets looking down their noses at him and pondering whether he's got what it takes or not. I've seen a number of occasions where our guys have just flat out ignored Muss and just gone back to what they know out of lack of confidence in his schemes. At this rate he's going to have a hard time surviving long enough to get the experience he seems to so desperately need.
 
Last edited:
#6
I think the lesson Musselman learned after the Golden State gig was that he got fired because the players didn't like him, which is precisely the wrong lesson to learn from that situation since he was gone no matter what because Mullin wanted his guy. Results are much more important than being liked, and he got good results. But for some reason he thought the way he could lead in Sacramento was by being buddy-buddy with the players, rather than coming in and trying to build respect and taking no ****, and of course then the DUI happened. Now we have a coach who no one respects.

The fact is that coaches who were not former NBA players have a steep, steep road to building any sort of credibility whatsoever or rapport with players. Aside from the tight fraternity that it's difficult to break into, I think unless you were an NBA player you just don't know what it was like to play for money and the accompanying pressures of the spotlight. It's one of the reasons, in my opinion, college coaches have such a horrible track record. They just don't understand the mind of an NBA player. It can happen, (the Van Gundys for instance) but the types of guys who make it are hard-***es and they grate on players and they don't take any ****.

The Kings need the Muss of Golden State, not the Dr. Phil Muss who wants to be everyone's buddy. Unfortunately I think the tone has already been set, and once players have given up on trusting their coach that's pretty much it. Adios muchachos. That's not something you get back.

In the opening weeks of his administration Musselman dug his own grave, and, unfortunately, he dug it so deep and wide that the whole team is lying in there with him.
 
Last edited:
#8
I think unless you were an NBA player you just don't know what it was like to play for money and the accompanying pressures of the spotlight. It's one of the reasons, in my opinion, college coaches have such a horrible track record. They just don't understand the mind of an NBA player. It can happen, (the Van Gundys for instance) but the types of guys who make it are hard-***es and they grate on players and they don't take any ****.
I think this is one of the best insights on the Muss situation I've heard in a long while. It's like, No matter how perfect the piece is, it still just doesn't fit in the puzzle. nbrans, you're definately on to something...
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#9
Not at all sure it was the wrong lesson learned -- if he had come in here all little general on us, think we might very well be having this same thread only about how guys were noticeably bristling and tuning him out already. That hardass stuff always sells much better to the cheap seats than it actually does to the players, at least in any long term sense. There needs to be the "friend" aspect running underneath it as well. Many college coaches inj fact fail preciisely because they are used to relating to their players like kids rather than like men. Think its more a question of Muss learning the don't be an *** lesson almost too well, and flopping back over the other way in fairly extreme and amateurish fashion. That's what I mean by him learning on the job. He tried taking all left hand turns the first time, and got burned. So now he tries taking all right hand turns instead, when the real answer of course lies somewhere in the middle. As I said, learning on the job. At our expense unfortunately.

I definitely agree about the NBA player credibility gap though, and that's a toughie. It was why Whiz was such a terrible choice to be the new guy -- fair or not he would have been facing this giant "oh its the girls' coach" credibility gap, and not that he was coaching in the WNBA, but that that was basically ALL that he had coached. I don't think its 100% about coaches not "getting" NBA players -- although some of it is. I think just as much of it is the players, who we often forget are basically the absolute elite in the entire world at what they do, looking down upon the outsiders as unworthy. Who is this guy to be telling me what to do?

Van Gundy had the advantage when he was hired of being the right hand man for the former regime (Riley), and so being a guy that all of that set of players already knew and trusted. He was associated with their success. And so by the time that wore off, he had been given the necessary credibility as a real true NBA coach by years of work and relative success, and he was free of any stigma. I had hoped that Muss, as a former coach himself, might have that credibility, or at least significantly more than Whiz. But its working out that he's feeling very much like a rookie outsider coach in his first go around, full of nifty plans and diagrams, but not having a feel for how it all works in the real world. A lot of his stuff feels very gimmicky and almost too clever -- the sorts of cute little gimmicks and stuff that the experienced NBA coaches kind of roll their eyes at, adjust to, and say "is that all you've got kid?".

I've argued before that the NBA coaching position is much more about leadership than it is about basketball knowledge. Assuming some basic grasp of the game you could probably win games scratching basic plays out in the dirt during every timeout if you had your players all buying in and believing in you as the leader. This was the attraction of the Mario Elie possibility this summer -- nto that he was necessarily going to be a great Xs and Os guy, but that he had no credibility gap -- was not only a former NBA player, but a champion, and a leader during his days as a player. And maybe he would have had a better feel for when to squeeze his guys and when to massage them (er...that line sounds really bad... :eek: ).
 
Last edited:
#11
"For the team to play better, there has to be a higher level of team play," Geoff Petrie said Thursday.

Oh boy. The man's a genius. Why don't we just sit the team down in a room and have them watch Coach Carter also? That'll motivate them. This team has just lost its confidence. They get that back, they'll be fine. We still need some interior presence, but we'll see a huge improvement.
 
Last edited: