Perry's 2025 Draft
- Thread starter Spike
- Start date
Noble
Bench
AI Analysis of the picks:
NIQUE CLIFFORD
---
Raw Production (Per-Game)
18.9 PPG, 9.6 RPG, 4.4 APG in 35.4 MPG
That’s high-level productivity and workload for a college wing; double-digit boards from a 6′6″ player signals elite rebounding instincts—rare for an NBA 2/3.
1.2 SPG, 0.6 BPG
Shows active hands and secondary rim protection; combined with size and wingspan, he profiles as a multi-positional defender.
---
Shooting & Efficiency
49.6% FG (6.6/13.3), 37.7% 3PT (1.8/4.9), 77.7% FT (3.9/5.0)
Near-50% from the field and high-volume 3PA (4.9/gm) at 37.7% demonstrate confidence + legitimate NBA-range shooting.
FT% near 78% is a strong indicator of touch—typically translates well for wings.
71.1% at rim → Excellent finisher; shows athleticism and body control when attacking closeouts or in transition.
---
Advanced Metrics
10.3 BPM (Box Plus-Minus)
Elite: by comparison, most college stars project well to the NBA if they post 7–8 BPM; 10+ indicates massive on-court impact.
60.3 TS%
Above the typical ~56–58% average for college wings; efficient despite high usage.
+38.3 Net Rating Differential
His team was 38 points per 100 possessions better with him on the floor—absurdly strong indicator of two-way impact.
27.7% Usage
Shouldered a big offensive load—means he’s used to creating shots, though he’ll be off-ball more in the NBA.
---
Physical Profile
6′6″, 202 lbs, 6′8″ wingspan
Prototypical size for an NBA 2/3.
Big enough to absorb contact on drives, defend multiple positions, and rebound over guards/smaller wings.
---
Projected NBA Fit
Strengths:
Elite rebounding for a guard/wing—will generate extra possessions and finish defensive stops.
Spot-up shooting: 37.7% 3PT with solid volume suggests he can be a legitimate floor-spacer.
Switchable defense: active hands + strong physical tools.
Transition finisher: 71.1% at rim + vertical burst.
Concerns:
2.6 turnovers per game on 4.4 assists → turnover-prone if asked to create too much in NBA halfcourt sets.
Will need to adjust from primary option in college → low-usage role in NBA—scaling down can take time.
---
Kings Rotation Outlook
Profiles as an impact bench wing who can guard 2–4, space the floor, and energize second units with rebounding + defense.
Complements a defense-focused bench (Carter, Ellis) and provides size next to smaller guards.
Has upside to eventually push for starting minutes if he proves his 3PT shooting translates and defense holds up vs NBA athletes.
---
Bottom Line: Clifford’s combination of elite college production, advanced metrics, positional rebounding, and promising shooting makes him a high-upside, low-risk addition for the Kings’ rotation—exactly the kind of two-way wing every contender covets.
---
MAXIME RAYNAUD
Raw Production (Per-Game)
20.2 PPG, 10.6 RPG, 1.7 APG in ~33.5 MPG
Averaged a 20/10 double-double—elite productivity; only a handful of NCAA players reached those thresholds in 2024–25.
1.2 BPG + 0.9 SPG show activity as a secondary rim protector and ability to disrupt passing lanes.
---
Shooting & Efficiency
FG% ~47%, 3PT 34.4% on 5.5 3PA/game, FT 76%
High-volume 3-point shooting for a 7-footer; 5+ 3PA/g signals confidence and legitimate perimeter gravity.
Solid free-throw stroke (76%) supports belief in NBA 3-point translation.
At-rim finishing ~60% (around average for college bigs), but shot distribution shows willingness to step outside: ~36% of FGA were 3s.
---
Advanced Metrics
BPM ~9.0–10.0 → Indicates high two-way on-court impact at college level.
TS% ~56.3% → Solid overall efficiency considering high usage (~31.5% USG).
Net Rating Differential +10 → Team 10 points per 100 better with him on the floor; suggests positive impact even with high usage.
Rebound Rate ~32% TRB% → Dominant on the boards, especially for second-chance opportunities.
