The Boogie Man

Bottom line is, people wanted him gone and in large degree it had a lot to do with his demeanor on the court which is one of the reasons they thought you could not build a winner around him.

Both arguments are ridiculously flawed and based on unsubstantiated bullpoopoo. He gets a bad rep because he has been on bad team with an unprecedented lack of talent around him. His demeanor is no different to KG's except KG is a winner and Cousins is someone that you can't build a winner around. He has less ejections this year that Blake Griffin who those that want Cousins gone get all flustered when his name is brought up.

DeMarcus Cousins is THE best big man in the league bar none and he is precisely the type of player you build around. Back in the days when the league had genuine big men, DeMarcus Cousins is the type of player you dream about getting. In the modern game, where the game has evolved to small ball only because there are no genuine big men out there that you can jump on their shoulders and let them carry you home, people get infatuated with the prettiness of shooting 3PT and run and gun basketball and forget that the absolutely hardest position to fill in the entire league is a superstar big men. Cousins, when at his best is absolutely a top 5 player in the NBA and that is ABSOLUTELY the player you build around. In the play off series when the jump shots stop falling, give me an un-guardable big man like DMC to terrorize in the low post any day of the week.

Well I have no issue with what you say in this post is the bottom-line. I'm simply nitpicking that demeanor ON COURT/ ability to win and "(locker room) cancer"/ all those sarcastic remarks about Cousins being a puppy-stomper and wife-beater are separate issues, and I want to make sure that distinction is made because for the most part, rational fans aren't critical of Cousins as a person. Nobody in their right mind questions his loyalty to the team and his contributions to the community, kids etc. So when we talk about fans being dumb for wanting to trade Cousins, let's not lump the rational ones who are talking about doing so for basketball reasons with the one or two trolls who want to do so because Cousins is some thug.

As for the bolded part ... let's wait and see, keeping in mind that Cousins is also not your prototypical superstar low post big man. His versatility is what will allow him to win IMO, so it's not as simple as saying "Old way with big GOOD, small ball 3 point shooting BAD!".
 
Minor bone to pick here.

People don't realize how much harder the game is for big guys. Partly because how their bodies are built, but also because they actually travel farther (basket to basket, rather than backcourt to backcourt).

Little guys just have a lot less mass to move around relative to their cardio-vascular system. The ratio of body weight to heart/lung size is a lot smaller. With basically the same size engine, a 270 lb guy has to feed a lot more muscle. Big guys will ALWAYS look more gassed. And physically they are. And there's no way around. It's NOT because they are "lazy". Even though they look gassed, they are actually working a lot harder on the inside to move all those cells and provide the body with oxygen. Higher oxygen demand at the cells with the same size cardio system supplying it.

At a certain point you just have to trust the our guys are giving it their all, no matter how they "look" to our eye. DMC has more than proved himself to be a hard worker, and has earned the benefit of the doubt. Also, it is a long season, so it takes a toll on big guys more than it does little guys, so I also trust that Cousins to himself (don't knock it, the Spurs do it and have been since before they were so old).
TL;DR

Kareem said it best:
;)
 
Quite possibly, he would have melted down, the frustration of carrying the load, getting hammered and no one else (in his mind) going to battle with him..... The real DeMarcus is, transparently, the same as this DeMarcus. He wants to win. He is frustrated by losing, he is frustrated by injustice, he has a passion and will to win, that will never change, nor should we want it to...... Now, he has partners in crime, people he believes in, trust. Will he lose his cool at an inopportune time in the future? You bet your freaking azz he will...... with the improved play of the TEAM, it shouldn't have as much impact. He should never have been carrying an entire dysfunctional no talent, no direction team in the first place......... that is really beyond expectations for even a seasoned player.
He has taken the brunt of an emotional, battle scarred and bi-polar fan base and weathered each storm with aplomb, remains fiercely loyal to this city and this franchise in a day and age where there is NO loyalty in sports. We are seeing something so special here.
 
And yes, there is/has been an anti-Boogie crowd. Mysteriously, they seem to have disappeared. Wonder why that is? :p

Its because I'm off chasing them through the bushes with a big stick. :p

But alas, that will have to end here sooner or later. As will my constantly mocking the ridiculous focus on technicals, demeanor, and cap it off stupidity of the "trade him!" movement, which btw reached such heights on the "other board" that something like 70% of the know-nothings voted to dump Boogie back around the new year.

