And who's going to give assets for an $11mil Reke? He got 1 offer in FA.
You know the value of players can change over time. Especially young ones.
And who's going to give assets for an $11mil Reke? He got 1 offer in FA.
And who's going to give assets for an $11mil Reke? He got 1 offer in FA.
You know the value of players can change over time. Especially young ones.
That's not the issue though. He was saying we match Reke then immediately go shop him. Why would teams go offer us ANYTHING of value when all we clearly want to do is get rid of him?
So, with that in mind, if we match, we were locked in to at least a year of Reke. In which he 1. Blows up and thus no reason to trade him or 2. Shows he's not worth his contract and non one wants to touch his $11mil deal.
Mediocrity. Gotta get there first before we win the finals. First step, mediocrity.
right, you were asking for an example of a player signing a big contract and being traded that very season. there was one recently: Nene, in Denver, under a front office prominently featuring our current gm.
There is no difference between a bad team and a mediocre team. The only difference in sports teams are contenders and non-contenders.
The moves PDA has made so far would be brilliant, if the Kings had the Heat roster - instead of Reke it was Chalmers and sign Landry to replace Haslem. Instead we have a roster of 2 young potential stars, Reke and DMC, and everyone else. PDA for rid of one star for a piece + cap space, then use that cap space for another piece. He added two more people to the "everyone else" category and left Kings with one star.
These are moves that won't be making Kings contenders. No one will be DYING to come to the play for the Kings with the roster constructed as of now. D12 picked Rockets because of James Harden, a star. Not because they have Garcia and Asik.
I wouldn't call JaVale McGee a return you actually want
Wrong way wrong. The difference between being a first round and out and 2nd round and out playoff team is huge profitability vs not making the playoffs.
Here is my problem with this. If we felt Reke could only play sg and we drafted Mac because he was our guy, why not match Reke and look for the best possible deal with any team around the league. It's unlikely Vasquez was the best offer you'd get as there are many teams that couldn't bid on him as a rfa but would still want him, especially now that the free agent pool has dried up.
Instead we let him go since he would be redundant and not part of our future plans then picked up a different, less talented redundant piece where what's left will be even harder to trade.
So what's better, dumping Reke for Vasquez/Landry and now trying to unload our garbage or
Matching for Reke and using him as the trade bait?
To me it's an issue of maximizing assets and we didn't do that.
If make the playoffs, you are contending.
But if you want to talk about profitability, what will sell more tickets: A lineup of Reke/BMC/Iggy/JT/DMC or Vasquez/BMC/Salmons/JT/DMC? Which players would sell more jerseys?