Ric Bucher: Kings Put Squeeze on Spurs

CWebb's HOT!

Prospect
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime?page=dailydime-060501

Kings put squeeze on Spurs


By Ric Bucher, ESPN The Magazine


There's still a chance that Ron Artest will lose his mind or that Bonzi Wells will blow his cool. So, for now, let's not go overboard with the appearance that the Sacramento Kings have several matchups that pose serious problems for the San Antonio Spurs.



The matchup that isn't going to go away, though, is between coaches Rick Adelman and Gregg Popovich, with Adelman pinpointing every single San Antonio pressure point and squeezing it to death. On Sunday, the Kings showed the champs once again they aren't going to be a typical No. 8 seed with a 102-84 trouncing, paced by 25 points and 17 boards from Wells. With the series tied 2-2, Adelman and the Kings seem, against all odds, to have a handle on how to handle the Spurs.


In the process, Adelman also has put a viselike grip on Kings ownership, the Maloof family. One of the nuggets rattling around the rumor mill all season has been that Adelman is out, the reasons being his lack of assertiveness and defensive acuity and the general sense that the Kings' core had stopped listening to him.

Now, anything short of a lengthy renewal and a significant raise would seem out of order.

Whatever impression you may have of Adelman from his sour sideline demeanor, bland wardrobe or somewhat whiny voice, the man has always understood how to exploit his team's strengths and his opponent's weaknesses. Always. He also has never been afraid to do whatever is necessary, no matter whose feelings among his players it might hurt.
I was a beat writer covering Adelman with the Golden State Warriors, watching as he kept his team in contention for a playoff spot all season despite Tim Hardaway and Latrell Sprewell hating each other and Joe Smith as his best low-post presence. They didn't make it, but they never quit. Considering the meager talent and massive turmoil, it may have been as good as any coaching job he's done. In any case, what he's doing now to Popovich is no surprise.

For those not paying attention, what Adelman has pinpointed is that the Spurs don't have an easy answer for Artest and Wells attacking from the wings, and the solution to stopping the Spurs' balanced offense is to keep Tim Duncan guessing, make Tony Parker a playmaker and Manu Ginobili a catch-and-shoot player.


During and after the game, several TNT analysts -- Jalen Rose, Charles Barkley, Kenny Smith -- opined that the way to free Ginobili of Artest's shackles is to get him the ball in transition and coming off double screens. Well, sure, but that depends on the Kings missing shots and the Spurs rebounding well, which are not guarantees.

One rather drastic option is to replace Tony Parker with Ginobili at point guard. Parker, while continuing to score at a decent clip, isn't creating easy baskets for anybody else and isn't exactly shutting down Mike Bibby, who's averaging 19 points per game in the series. Putting Ginobili at the point and starting Brent Barry or Michael Finley at least creates a wrinkle for Adelman to iron out, specifically who Bibby guards and how to attack a bigger, longer opponent.

Take nothing away from what Parker has done this season; after all, he did play a huge part in the Spurs claiming the West's best record. But the playoffs require your key players to carry the load, to be better, to do what's necessary. Manu, time and again, has done that. He is San Antonio's energizer and X factor, and whatever other cliche you want to throw out there. I've said from the start, without him at 100 percent, it doesn't matter what Duncan or Parker or anybody else does, the Spurs don't defend their title.
Now, as it stands, they have some questions to answer to make it out of the first round. Questions posed by one Rick Adelman. Rarely has a lame duck looked so spry.
 
CWebb's HOT! said:
Whatever impression you may have of Adelman from his sour sideline demeanor, bland wardrobe or somewhat whiny voice, the man has always understood how to exploit his team's strengths and his opponent's weaknesses. Always. He also has never been afraid to do whatever is necessary, no matter whose feelings among his players it might hurt.

Whatever impression you may have of Bucher and his oversized head, Donald Trump hair and irritating presence on ESPN, this is a decent article.
 
Ok big head, how about taking a Kings stance and let us know what to do to beat the Spurs? Im tired of this guy offering ideas on how to beat the Kings. Fer crying out loud, aren't we the underdogs still???? Still sounding anti-King to me :\
 
CWebb's HOT! said:
was the first line really necessary?

Sure was. It got your attention, didn't it?

There's still a chance that Ron Artest will lose his mind or that Bonzi Wells will blow his cool. So, for now, let's not go overboard with the appearance that the Sacramento Kings have several matchups that pose serious problems for the San Antonio Spurs.