That crap pissed me off in an enormous way, and I came this close to creating an incendiary thread that would have irradiated half the Kingdom and made the return and recovery of various people who got caught up in that stupid wake impossible. Luckily I held my keyboard and decided to let Boogie do the talking, and just contented myself in trying to reach out to Kings figures behind the scenes and let them know that wasn't how everybody felt.

In any case, people were flat ****ing wrong. And that is ego bruising. There is already, and will in upcoming months be, a lot of transparent excuses and nuances made about how they were actually right, but are happy because Boogie has changed just the way they said he needed to etc.. I will withhold my fire on most of those claims simply because they are a necessary step in people getting back onboard the wagon they just dove off of. Whatever it takes, and whatever stupidity was done, people have to have a safe route back without being more than gently chided or ego comes into play.

There's got to be some lessons learned in all this nonsense though. HAVE to be. Spoken or unspoken, people have to learn form this crap:

1) you don't trade your in prime superstar. YOU DON'T.

2) you don't turn on somebody who has been uncommmonlyy and unrequitedly loyal to your franchise. You don't. That's then you being disloyal and ungrateful. Its a bad look. And a guy getting a technical is not him being disloyal to you or anybody else.

3) you DON'T quit, you DON'T run, you DON'T panic. Panicking is for cowards. You hang tough. That may be my own personal creed, but I think a lot of panicked herds and movements could be saved by people adopting some of it. You hang in there. When the lemmings start running for the cliff, you pump the brakes and say what the hell?

4) Grant Napear and his ****ing radio goons are not righteous people. National media figures looking for hits and drama are doing so for selfish reasons. The truth is not of primary interest to these people. Following them is like following any demagogue -- a sign of weakness or gullibility. They only have power through you. They only have power if you buy in and do their dirty work for them.


Now the team is turning. I told you so's are warranted. For the most part they won't be coming. People need to dust themselves off, climb back on board and see where this goes. For all the splinter movements, I have to say that George Karl is almost surely going to be here, and if we carry this winning on into the next month before that brutal streak, Rudy and Ben likely are too, although a little of that will depend on how aggressive a GM Vlade turns out to be. Our last GM was a geeky little fool with no people sense, and he disrupted a good thing forming up right at a critical moment because he didn't understand this is a people business, not a numbers business. Vlade is highly unlikely to make that same mistake. If he makes a move it will have to be small enough and safe enough he is sure we can absorb it. When a team is coming together and starting to win you don't screw with its cohesion.
 
Last edited:
Sometimes I think we Fans forget NBA Basketball is an extremely physical punishing game. The target of the most physical violence is often a teams top scorer. Especially if that Player operates down in the paint where Boogie does most of his work. Boogie can dish out the punishment but make no mistake he is absorbing blow after blow.

Showing some emotion and an occasional technical foul is expected. I would prefer the Head Coach to raise hell with the Refs because honestly I think he would be missed less if he was ejected or forced to miss a game.

Here is a Top Ten list of the Players with the most technical fouls so far this season:

Draymond Green 11
DeMarcus Cousins 9
Marcus Morris 9
Dwight Howard 8
DeAndre Jordan 8
Kyle Lowry 8
Chris Paul 7
Blake Griffin 7
Andre Drummond 6
Paul George 6

That list is all Big Men who make their living in the paint outside of Lowry, CP3 and PG who are Team Leaders. Hell the Clippers have THREE guys in the Top Ten and Blake has been sitting for weeks!!!!

Stats came from here----> http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/player/_/stat/fouls/sort/technicalFouls

One word of caution I would share is that I don't see a Spur in the Top 30!!!
 
All this has proven is the critics right. Everything they criticized has been altered, proving them correct.

1. Boogie's attitude can drag the team down with him.

What has happened in 2016? Boogie's presence has notably been more positive, and while he still has been frustrated at certain points in games, he's been very much upbeat, smiling, and positive. We are seeing his positive aura impact his team rather than a ying/yang where you don't know if he's going to help his team or kill their spirit. So far, this year we've seen a change.

2. Boogie's play style. Critics were worried his perimeter focus was starting to dominate his style, causing his inefficient offense to remain that way, place him out of position for rebounds on offense, and overall lead one of the most dominant post players to nullify his biggest advantage.

