Voisin: Coach taking share of lumps

nbrans

All-Star
Ailene Voisin: Coach taking share of lumps

By Ailene Voisin - Bee Columnist

Last Updated 12:11 am PST Saturday, January 20, 2007
Story appeared in SPORTS section, Page C1

Eric Musselman returned to the head-coaching ranks in a very difficult arena. Let's acknowledge that from the outset. He inherited a team in transition, signed on with a locker room of grumpy guys who, when even on their best collective behavior, merely rate as potential contenders for a ninth consecutive Western Conference playoff berth.

So you can't fire the guy, yet.

That would be cruel, unusual and premature punishment, especially for someone who is asked to win while preserving the shaky marriage of Mike Bibby and Ron Artest. The inevitable breakup of the two veterans figures to be messy, with the custody battle involving everything from the basketball to the dining room table.

No, Musselman deserves a reasonable grace period here. Informal polls and heated fan reaction notwithstanding, there are mitigating circumstances for the Kings' inglorious slump, and talent-wise, more gaps on the roster than potholes in the parking lot at Arco Arena.

The undersized power forwards fail to rebound. The center is shrinking by the season. The small forward and point guard share the ball only when absolutely necessary. The emerging young star is perplexed and often ignored in the offense (see feuding veterans). The lack of frontcourt length and athleticism is frightening, and almost as intimidating as the toxic mix of personalities.

Yet the Kings are certainly talented enough to convert free throws, execute something resembling an offense, reach for rebounds, raise a hand and contest shots on defense. They should be prevailing on their once formidable home court instead of performing sluggishly and succumbing to silly mistakes in overtime. They should at least pretend to earn their hefty salaries.

And as the man in charge, Musselman takes the heat. He also has yet to answer the question: Was he the best choice to succeed Rick Adelman and guide the franchise into the next era?

If Kings president of basketball operations Geoff Petrie were an impulsive sort, he would be soliciting signatures for a recall as we speak.

Musselman's poll numbers are slipping fast. He was hired because of his youthful energy, enthusiasm and work ethic, because his former Golden State Warriors teams overachieved during his two seasons in Oakland, and because, well, because none of the defense-oriented superstars were available.

So far it isn't working. None of it. The offense, the defense. The relationships. Musselman, who signed a three-year deal, is 0-for-the-season in the front office and in the locker room.

"We've given him support from the beginning," said Petrie, "tried to comply with the things he wanted. We all felt going in that we could compete for a playoff spot. If we don't start winning soon . ... "

In other words, to figure into the team's short and long-term plans, Musselman, 41, better gain control of the situation soon. Even millionaires want returns on their investments. While Petrie and the Maloofs remain supportive, they hear rumblings that their young coach is intimidated by Bibby and Artest, that he refuses to define roles and demand compliance.

The end result is utter emotional stagnation, the players' revealing body language characterized by a set of permanently slumped shoulders. Furthermore, Musselman's own sideline demeanor is hardly inspirational; frowning, fretting, his hands often finding his face in frustration, his negative vibes appear to be spreading like a virus.

This is last winter with Adelman all over again, with one significant distinction: for a team to quit on a coach whose voice resonated for the better part of eight seasons is not only understandable, it's the NBA norm. The script gets old. The ears turn deaf. Owners routinely treat attention deficit disorder by firing coaches to avoid the widespread use of pharmaceuticals.

But a four-month tryout? Won't happen. Nor should it. Musselman deserves time to prove that he can command a huddle, that he gained from his experiences at Golden State without losing his nerve in the process, though this latest undertaking has been made more difficult by his own misjudgments.

Getting tagged with a DUI charge surely didn't elevate his stature as an authority figure within the locker room. Perhaps even more damaging is his failure to hire an elderly bench assistant to provide balance and perspective. A young Pat Riley had Bill Bertka. Phil Jackson had Tex Winter and Johnny Bach. Don Nelson had John Killilea. Gregg Popovich had Hank Egan. Avery Johnson has Del Harris ...

Musselman's staff by contrast is surprisingly young, with T.R. Dunn the oldest at 51. Nonetheless, in light of the schedule and the blown opportunities, they all better grow up soon.

http://www.sacbee.com/351/story/110954.html
 
Last edited:
I thought he had a two year deal. I do think Voisin may have an actual point in the final few paragraphs, most of his assistants are greener than he is. That isn't what I was expecting when he was hired and I'd like to see that change next season.
 