---
Physical Profile
Height: 7’1″
Weight: ~237 lbs
Wingspan: 7’1″
Age/DOB: 6/21/03 (22 years old entering NBA rookie season)
---
Projected NBA Fit
Strengths:
Legit stretch-5: 34%+ 3PT on 5+ attempts per game is rare at his size; could immediately add spacing to Kings’ bench or let Sabonis slide to 4 in jumbo lineups.
Rebounding: Excellent on both ends; proactive boxing out and timing.
Offensive diversity: Can face up, pick-and-pop, or seal deep for simple post scores.
Concerns:
Lateral mobility: Below NBA average; likely gets targeted in switches or PnR against quicker guards.
Rim protection ceiling: Blocks shots by size but not elite leaper; projects more as deterrent than dynamic shot-blocker.
Defensive versatility: Projects as drop-only big; struggles outside the paint could limit matchup viability.
---
Kings Rotation Outlook
Ideal backup stretch 5 who complements Sabonis by offering floor spacing and rebounding.
If paired with a mobile 4 (e.g., Murray or Clifford), can hide some defensive deficiencies.
Potential second-unit anchor offensively: lets bench lineups run PnR with Monk/Carter + Raynaud for pop spacing.
Realistic path to playing time since neither Sabonis nor JV stretches the floor—gives Kings a look they don’t currently have.
---
Bottom Line: Raynaud’s unique combination of volume 3-point shooting, rebounding dominance, and efficient scoring at 7’1″ makes him a rare second-round value. He’s an immediate fit as a floor-spacing bench center with the upside to close games situationally if he can prove passable in pick-and-roll defense.
NIQUE CLIFFORD
---
Raw Production (Per-Game)18.9 PPG, 9.6 RPG, 4.4 APG in 35.4 MPG
That’s high-level productivity and workload for a college wing; double-digit boards from a 6′6″ player signals elite rebounding instincts—rare for an NBA 2/3.
1.2 SPG, 0.6 BPG
Shows active hands and secondary rim protection; combined with size and wingspan, he profiles as a multi-positional defender.
---
Shooting & Efficiency49.6% FG (6.6/13.3), 37.7% 3PT (1.8/4.9), 77.7% FT (3.9/5.0)
Near-50% from the field and high-volume 3PA (4.9/gm) at 37.7% demonstrate confidence + legitimate NBA-range shooting.
FT% near 78% is a strong indicator of touch—typically translates well for wings.
71.1% at rim → Excellent finisher; shows athleticism and body control when attacking closeouts or in transition.
---
Advanced Metrics10.3 BPM (Box Plus-Minus)
Elite: by comparison, most college stars project well to the NBA if they post 7–8 BPM; 10+ indicates massive on-court impact.
60.3 TS%
Above the typical ~56–58% average for college wings; efficient despite high usage.
+38.3 Net Rating Differential
His team was 38 points per 100 possessions better with him on the floor—absurdly strong indicator of two-way impact.
27.7% Usage
Shouldered a big offensive load—means he’s used to creating shots, though he’ll be off-ball more in the NBA.
---
Physical Profile6′6″, 202 lbs, 6′8″ wingspan
Prototypical size for an NBA 2/3.
Big enough to absorb contact on drives, defend multiple positions, and rebound over guards/smaller wings.
---
Projected NBA Fit Strengths:Elite rebounding for a guard/wing—will generate extra possessions and finish defensive stops.
Spot-up shooting: 37.7% 3PT with solid volume suggests he can be a legitimate floor-spacer.
Switchable defense: active hands + strong physical tools.
Transition finisher: 71.1% at rim + vertical burst.
Concerns:2.6 turnovers per game on 4.4 assists → turnover-prone if asked to create too much in NBA halfcourt sets.
Will need to adjust from primary option in college → low-usage role in NBA—scaling down can take time.
---
Kings Rotation OutlookProfiles as an impact bench wing who can guard 2–4, space the floor, and energize second units with rebounding + defense.
Complements a defense-focused bench (Carter, Ellis) and provides size next to smaller guards.
Has upside to eventually push for starting minutes if he proves his 3PT shooting translates and defense holds up vs NBA athletes.
