The Ammick tweet says he has been hired as Gm and this says head of basketball operations. I take it he reports to Vivek directly as opposed to a head of basketball operations and then the Gm directly below like in Denver?
Yup. The last thing we need is another Vlade/Williams situation.Both tweets said the same sources spoke to both of them (at least how that’s I read it), so it’s maybe it’s just one position? Could be just miscommunication but I’d honestly be happier if GM + head of basketball ops was one position. No need for room for more drama
Trying to read some background on the new guy in regards to identifying talent. Back in 2016, he said they would rely on the scouts but then with data and analytics would bump guys/prospects up or down.
Until I see any proof or examples of him involved in identifying draftable and undrafted rookie free agents, I’m concerned. I don’t doubt the analytics part but......I don’t know
Trying to read some background on the new guy in regards to identifying talent. Back in 2016, he said they would rely on the scouts but then with data and analytics would bump guys/prospects up or down.
Until I see any proof or examples of him involved in identifying draftable and undrafted rookie free agents, I’m concerned. I don’t doubt the analytics part but......I don’t know
Trying to read some background on the new guy in regards to identifying talent. Back in 2016, he said they would rely on the scouts but then with data and analytics would bump guys/prospects up or down.
Until I see any proof or examples of him involved in identifying draftable and undrafted rookie free agents, I’m concerned. I don’t doubt the analytics part but......I don’t know
Trying to read some background on the new guy in regards to identifying talent. Back in 2016, he said they would rely on the scouts but then with data and analytics would bump guys/prospects up or down.
Until I see any proof or examples of him involved in identifying draftable and undrafted rookie free agents, I’m concerned. I don’t doubt the analytics part but......I don’t know
D'alessandro was more pure idiot than anything else...Scouts + analytics is the way it should be. The Kings went from pure stats (Pete D) to pure gut feel (Vlade). If McNair is able to merge both, I’m all for it.
After reading the link, and see all the moves he was responsible or partly responsible for, honestly it looks like a bunch of shuffling deck chairs in a majority of deals and then there are the huge deals going after the superstars for the Houston roster.....and we will never ever be able to pull off one of those deals.For those wanting to know about McNair a bit more
https://kingsherald.com/articles/kings-gm-candidate-profile-monte-mcnair/
After reading the link, and see all the moves he was responsible or partly responsible for, honestly it looks like a bunch of shuffling deck chairs in a majority of deals and then there are the huge deals going after the superstars for the Houston roster.....and we will never ever be able to pull off one of those deals.
And then with analytics being his deal, maybe someone can point out where it actually helped them in bringing in young talent.
These deals and signings look just like everything Vlade did which is bringing in vets to try and make the 8th spot instead of staying the course and keep acquiring younger talent.
Im a bit worried.
Mirrors my major concern w/ the Houston guys—they don’t draft that well. Their models are great at identifying talent that’s already in the league, but seemingly nearly worthless at identifying prospects. Could be myriad reasons for that, but it’s quite the concern for this position.After reading the link, and see all the moves he was responsible or partly responsible for, honestly it looks like a bunch of shuffling deck chairs in a majority of deals and then there are the huge deals going after the superstars for the Houston roster.....and we will never ever be able to pull off one of those deals.
And then with analytics being his deal, maybe someone can point out where it actually helped them in bringing in young talent.
These deals and signings look just like everything Vlade did which is bringing in vets to try and make the 8th spot instead of staying the course and keep acquiring younger talent.
Im a bit worried.
Who really knows. Seems like a smart guy, that has worked his way up from the bottom, a lot of experience in a front office. Like them or hate them, the rockets have been a successful team for a long time. Nit picking the individual moves misses the point.After reading the link, and see all the moves he was responsible or partly responsible for, honestly it looks like a bunch of shuffling deck chairs in a majority of deals and then there are the huge deals going after the superstars for the Houston roster.....and we will never ever be able to pull off one of those deals.
And then with analytics being his deal, maybe someone can point out where it actually helped them in bringing in young talent.
These deals and signings look just like everything Vlade did which is bringing in vets to try and make the 8th spot instead of staying the course and keep acquiring younger talent.
Im a bit worried.
if this man got hired for his analytical prowess then I'm afraid the Kings are going to be in a similar situation as they were with Pete, maybe not as bad because McNair has more experience in the front office but still....the groundwork is not looking like something I can get excited about for the time being. Analytics should play a role in constructing a team but the main factor here is talent evaluation and having a plan and being consistent in striving towards it instead of being all over the place, which is what the Kings' identity has been for a long time.
I could be wrong here, but seems like they have generally had success identifying undrafted players over the years that have hit pretty good.Mirrors my major concern w/ the Houston guys—they don’t draft that well. Their models are great at identifying talent that’s already in the league, but seemingly nearly worthless at identifying prospects. Could be myriad reasons for that, but it’s quite the concern for this position.
Yup. The last thing we need is another Vlade/Williams situation.
Mirrors my major concern w/ the Houston guys—they don’t draft that well. Their models are great at identifying talent that’s already in the league, but seemingly nearly worthless at identifying prospects. Could be myriad reasons for that, but it’s quite the concern for this position.
Or, they don't draft at all. Their use of their first round picks around Harden has been to put current NBA talent around him while they have a title window open with Harden in his prime. That 2018 team easily could have been a title team had they not run into a historically great Warriors team.
And while the Westbrook trade reeks of ownership interference, their general plan has been the correct one. When you have a top 5 player on your team in his prime, the goal should be to up your championship odds and not wait for a rookie to develop. Unfortunately the Westbrook trade backfired pretty heavily and they're going to be hurting to try and improve their team going forward.