What has happened in 2016? We've seen him take less 3's, and balance his game with the face-up attack along with posting guys up and working on the block. This is why his efficiency has skyrocketed in 2016, where he's shooting 50% from the field (.588 TS%), he went from taking 5 3PTA in November to 3 a game, and paired with WCS on the frontline has transitioned back to a power player down low.

The two main complaint about Boogie that was leading to him not performing up to his potential (and thus the team's) is changing since the new year. Now, if the things that were happening in November and December were to continue, then perhaps you would still see his critics, but the fact is that the points made by his critics were accurate, and seemingly are being addressed.
 
prophet: "In any case, people were flat ****ing wrong. And that is ego bruising. There is already, and will in upcoming months be, a lot of transparent excuses and nuances made about how they were actually right, but are happy because Boogie has changed just the way they said he needed to etc.. "

LOL
 
prophet: "In any case, people were flat ****ing wrong. And that is ego bruising. There is already, and will in upcoming months be, a lot of transparent excuses and nuances made about how they were actually right, but are happy because Boogie has changed just the way they said he needed to etc.. "

LOL
I don't see how this is any blow to critics. If anything, it proves them 100% correct, because it implied a change, but if they were wrong, then no change would exist. Everybody admits 2016 is a different Cousins than we saw in 2015, but if there was nothing wrong to begin with, we wouldn't be recognizing said changes. Oops!
 
I don't see how this is any blow to critics. If anything, it proves them 100% correct, because it implied a change, but if they were wrong, then no change would exist. Everybody admits 2016 is a different Cousins than we saw in 2015, but if there was nothing wrong to begin with, we wouldn't be recognizing said changes. Oops!

Spin is a wonderful thing.
 
I don't see how this is any blow to critics. If anything, it proves them 100% correct, because it implied a change, but if they were wrong, then no change would exist. Everybody admits 2016 is a different Cousins than we saw in 2015, but if there was nothing wrong to begin with, we wouldn't be recognizing said changes. Oops!

2015-2016 Boogie has a better team to play with and a Man with a steady hand on the rudder in the Front Office named Vlade Divac. I will submit the changes are less about Boogie and more about those around him:)
 
Spin is a wonderful thing.
Logic = spin in cognitive dissonance.

Those who dismissed any criticisms of Cousins are in a very tough spot now, because they cannot accept they were wrong about his deficiencies, and yet they must now admit that he's playing at another level due to those areas his critics pointed out being addressed. In order to justify his play, they must admit they were wrong, however cognitive dissonance will not allow that.

The fact is Cousins a great talent, but in order to get to the next level, he needed to make further adjustments to his game, and the critics were not seeing those adjustments being made, and under Karl some thought he was regressing. He's shored up those areas and is now playing the best basketball of anybody so far. He is becoming what his critics were waiting for him to become.
 
2015-2016 Boogie has a better team to play with and a Man with a steady hand on the rudder in the Front Office named Vlade Divac. I will submit the changes are less about Boogie and more about those around him:)
I disagree. His surrounding talent wasn't forcing him to jack up ill-advised perimeter jumpers and neglect the post. In fact, during his recent tear, the only improvement from other players is WCS. Casspi got hurt, and hasn't returned to his former self yet. Gay has been out. Marco has been incredibly bad recently, and overall the lineups still are dealing with inconsistency from the SG spot. Overall, the guys surrounding DMC have still been up and down all year, but we've seen a different Demarcus this new year.
 
Logic = spin in cognitive dissonance.

Those who dismissed any criticisms of Cousins are in a very tough spot now, because they cannot accept they were wrong about his deficiencies, and yet they must now admit that he's playing at another level due to those areas his critics pointed out being addressed. In order to justify his play, they must admit they were wrong, however cognitive dissonance will not allow that.

The fact is Cousins a great talent, but in order to get to the next level, he needed to make further adjustments to his game, and the critics were not seeing those adjustments being made, and under Karl some thought he was regressing. He's shored up those areas and is now playing the best basketball of anybody so far. He is becoming what his critics were waiting for him to become on another team.

Completed your last sentence to include the majority of Cousins critics over the past couple of months.
 
People still making this out to be a Cousins v Karl thing. Drop it guys. No one ever doubted Cousins' talent, only his resolve. I feel the promise of Cousins play and demeanor in January, but I am cautious for the long run ahead. Both parties deserve props. This team wouldn't be here without George Karl. This team wouldn't be here without Demarcus Cousins.
 
Completed your last sentence to include the majority of Cousins critics over the past couple of months.