The point about the assistants is spot on. I'd really like to see Muss back on the Kings bench next year, but with a veteran assistant and maybe a good mig man coach (Vlade?) right there with him.
 
Second the motion on Vlade, of course.

I'm also still trying to figure out how anything was improved by replacing Pete Carril.
 
"We've given him support from the beginning," said Petrie, "tried to comply with the things he wanted. We all felt going in that we could compete for a playoff spot. If we don't start winning soon . ... "
http://www.sacbee.com/351/story/110954.html

I really want to know what comes after this ellipsis. If we don't start winning soon Musselman will get fired? If we don't start winning soon we'll rebuild? If we don't start winning soon the hen will point at the moon and look at its eggs?
 
Last edited:
Admitting that i'm not one of the interior pundits or technicians here i would still express frustration w/ the defensive schemes that Muss is coming up with. Have they changed much from Adelman's scheme. I wouldn't think so. I have always had frustration w/ doubling on the ball because the rotations are so weak, so terribly weak that we are literally giving open shots for most games.

Maybe it's magical thinkings to feel that man to man w/ rotations only off the screens is the best bet but maybe we just lack the personel to manage. I think i see it out there. But whatever Muss is doing on defense appears to be killing any chance of gaining an advantage on court. And a good defense supports a potent offense.

Is his defensive scheme any different than RA's and is there any viable way to get out of this scheme that tends to double the ball and leave way too many openings for the opposition...
 
^The schemes used to be different than Adelman's, and there was an actual strategy in place that was gimmicky but at least seemed to vaguely work against all but the best teams. The bigs fronted in the post, guards went under screens, penetration was limited and teams were forced to beat us with jump shots. The good shooting teams picked us apart, but it worked reasonably well.

Now there's basically no strategy except for the occasional zone. Artest freelances on defense, Bibby just doesn't play defense, Martin plays ok one on one defense but regularly loses track of his man, SAR stopped playing defense.... it's just an incoherent mishmash.

You'd think the offense and defense would look better as the season goes on as the team gels, but not so for this team.
 
I really want to know what comes after this ellipsis. If we don't start winning soon Musselman will get fired? If we don't start winning soon we'll rebuild? If we don't start winning soon the hen will point at the moon and look at its eggs?

OK, I just had to put that in my sig. :D
 
as much as i have stated how much i dont like what Musselman is doing, reading this article makes me look at the other side of things. he got thrown into a crap situation with a bunch of unhappy players. in that respect, i feel bad for him. but what i don't feel bad about is the fact that he's done nothing to make the situation better

i will say this. if GP and the Maloofs are smart enough to make the decision to rebuild, i would totally support keeping Muss for a few extra years. he'd need to bring in a better staff, obviously. but, if we're gonna suck for a few years while we develop a bunch of fresh, young guys, why not develop our young coach while we're at it?
 
as much as i have stated how much i dont like what Musselman is doing, reading this article makes me look at the other side of things. he got thrown into a crap situation with a bunch of unhappy players. in that respect, i feel bad for him. but what i don't feel bad about is the fact that he's done nothing to make the situation better

i will say this. if GP and the Maloofs are smart enough to make the decision to rebuild, i would totally support keeping Muss for a few extra years. he'd need to bring in a better staff, obviously. but, if we're gonna suck for a few years while we develop a bunch of fresh, young guys, why not develop our young coach while we're at it?
Are you kidding me???
The players weren't unhappy, until they started losing game after game...
After the end of last season, the team, and the fans had a very positive outlook toward this year. That attitude, and happiness continued right up until some of our earlier losing streaks.

If the idiot Maloof (way more money than brains) rich kids had just kept Adelman, things would be quite different right now. Artest loved him, as did all the other players. Wanna make your players unhappy??? Replace the coach that they love, and that helps them win, with a coach they don't respect, and that helps them to lose. Remember when Artest offered to give up half of his salary if the Kings kept Bonzi, and Adelman? Well they did neither... how do you think that affected him???

I hope that the Maloofs look to sell the team. They don't want to spend anymore money on this team (as apparent over the last few years) and they make very stupid decisions.

I had high hopes for Muss at the beginning of the year, but it has become blatantly obvious that he doesn't know what he is doing out there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Are you kidding me???
The players weren't unhappy, until they started losing game after game...
After the end of last season, the team, and the fans had a very positive outlook toward this year. That attitude, and happiness continued right up until some of our earlier losing streaks.

