Voisin: Feelings are clear; love has faded

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
Note: Don't let the crappy title fool you. This is a pretty good column about Mike Bibby, his future and that of the Kings...

http://www.sacbee.com/351/story/127938.html

Ailene Voisin: Feelings are clear: The love has faded
By Ailene Voisin - Bee Columnist
Last Updated 12:41 am PST Friday, February 23, 2007


A breakup between the Kings and their one-time clutch shooter would have been in the best interest of all concerned. Mike Bibby and Geoff Petrie and the Maloofs can all agree on that.

Yet the inevitable divorce -- stay tuned this summer -- won't occur because Bibby stopped taking out the garbage or began leaving the cap off the toothpaste. Nothing that sordid or sloppy. Rather, the strain between the longest-tenured King and his bosses traces to the same simple elements that doom so many other relationships.

Bibby has stayed the same, and the Kings want change.

They want to get younger, play faster, become more athletic. They want new and different and exciting.

And Bibby? Though one of the league's premier shooters, he is no longer young and has never been fast or athletic or more than mildly interested in defense.

So for the closing weeks, Bibby and the Kings will live like an estranged couple sharing a house until the kids turn 18. The atmosphere figures to be uncomfortable at best. At worst, everyone in the locker room will be miserable.

"The deadline creates a lot of anxiety for everybody," Petrie said after refusing to consummate a trade that would have sent Bibby to Cleveland for forward Drew Gooden, "but you have to let it go. ... We need him to play. We still have to try and win games."

Though the deal failed to materialize for obvious reasons, specifically because the Cavaliers lacked the additional quality draft picks or expiring contracts Petrie coveted, the candor of the conversation at least injected some clarity into a murky situation. The sides are picked. The end to that eight-season playoff run is near. The current standings are nothing more than foil, just crazy numbers that distort reality. The Kings remain in the Western Conference playoff hunt only because the teams they're chasing are so pathetic.

All eyes over at the kingdom should be fixated on an offseason that will present opportunities to reconfigure an ailing roster in one or all of three ways: via the draft, free agency or trade. Salary cap flexibility is all the buzz, with Petrie's aggressive attempt to trade Bibby particularly significant in this sense: Teams that deal their veteran starting point guards -- or seem determined to do so -- are intent on changing both the personality and style of play.

In essence, without saying as much as sayonara, Petrie announced his blueprint for the Kings' next generation. And although it excludes Bibby for several reasons, including the $28 million he is owed over the next two seasons, the formula (new and exciting and athletic) isn't designed to disparage the nine-year veteran as a person or a player.

This is Mike Bibby here. Who doesn't remember who hit all those big shots? Who wanted the ball against the Lakers? Who once engaged Steve Nash in delightful duels? Rather, this pragmatic Kings approach simply reinforces the notion that Bibby's particular talents don't fit into their future.

At 6-foot-1 and 190 pounds, Bibby is a hybrid, a shooting guard at heart who, because of his small size and lack of quickness, is cast as a point guard by profession. And frankly, he owes the Kings an assist here. The team that Petrie began piecing together almost a decade ago -- adroitly matching the skills and personalities of Vlade Divac, Chris Webber, Peja Stojakovic, Jon Barry, Bobby Jackson, Doug Christie and Brad Miller, among others -- offered a near-perfect stage for an undersized, combination-type point guard such as Bibby to excel.

Christie's presence and complementary talents were particularly beneficial. At 6-6, he was the Kings' primary ballhandler, the best defender, the most creative passer among the guards and certainly the most effective at initiating the fast break. He was an anomaly, a modern-era guard who advanced the offense with a long pass, eschewing any temptation to dominate the ball and slow the pace.

Knowing Petrie as we do, these new and future Kings are being assembled in the image of the 1999-2004 squads, built to pass, to rebound and run, with Kevin Martin, Francisco García, Ronnie Price, Quincy Douby and John Salmons already eminently capable of sprinting and passing and dunking. But along with the glaring need for a rebounder and interior defender, the Kings need someone to accelerate the tempo, force the pace, direct the break, defend the ball.

That someone is not Bibby. It just isn't.

About the writer: Reach Ailene Voisin at (916) 321-1208 or avoisin@sacbee.com.
 
You're right VF, its a good article. Doesn't blame anyone.

Bibby's having a down year, at least partly because of injuries to the thumb and wrist of his shooting hand which were painful and ligered way longer than expected. But he didn't suddenly become a bad player, with no hope. I think on the right team, he could still be an important and valuable piece. It just isn't with the Kings anymore.

As the song says, breaking up is hard to do. Kings fans have had to do a lot of breaking up the last few years. Nothing bad about that past (well, except for never quite getting there) and I wouldn't trade the memories for anything.

But the future can't arrive until we let go of the past. And nobody has to be to be to blame for the fact that its gone.
 
Yeah, that's about how I've felt about the Bibby situation. Still a talented player (shooters with that kind of track record don't just go cold and fail to recover) but no longer fits with this team. Without Webber, Vlade, and Doug out there to dazzle with their passing, we really would be better served with a pass-first point guard. And preferably one who can defend. (Have you watched Utah lately? Deron Williams is a perfect exaple of what a distributing point guard can do for a team.) And we really need to divert a hefty chunk of that payroll towards a new frontcourt. This is probably redundant and pointless at this point, but I still can't believe Petrie didn't figure this out a little sooner -- like before he let 3 talented pass-first point guards slip past in the draft, all of which are excelling right away on other teams. (Marcus Williams, Rajon Rondo, Sergio Rodriguez) And you could probably add Kyle Lowry to that list too. Any one of those guys would have put us in a much better place right now to rebuild for the future. I guess the playoff series had everyone on the Kings convinced that this team would still be a contender with just a few adjustments. And I'm sure bringing Bonzi back was an essential part of that plan. Maybe a tad optimistic at the time considering Bonzi was offering no guarantees and they didn't even know yet who their coach was going to be.
 