This being the issue where a line was crossed.

I started numerous threads and posts about the weird put the big man at the 3pt stripe strategy. It was a concern. He had a bad December, it was a concern. Why? Was the experiment failing? Many questions, many concerns.

HE"S A LOSER, WE CAN NEVER WIN WITH HIM, HE'S A CANCER, I"M EMBARRASSED, TRADE HIM!!!! = unacceptable. And as mentioned, best forgotten. When a family member forgets to lock the bathroom door and you walk in on them looking at girls mags/sites on their tablet, you close the door, and the less its mentioned the better. Oops. But polite amnesia is the best policy all around. That's us on this issue. Onward ho. Just tell me you washed your hands before you came back.

Of course on the other hand I won't forgive the ringleaders. Grant Napear can go **** himself. And he's damn lucky Boogie isn't my client, because just as soon as Boogie broke down that playoff door, racking up All Star and All NBAs along the way, and we began to talk about another contract, I'd make it damn clear one backstabbing weasel that we wanted gone and banished to Siberia before we progressed any further. You don't mess with me or my clients when I have the stick.
 
Last edited:
I disagree. His surrounding talent wasn't forcing him to jack up ill-advised perimeter jumpers and neglect the post. In fact, during his recent tear, the only improvement from other players is WCS. Casspi got hurt, and hasn't returned to his former self yet. Gay has been out. Marco has been incredibly bad recently, and overall the lineups still are dealing with inconsistency from the SG spot. Overall, the guys surrounding DMC have still been up and down all year, but we've seen a different Demarcus this new year.

You are welcome to disagree. The team I am watching has been playing better defense. I think the team is starting to play better together. IMO part of this is playing a bigger lineup. Also I think Boogie is less banged up. Rondo is playing great.
 
Napear seems to always have good things to say about Cousins on TV and compliments him every chance he gets.

On his radio show, he's more critical, but that probably to garner more attention.
 
Is this good?
screen-shot-2016-01-24-at-6-26-47-pm.png
Impossible?
Boogie is the only one who listed twice on that list.
 
Cousins has always taken the responsibility for the team winning or losing. I'm sure he knows he will not go down in history as a great player unless his teams win. With lousy ownership, a parade of sub prime coaches and not the best of surrounding casts, he hasn't had a chance yet he accepted the blame.

In an interview a few days ago he was asked how it felt being on a team that could play. Implied in that was the team had a good coach and ownership or at least a great GM. You could see by the look on his face that he felt relieved of a burden. As fans some us have felt he should do more. Those of us who backed him are called apologists. The fact is, and indeed I see it as a fact, he didn't have a chance. Now he is still THE man on a team that might be better than it is showing and he is in a good spot.

Perhaps that realization hit him around the the entrance into 2016. He now can be a stud and see it pay off in wins. The unreasonable expectations are no longer present because if he plays well, we tend to win. He knows he is now part of an organization headed on the way up. He had pledged to stay here no matter what but for the longest time that must have seemed like a sentence to perpetual hell. No more. I think that's why he smiles.
 
All this has proven is the critics right. Everything they criticized has been altered, proving them correct.

1. Boogie's attitude can drag the team down with him.

What has happened in 2016? Boogie's presence has notably been more positive, and while he still has been frustrated at certain points in games, he's been very much upbeat, smiling, and positive. We are seeing his positive aura impact his team rather than a ying/yang where you don't know if he's going to help his team or kill their spirit. So far, this year we've seen a change.

2. Boogie's play style. Critics were worried his perimeter focus was starting to dominate his style, causing his inefficient offense to remain that way, place him out of position for rebounds on offense, and overall lead one of the most dominant post players to nullify his biggest advantage.

What has happened in 2016? We've seen him take less 3's, and balance his game with the face-up attack along with posting guys up and working on the block. This is why his efficiency has skyrocketed in 2016, where he's shooting 50% from the field (.588 TS%), he went from taking 5 3PTA in November to 3 a game, and paired with WCS on the frontline has transitioned back to a power player down low.

The two main complaint about Boogie that was leading to him not performing up to his potential (and thus the team's) is changing since the new year. Now, if the things that were happening in November and December were to continue, then perhaps you would still see his critics, but the fact is that the points made by his critics were accurate, and seemingly are being addressed.

