Not all that complimentary for $20-$25.
BTW, I think it is an elegant and beautiful picture. It is also a sensual pic. That is different than sexual. People who want to read sexual undertones, or lesbian undertones.....its in you're dirty little minds. You're looking at it that way. I''m referring to some comments in the article.
As to being demeaning, blah, blah, blah. I'm an ol'-time "feminist," and I get tired of the extremes. Yes, I don't like women portrayed as only worthwhile for their bodies. However, the Monarchs have been portrayed many times as great atheletes, strong and intelligent. Heck they were a a Wheaties box in their uniforms.
And its not like male atheletes don't appear in pictures designed mainly to show their physical attractiveness. Ticha, Yo and Nicole are more covered up in that picture than a huge number of women I see everyday out in public. I showed more than that in halter tops, minis and hot pants. (God I'm old!)
What bugs me is the idea that in order to not be "demeaned," some folks seem to think that you have to give up being a woman and showing that you are womanly and attractive. Good grief, that's just as bad as showing women as only sex objects. I'll be grateful for the day that women can be appreciated for their abilities, talents and brains, without having to pretend their not women.
(puts soapbox in the corner....
sorry )