CruzDude said:
I guess the view is that it's easier to move one of three $6.5m contracts than to move one $20m that is partially damaged goods.
I think Petrie is satisified with KT and Skinner and Corliss is the ultimate good guy no matter the circumstance and is great in locker room (so I guess and from what little I hear). KT continues to get 14/10 most nights (and will hopefully cut down dum TO's) and is a keeper now with Artest. Skinner is a much better defender than Miller but not much scoring. Corliss is used where the matchups make sense and is a really good presence on the bench.
So don't think Petrie is trying to move any of those tho' Corliss can fit in several other places better than here, where they need a low post banger and 8-10 pts a night. What do we really need other than time to play together?
With SAR, Cisco, Skinner and Price off the bench, they are doing quite well, most of the time. They all need some consistency
But when Geoff is ready to deal, having 3 pieces at $6.5m or so will be much easier than one partially damaged $20m.
I think Petrie is satisified with KT and Skinner and Corliss is the ultimate good guy no matter the circumstance and is great in locker room (so I guess and from what little I hear). KT continues to get 14/10 most nights (and will hopefully cut down dum TO's) and is a keeper now with Artest. Skinner is a much better defender than Miller but not much scoring. Corliss is used where the matchups make sense and is a really good presence on the bench.
So don't think Petrie is trying to move any of those tho' Corliss can fit in several other places better than here, where they need a low post banger and 8-10 pts a night. What do we really need other than time to play together?
With SAR, Cisco, Skinner and Price off the bench, they are doing quite well, most of the time. They all need some consistency
But when Geoff is ready to deal, having 3 pieces at $6.5m or so will be much easier than one partially damaged $20m.