Good post. Overall Cousins attitude had been a lot better this year. But he has made a couple of public gafs with calling out the coach earlier in the year and the temper tantrum at GSW. Combine that with all the history from the past and I think it was justified for Kings fans to be fed up. I don't think there are many fans who don't think Cousins is a great player and want him as a King. They just want him to live up to his potential. Maybe the fans who where bashing the coach all year could give him some credit now. If the Kings continue to rise.... Who knows, coach of the year????
 
I do love the "See, he did what we said he needed to do and now it's ok" folks. It was just valid criticism and all that. Bullcrap! Folks wanted him gone. Very clearly. That was the sentiment. Anywhere but here. And the media led the way, and folks here followed, but by no means as badly as other local web sites, who were majority in favor of trading him. 64% on sactownroyalty wanted to TRADE him. Not change his attitude, get in shape, smile more, pet puppies, or take better shots. TRADE HIM.

http://www.sactownroyalty.com/2015/...hould-the-kings-move-on-from-demarcus-cousins

Here's but one example from KingsFans.

"I have a news flash for Mr. DeMarcus Cousins, your no leader, and your not a role model, and I'm done with you. I have gone from being his biggest advocate to caring less if he ever plays another game for the Kings. The end doesn't always justify the means. Character matters to me, and Cousins needs a huge doze of it. This how I feel right now. I'm angry and fed up. I'm tired of hearing about Cousins. I'll tell you one thing for sure. Patting him on the butt, and telling him it's alright, everything is going to be OK isn't going to change a damm thing. Who knows, maybe in a day or two, I'll feel different about everything. I think I'm getting too old for this crap."
 
Good post. Overall Cousins attitude had been a lot better this year. But he has made a couple of public gafs with calling out the coach earlier in the year and the temper tantrum at GSW. Combine that with all the history from the past and I think it was justified for Kings fans to be fed up. I don't think there are many fans who don't think Cousins is a great player and want him as a King. They just want him to live up to his potential. Maybe the fans who where bashing the coach all year could give him some credit now. If the Kings continue to rise.... Who knows, coach of the year????

Be careful what you wish for:) The last time George Karl was named COY he was fired:eek:

Karl has changed his lineups and rotations. Also the pace is often slowed down. Karl is the Head Coach, but the Players and other Coaches have also played a role in developing what works best for these Kings. If this latest run of success continues Coach Karl and his Assistants, Vlade and the rest of the Front Office and the Sacramento Kings Players all deserve "some credit".

Cousins has been beasting racking up the scoring and rebounds. Just truly putting on an All Star performance night after night. I sometimes think us Kings Fans do not appreciate what we are seeing the young player do.

For me from my little Fan perspective Rajon Rondo has played a huge role in all of this. He is cranking out Triple Doubles as if he were a machine. His voice is a constant guidance to his team mates. His assists are a thing of beauty for a basketball geek like me, His driving to the rim breaks down the other teams defense and he gets in the paint to scuffle for rebounds.

Watching Rajon Rondo be the Floor General he is reminds me of Coach Pete Carril's often repeated quote of his Father:
“The strong take from the weak, but the smart take from the strong.” So said Pete Carril’s father, a Spanish immigrant who worked for thirty-nine years in a Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, steel mill.

The Kings are going to need to be smart like Pete Carril's teams to get past the NBA powerhouses.
 
Be careful what you wish for:) The last time George Karl was named COY he was fired:eek:

Karl has changed his lineups and rotations. Also the pace is often slowed down. Karl is the Head Coach, but the Players and other Coaches have also played a role in developing what works best for these Kings. If this latest run of success continues Coach Karl and his Assistants, Vlade and the rest of the Front Office and the Sacramento Kings Players all deserve "some credit".

Cousins has been beasting racking up the scoring and rebounds. Just truly putting on an All Star performance night after night. I sometimes think us Kings Fans do not appreciate what we are seeing the young player do.

For me from my little Fan perspective Rajon Rondo has played a huge role in all of this. He is cranking out Triple Doubles as if he were a machine. His voice is a constant guidance to his team mates. His assists are a thing of beauty for a basketball geek like me, His driving to the rim breaks down the other teams defense and he gets in the paint to scuffle for rebounds.

Watching Rajon Rondo be the Floor General he is reminds me of Coach Pete Carril's often repeated quote of his Father:
“The strong take from the weak, but the smart take from the strong.” So said Pete Carril’s father, a Spanish immigrant who worked for thirty-nine years in a Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, steel mill.