If the idiot Maloof (way more money than brains) rich kids had just kept Adelman, things would be quite different right now. Artest loved him, as did all the other players. Wanna make your players unhappy??? Replace the coach that they love, and that helps them win, with a coach they don't respect, and that helps them to lose. Remember when Artest offered to give up half of his salary if the Kings kept Bonzi, and Adelman? Well they did neither... how do you think that affected him???

I hope that the Maloofs look to sell the team. They don't want to spend anymore money on this team (as apparent over the last few years) and they make very stupid decisions.

I had high hopes for Muss at the beginning of the year, but it has become blatantly obvious that he doesn't know what he is doing out there.
i dont know what team you were watching last year, but we suck under Adelman until Artest came.

and i've already said a million times that Muss sucks with this group. he does not have the talent to command the respect of this group and lead them anywhere but the lottery. but, he has potential. and like i said before... if he had some veteran assistants and a young team that he could develop his own system with, then he could be a damn good coach.
 
i dont know what team you were watching last year, but we suck under Adelman until Artest came.

and i've already said a million times that Muss sucks with this group. he does not have the talent to command the respect of this group and lead them anywhere but the lottery. but, he has potential. and like i said before... if he had some veteran assistants and a young team that he could develop his own system with, then he could be a damn good coach.

I can't recall ever seeing a pro team trying to assemble players to develop a coach. Muss has a chance here to gain recognition as a competent leader who was able to work his way through a difficult period with a rebuilding team. Instead he is giving us the coaching equivalent of throwing gasoline on a fire. The old Kings house was in need of some maintenance, but now it's burning down.

By the way, did you recall Petrie's statement that "we tried to give Eric everything he said he needed at the start of the year"? I saw it in one of the posts. Sounds like GP is beginning to distance himself from the epicenter.
 
I believe the Maloofs think that they already are currently rebuilding...in a video i saw a couple months back, they talked about how they thought the team has a bright future, and "you have to get worse to get better."
 
I can't recall ever seeing a pro team trying to assemble players to develop a coach. Muss has a chance here to gain recognition as a competent leader who was able to work his way through a difficult period with a rebuilding team. Instead he is giving us the coaching equivalent of throwing gasoline on a fire. The old Kings house was in need of some maintenance, but now it's burning down.
we are NOT rebuilding. what i was saying was that if we were to rebuild (as in it blow it all to hell, rebuild) then that might be a great opportunity for Muss to develop as a coach. he is by no means my preferred coach but a full on rebuild might turn out to be great for him.
 
i dont know what team you were watching last year, but we suck under Adelman until Artest came.
goggles99 said:
After the end of last season, the team, and the fans had a very positive outlook toward this year
Why do I have to repeat myself here???? read two to three times if that is what it takes to comprehend what someone has posted, and before you reply to them. I was obviously talking about after Artest came along. The biggest reason that we sucked at the beginning of last year, is that Peja was a lame-duck. The player whom was supposed to "take over" and be "the man" after we got rid of Webber for a bag of moldy potato chips, ended up sneaking off into the corner and sniveling. That combined with horrible shooting by Bibby the first half of last year.
and i've already said a million times that Muss sucks with this group. he does not have the talent to command the respect of this group and lead them anywhere but the lottery
Why does Muss suck with group, when Adelman had great success with them? Muss just isn't a good coach period. I don't want a coach that may or may not "learn" how to coach us while our team is falling apart. That is the kind of coach that belongs at some obscure college as a head coach.
if he had some veteran assistants and a young team that he could develop his own system with, then he could be a damn good coach.
You want a coach that has to develop a system? Who would be crazy enough to hire a head coach that has no system??? Oh yeah :( the Maloofs
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why do I have to repeat myself here???? read two to three times if that is what it takes to comprehend what someone has posted, and before you reply to them. I was obviously talking about after Artest came along. The biggest reason that we sucked at the beginning of last year, is that Peja was a lame-duck. The player whom was supposed to "take over" and be "the man" after we got rid of Webber for a bag of moldy potato chips, ended up sneaking off into the corner and sniveling. That combined with horrible shooting by Bibby the first half of last year.

Dude, no need to get your feathers ruffled... Those kinds of comments are NOT appropriate here. We're a friendly group and you can respond without the attitude.

...Oh yeah :( the Maloofs

Note that I've corrected - again - the spelling of the owners' names.
 
Back
Top