---
Bottom Line: Clifford’s combination of elite college production, advanced metrics, positional rebounding, and promising shooting makes him a high-upside, low-risk addition for the Kings’ rotation—exactly the kind of two-way wing every contender covets.
---
MAXIME RAYNAUD
Raw Production (Per-Game)20.2 PPG, 10.6 RPG, 1.7 APG in ~33.5 MPG
Averaged a 20/10 double-double—elite productivity; only a handful of NCAA players reached those thresholds in 2024–25.
1.2 BPG + 0.9 SPG show activity as a secondary rim protector and ability to disrupt passing lanes.
---
Shooting & EfficiencyFG% ~47%, 3PT 34.4% on 5.5 3PA/game, FT 76%
High-volume 3-point shooting for a 7-footer; 5+ 3PA/g signals confidence and legitimate perimeter gravity.
Solid free-throw stroke (76%) supports belief in NBA 3-point translation.
At-rim finishing ~60% (around average for college bigs), but shot distribution shows willingness to step outside: ~36% of FGA were 3s.
---
Advanced MetricsBPM ~9.0–10.0 → Indicates high two-way on-court impact at college level.
TS% ~56.3% → Solid overall efficiency considering high usage (~31.5% USG).
Net Rating Differential +10 → Team 10 points per 100 better with him on the floor; suggests positive impact even with high usage.
Rebound Rate ~32% TRB% → Dominant on the boards, especially for second-chance opportunities.
---
Physical ProfileHeight: 7’1″
Weight: ~237 lbs
Wingspan: 7’1″
Age/DOB: 6/21/03 (22 years old entering NBA rookie season)
---
Projected NBA Fit Strengths:Legit stretch-5: 34%+ 3PT on 5+ attempts per game is rare at his size; could immediately add spacing to Kings’ bench or let Sabonis slide to 4 in jumbo lineups.
Rebounding: Excellent on both ends; proactive boxing out and timing.
Offensive diversity: Can face up, pick-and-pop, or seal deep for simple post scores.
Concerns:Lateral mobility: Below NBA average; likely gets targeted in switches or PnR against quicker guards.
Rim protection ceiling: Blocks shots by size but not elite leaper; projects more as deterrent than dynamic shot-blocker.
Defensive versatility: Projects as drop-only big; struggles outside the paint could limit matchup viability.
---
Kings Rotation OutlookIdeal backup stretch 5 who complements Sabonis by offering floor spacing and rebounding.
If paired with a mobile 4 (e.g., Murray or Clifford), can hide some defensive deficiencies.
Potential second-unit anchor offensively: lets bench lineups run PnR with Monk/Carter + Raynaud for pop spacing.
Realistic path to playing time since neither Sabonis nor JV stretches the floor—gives Kings a look they don’t currently have.
---
Bottom Line: Raynaud’s unique combination of volume 3-point shooting, rebounding dominance, and efficient scoring at 7’1″ makes him a rare second-round value. He’s an immediate fit as a floor-spacing bench center with the upside to close games situationally if he can prove passable in pick-and-roll defense.
Damned purple glasses!
We certainly didn't get the nicest silk purse in this draft. But even if we end up with the 10th-nicest silk purse in this draft, that sow's ear was a pretty poor starting point and Perry deserves credit.
ockingsfan
Starter
Given that Perry entered the night with only one mid- 2nd round pick (Thanks for nothing Monte!), I think Perry made out like a bandit. We ended the night with two 1st round talent level players to add to our rotation.
All he had to give to get into the 1st round was a comparable mid to late 1st or 2 2nds in 2027. That's something we never saw Monte do. So we can see Perry values the draft which is so important for the GM of small market teams like the Kings. I'm liking what I am seeing so far.
Now, lets make some smart moves during free agency and the King may have a shot at making the playoffs.
All he had to give to get into the 1st round was a comparable mid to late 1st or 2 2nds in 2027. That's something we never saw Monte do. So we can see Perry values the draft which is so important for the GM of small market teams like the Kings. I'm liking what I am seeing so far.
Now, lets make some smart moves during free agency and the King may have a shot at making the playoffs.