The Kings are going to need to be smart like Pete Carril's teams to get past the NBA powerhouses.

I can't say I'm worried about the HC being fired at this point. I agree everyone deserves credit. Even the head coach.
 
I do love the "See, he did what we said he needed to do and now it's ok" folks. It was just valid criticism and all that. Bullpoopoo! Folks wanted him gone. Very clearly. That was the sentiment. Anywhere but here. And the media led the way, and folks here followed, but by no means as badly as other local web sites, who were majority in favor of trading him. 64% on sactownroyalty wanted to TRADE him. Not change his attitude, get in shape, smile more, pet puppies, or take better shots. TRADE HIM.

http://www.sactownroyalty.com/2015/...hould-the-kings-move-on-from-demarcus-cousins

Here's but one example from KingsFans.

"I have a news flash for Mr. DeMarcus Cousins, your no leader, and your not a role model, and I'm done with you. I have gone from being his biggest advocate to caring less if he ever plays another game for the Kings. The end doesn't always justify the means. Character matters to me, and Cousins needs a huge doze of it. This how I feel right now. I'm angry and fed up. I'm tired of hearing about Cousins. I'll tell you one thing for sure. Patting him on the butt, and telling him it's alright, everything is going to be OK isn't going to change a damm thing. Who knows, maybe in a day or two, I'll feel different about everything. I think I'm getting too old for this crap."

"Folks wanted him gone. Very clearly. That was the sentiment."

Absolutely correct.
Im sorry to harp on this subject but the "mob gathered with pitchforks" mentality that had reached a fevered pitch was disturbing to me. It smacked of straight ignorance to want to trade Demarcus. Sorry to be so blunt.

Grant and the trade boogie crowd were gathering around the "what's the one constant on this team? Boogie. He's never gotten us more than 30 wins and he needs to go."
I just can't wrap my head around that way of thinking. As if the kings org has been a pilar of strength and consistency and we have had a parade of quality players playing here. DeMarcus was the scapegoat for everything that has gone wrong with this mess of a franchise and in my humble opinion it just wasn't fair whatsoever.
Additionally, I don't think DMC has changed, as some here are saying. He's keeping his emotions in check. He hasn't changed. I don't want him to change. We saw a different attitude from demarcus a couple weeks back where he was smiling a lot and being very passive on the court. It only lasted a couple of games but it was very odd to me. He almost seemed to have lost the passion for a couple of games. That was a boogie that had seemed to change and I didn't like it.
Some here might want him to change. I don't. Im willing to take the good with the bad because the good is oh so very good.
 
Last edited:
All this has proven is the critics right. Everything they criticized has been altered, proving them correct.

Exactly. Valid criticism focuses on play on floor and ability to keep his poise in critical moments. Losing cool in crunch time makes you error prone and susceptible to quick shots and bad passes....and we saw Boogie do that in 7-8 games in December..... winnable games that were given away with his assistance.

The hardline defenders of Boogie can't seem to see this nuance. When things go bad it is the system or the coach and when things go good it is all him?! You can't have it both ways. You can't take all the credit when things go well and be absolved of all blame when things go poorly.

This is not anti-Boogie rant because I love the guy. It is just objective analysis. 20/10 and 39% FGs and constant foul trouble in December compared 32/14 and 50% FGs in January is because (1) improved health (2) improved confidence (3) improved decision-making.

If we are going to give credit Boogie for improvement, do we just excuse his performance prior to improvement? And guess what? It wasn't the coach or the system that was holding Boogie because none of that has changed. As great as Boogie has been lately, and he has been MVP great, the guy still has weaknesses:

(1) Below average post game. No reliable move with back to basket against equal size defender.
(2) Turnover prone. Can force plays when double team comes.
(3) Foul prone. Reaches too often and gambles too often.
(4) Temper. Anger and loss of cool hinders judgment.

These are minor quibbles and shortcomings in the context of being a Top 5 talent in NBA (Curry, Durant, LeBron, Boogie, Westbrook) that will be put to the test as he plays the most important games of his career to lead team to playoffs for first time in decade.

But a lot of fans read this and say "oh yeah look where we would be without him!" without recognizing where we are now vs. a month ago directly correlates to the strides he has made to minimize the above weaknesses and maximize his many strengths.

Credit and discredit is due proportionate to his dominant role on the team. That is the case now as it was in December and as it will be in March. :)
 
Back
Top