He's leading up to the second paragraph, the one that makes it clear that the matchup that is truly the one to be watching in this round one isn't the players. It's the coaches. Rick Adelman is creating total havoc for Gregg Popovich and the Spurs.

I generally do not like Ric Bucher but this article is well written, the lead sentence grabs your interest and he proceeds to put forth a pretty good testimonial to the true strengths and talents of one Rick Adelman.
 
PFFFT!! said:
Ok big head, how about taking a Kings stance and let us know what to do to beat the Spurs? Im tired of this guy offering ideas on how to beat the Kings. Fer crying out loud, aren't we the underdogs still???? Still sounding anti-King to me :\

Geez. Some of you are so quick to try and find something anti-Kings. It's NOT anti-Kings.

It's saying that it's the Spurs who are scrambling and trying to find a way to beat the Kings, the #8 seed, instead of the other way around... It's saying that Adelman is outcoaching Gregg Popovich. It's giving him props.

"Rarely has a lame duck looked so spry."

That's a compliment.
 
VF21 said:
Geez. Some of you are so quick to try and find something anti-Kings. It's NOT anti-Kings.

It's saying that it's the Spurs who are scrambling and trying to find a way to beat the Kings, the #8 seed, instead of the other way around... It's saying that Adelman is outcoaching Gregg Popovich. It's giving him props.

"Rarely has a lame duck looked so spry."

That's a compliment.

VF, exactly, the statement "Spurs finding a way to beat the Kings" when they are TIED 2-2. From this point forward its a new series, one that should be treated that way and given a point of view from BOTH teams. To say that the lowly kings are tied with the mighty spurs and that the Spurs SHOULD find a way to beat us...well...thats one point of view, how about the other? Like the Spurs, we have problems too, albeit not major, but problems that could creep up in game 5.
 
Whatever. We're the #8 seed. They're the reigning world champions. I have no problem whatsoever in that article. I honestly cannot see why you do.

Sometimes people only find offense if that's what they were looking for to begin with.
 
Well, Ric...I still can't like you. Especially when you talk.

He's right on some points, though. Adelman deserves these props, and now the pressures' on the Maloofs to make a fatty offer the day after the final horn sounds for this team, whenever that may be.

I would cringe if Manu started PG and Bibby had to guard him. Ron would probably just play point as well, and switch to Manu. I really don't think WE need to adjust to the Spurs, unless Pop does something drastic as Ric suggests here.
 
I'm sure that Rick appreciates Pucher "saluting him" with lines like these "Whatever impression you may have of Adelman from his sour sideline demeanor, bland wardrobe or somewhat whiny voice,".

With "friends" like Ric Bucher, who needs enemies? :rolleyes:
 
For Bucher, it's positively gushing ... you and I both know it's high praise indeed compared to some of the tripe Bucher has written about the Kings, with emphasis on Adelman (and Webber back in the day).

I know it must have pained him to actually have to give credit to Rick, so I can imagine he tried to temper it with as much vitriol as possible. All adjectives and modifying phrases aside, I think the actual gist of the article is pretty fair, especially for someone like our dear friend Mr. Bucher.
 
if pop started manu at the point with barry or finley at the 2, is bibby guarding them all that bad? so finley scores 20 instead of parker.... how many minutes will parker get? he is their starting point guard, he will get more minutes than finley and artest will still be on manu.....
 
AriesMar27 said:
if pop started manu at the point with barry or finley at the 2, is bibby guarding them all that bad? so finley scores 20 instead of parker.... how many minutes will parker get? he is their starting point guard, he will get more minutes than finley and artest will still be on manu.....

Well, that was an idiotic suggestion by Bucher, so I'm just assuming from the flavor here that Parker is yet another one of his whipping boys. He seems to pick them and strick with them so that they can do NO right. Think Barron was another one.
 
Bricklayer said:
I'm sure that Rick appreciates Pucher "saluting him" with lines like these "Whatever impression you may have of Adelman from his sour sideline demeanor, bland wardrobe or somewhat whiny voice,".

With "friends" like Ric Bucher, who needs enemies? :rolleyes:


i'll take Adelman's suits, over say Fratello's. He looked like a clown.
 
Do bucher and stein share notes when they write about the kings? Not to say that this particular article is king bashing but most of the time their articles are.
 
Back
Top