Different type of player.
Hey a fellow Hawkeye fan! I used to hate on the Clones as a kid but started rooting for them (unless they played Iowa of course) when they had Marcus Fizer and Jamal Tinsley.
Fun year to be a Hawk fan with Garza!
Yep.
Buddy has an elite in-demand skill, but is not a well-rounded player and seems to do little that "doesn't show up in the stat sheet".
Haliburton doesn't have an obvious elite skill (perhaps passing) but is very well-rounded, does a ton of stuff that doesn't show up in the stat sheet, seems to know how to be in the right place at the right time, does a good job taking care of the ball and making smart plays, and just generally sparkplugs the team.
So, Haliburton is already more effective at quite a few important aspects of basketball, but he's not the floor-spreading shooter that Buddy is, and I don't think he ever will be. Neither of them is a post player, a post defender, a rebounder, or a shot blocker. There are a lot of roles in the NBA, and you have five players on the court to fill them. In the end, I think a successful modern NBA team needs to have both players - a Haliburton and a Buddy - as well as players to fill several other roles.
I think the problem that people have with Buddy is his contract. Sure, he's in a shooting slump, but I think most of us here expect him to shake out of it eventually. If Buddy was being paid 2/3 of what he's actually getting, people would probably see him in a different light. Rather than look at Buddy in terms of what he brings to the team, he is being seen in the light of how he restricts team flexibility on the salary end of things. But, hey, now we've got Haliburton on the cheap for the duration of Buddy's contract, so it might not be such a big deal to have paid the "Sacramento Tax" to keep our elite shooter.
This conversation may take an interesting twist in a few years when Buddy is making under $20M and Fox is making over $30M.
Buddy’s contract hurts his trade value, but it has no impact on my assessment of his play. When he’s on, he’s an elite 3 point shooter.
Only a matter of time before Hali starts over Buddy.
Even if he is a one trick pony, that trick is worth a lot of cash. See Bertans and Joe Harris.
I keep Haliburton in the second unit this year just to keep the peace. Starting is mostly an ego thing, it’s minutes and closing that matters.
Once we start winning consistently, lineups will take care of themselves.
No argument from me.Dare I say he runs the point better than Fox?
Different type of player.Dare I say he runs the point better than Fox?
Different type of player.
Which begs the question, is Fox better suited long term as our starting two guard?Been saying since preseason that Tyrese is the best PG on the team. Not a knock on Fox, but Fox is in the mold of the modern day scoring guard. Tyrese is a classic Chris Paul, Jason Kidd type of guard.
Which begs the question, is Fox better suited long term as our starting two guard?
Say it with me...1..2...3...Tyrese rocks!Who cares; say it with me!
“POSITIONLESS BASKETBALL!”
Which begs the question, is Fox better suited long term as our starting two guard?
I wouldn’t call it good fortune as much as having someone competent making decisions finally.Its nice to see the Kings with good fortune in the lottery.
Halliburton kinda reminds me of a smaller Tatum on Boston a bit although more a playmaker than scorer - he also reminds of former Mark Jackson some.
I wouldn’t call it good fortune as much as having someone competent making decisions finally.
Halliburton kinda reminds me of a smaller Tatum on Boston a bit although more a playmaker than scorer - he also reminds of former Mark Jackson some.
What do you mean? People are not falling over themselves spamming hot takes, just feels like a breath of fresh air to see the kid out there quarterbacking.People need to slow down on Haliburton. Yes he's had a great impact, but it's only been 6 games and there is little to no film on him. Let's see what happens at the end of the year.
I get that. I’m talking purely running point and setting up teammates
Is it not too early to say MVP of the 2027 season? In all seriousness i do think he can be ROY. First ROY for us since another Ty, but for some reason I have a better feeling about this Ty. I think his game translates to winning vs the individual stats we've seen with others.People need to slow down on Haliburton. Yes he's had a great impact, but it's only been 6 games and there is little to no film on him. Let's see what happens at the end of the year.
People need to slow down on Haliburton. Yes he's had a great impact, but it's only been 6 games and there is little to no film on him. Let's see what happens at the end of the year.
People need to slow down on Haliburton. Yes he's had a great impact, but it's only been 6 games and there is little to no film on him. Let's see what happens at the end of the year.
Is it not too early to say MVP of the 2027 season? In all seriousness i do think he can be ROY.