Last edited:
"They want to get younger, play faster, become more athletic. They want new and different and exciting..."

Aileen, that's exactly what i want. That's how i first got into the Kings. JWill was the catalyst for a whole new King experience soon replaced w/ Bibby who carried on with the great assistance of Doug Christie. So yeah, let's work our way in that direction.

The irony is that we keep trading these guys off. Bobby Jackson (no further comment). Gerald Wallace (will never forget the snuff he put on Shaq in the playoffs or the crowd chanting his name again and again and again the night he put on a show like no other at Arco). Still think about Mo Evans and some of the amazing work he'd do around the rim cleaning up missed shots. Even Matt Barnes was something that seemed to hold promise and play in the mold of DC. Athletic, exciting. Brings people to the arena. Elevates play. Inspires everybody.

Have i missed anybody?

Mike Bibby used to be an essential part of the equation but you're right Aileen. The formula and the (gasp) 'chemistry' has completely changed.

Ronnie Price is somebody like that. Maybe not in the upper echelon but who really knows. Seemed like Muss was ready to cut him loose this year. Give him a chance to shine. Show some confidence in him. Then nothing. Then a brief outing the other day.

Quincy Douby? Still doubt that one. Kevin Martin. Never got on that bandwagon and wonder if he could ever be that consistent force.

Maybe we'll get back to be the darlings of the NBA nation, someday. God, those were glorious days.
 
Yeah, all 3 of those draft picks would be what we need for the future. I especially like JWill2 out of the bunch, followed by Rondo, that guy is an amazing defender. I just don't understand GPs desire to try to make a small SG a PG. Didn't we learn with Bibby? It's great if a PG can shoot, but a pass 1st and quick/dynamic one who can lead the fast break and get back and defend is one who we should be after.
 
Bibby has stayed the same, and the Kings want change.....They want to get younger, play faster, become more athletic. They want new and different and exciting.

What I think is fascinating is how in about 4 months time the perception of management has revolved 180 degrees. Remember at the beginning of the season when Reynolds was talking about Bibby taking over the mantle of Nash as the best point guard in the league? Granted, Reynolds is known for hyperbole concerning the Kings, but even so, he sincerely thought Bibby was entering into his prime and that he was ready to take over the mantle from Nash. At the least, Reynolds must have been thinking that Bibby was a top 5 point guard in this league. And Reynolds and Petrie certainly talk to one another all the time. I don't think it's a big leap at all to say that Reynold's thinking reflected Petrie's thoughts on Bibby. So when exactly did their thinking change? What was the game that finally did it for them?

And Bibby? Though one of the league's premier shooters, he is no longer young and has never been fast or athletic or more than mildly interested in defense.

This is something that Petrie and Reynolds knew all along. And rather than look at the glass half empty, they looked at it half full -- according to Reynolds, Bibby is just entering his prime.

....Teams that deal their veteran starting point guards -- or seem determined to do so -- are intent on changing both the personality and style of play.

Couldn't agree more. When did Kings' management figure out that the game has passed them by? What is fascinating to me is that it took a season of getting butts kicked for them to get it. Not exactly a pro-active mentality.

Christie's presence and complementary talents were particularly beneficial. At 6-6, he was the Kings' primary ballhandler, the best defender, the most creative passer among the guards and certainly the most effective at initiating the fast break. He was an anomaly, a modern-era guard who advanced the offense with a long pass, eschewing any temptation to dominate the ball and slow the pace.

Voison is right on the button, but there a few more buttons as well. The combination of the 3 point line and the no-hands defense enforced on guard play by the officials has given quick guards even more of an edge. The game past Petrie by and he didn't realize it until "the day of reckoning". The events over the last few months and over the last couple of years continue to reinforce in my mind the notion that Petrie is reactive rather than proactive, and that it's taken him two years to figure out that basketball is a much different game than what he thought it was, and as such the players that he needs to win are also different.
 
I just don't understand GPs desire to try to make a small SG a PG.

Look at the Trailblazers of the early '70s. They never had anybody who could manage 6 assists per game, instead they always had 2-3 guys who could do 4-5 assists per game. In 1975, for example, those guys were PF/C Bill Walton, and Geoff Petrie, but more often they were guards, as in the Petrie-Adelman years.

Petrie was, himself, kind of small to be a SG (6'4"), but he typically took about 20 shots a game, so you really couldn't call him a pass-first sort of guard, even when he was filling it at (nominal) PG. And sometimes he played SF as well, despite his size.

In other words, he was a combo guard shooter and flexible piece.

Make more sense now?
 
I'm done looking back. It's all been said 100 times, IMHO.

I'm going to look forward and hope for the best.

"They want to get younger, play faster, become more athletic. They want new and different and exciting..."

And I want that, too. Despite all the finger pointing, etc. things had to decline. It was inevitable. I firmly believe Petrie hoped for the best while trying to get into position to rebuild.

Now it's nearly the time. After last night's debacle, anyone who has dreams of the playoffs is delusional. I can still root for the team for the simple reason I'm supporting the guys on the court, even though I know they're not going to make a late-season surge and surprise us. They're trying to fix a Ferrari with kitchen implements and it's not gonna work...and no matter how badly we feel, the players have to be much more frustrated.

Geoff Petrie built the team that took my breath away. I think he's fully capable of building another team to do the same...
 
Back
Top