Tetsujin
The Game Thread Dude
It does feel like Scott is approaching things like the GM of a small market team should (one pick for immediate depth and one pick that is an upside swing but not in a damagingly embarrassing way like the Papagiannis pick was).
Also he said he wanted tough, high effort grinders and he got those through the draft and UDFA (except maybe for Maxime who isn’t quite the sort of guy Scott was looking for but it won’t matter if he hits)
QWERTYLICIOUS
Starter
Was Papagiannis really an "upside swing" pick, though? I vaguely recall Vlade talking the dude up to be the real thing and how he would be making an immediate impact.
BenchMob
Bench
My ears perked how he responded on the Demar situation. Sure sounded like he is sticking around but it could be GM speak
I give a B. But really an incomplete because he did a lot with very little and so you could make the case for an A if you grade on a curve or low expectations. These guys will have to get minutes and I think Perry has to clear out some vets in order for that to happen.
sono
Starter
Taking advantage of Thunder's tight situation and flipping the uncertain 2027 pick into almost two 1st rounders, emphasizing the need for size and defense.
The Kings have usually been on the wrong side of the deal in the past, not this time.
The rookies might not pan out as expected, but I like Perry's vision so far.
The Kings have usually been on the wrong side of the deal in the past, not this time.
The rookies might not pan out as expected, but I like Perry's vision so far.
Kingz19
Hall of Famer
I’ll go B
I did want them to get Rasheer Fleming if they were trading up. He seemed like a natural fit with Domas. I’m actually shocked that a player with his length and shooting ability fell to the second. I guess he didn’t have impressive work outs.
I do like Clifford though and think he’ll be a dude and quickly.
I really like the Raynaud pick at 42. That’s a steal. What he did offensively at a high level in college is matched by few and they were mostly all studs in the NBA.
I did want them to get Rasheer Fleming if they were trading up. He seemed like a natural fit with Domas. I’m actually shocked that a player with his length and shooting ability fell to the second. I guess he didn’t have impressive work outs.
I do like Clifford though and think he’ll be a dude and quickly.
I really like the Raynaud pick at 42. That’s a steal. What he did offensively at a high level in college is matched by few and they were mostly all studs in the NBA.
gunks
Hall of Famer
B.
I think there's a good chance at least one of the players he picked ends up a rotation guy, and honestly you couldn't ask for much more than that considering he went into the draft without a 1st rounder.
I definitely dig the skill sets of each prospect, seems like the theme is defense and rebounding.
I think there's a good chance at least one of the players he picked ends up a rotation guy, and honestly you couldn't ask for much more than that considering he went into the draft without a 1st rounder.
I definitely dig the skill sets of each prospect, seems like the theme is defense and rebounding.
LT-Sac-Town
G-League
It's an easy A for me. This draft was going to play a big part in my interest level for next season and I'm fired up haha. We saw a lot of good and different things than previous drafts.
Positives
-Being aggressive in a trade up into the 1st round, but not sacrificing anything of great value
-BPA and needs going together - 1 wing, 1 stretch big man
-Walking away with two clear 1st round talents
- Valuing our 2nd round pick, always a lot of conspiracy of what happens with these picks, but nice to see us stand firm and draft a 1st round talent that slipped
Negatives
- I truly can't think of one, maybe not getting a stretch #4 with day one starting potential, but that's a lot to ask given our position heading into the draft
Overall, we got a ton of value + talent from a draft in which we started with only the #42 overall pick and the only asset we lost is a top 16 protected 1st round pick from SA. Plus, with the protections it will at least give us something fun to root for in the 26-27 season, but we all know that pick will most likely be later than #24.
Well done Mr. Perry - onto free agency
Positives
-Being aggressive in a trade up into the 1st round, but not sacrificing anything of great value
-BPA and needs going together - 1 wing, 1 stretch big man
-Walking away with two clear 1st round talents
- Valuing our 2nd round pick, always a lot of conspiracy of what happens with these picks, but nice to see us stand firm and draft a 1st round talent that slipped
Negatives
- I truly can't think of one, maybe not getting a stretch #4 with day one starting potential, but that's a lot to ask given our position heading into the draft
Overall, we got a ton of value + talent from a draft in which we started with only the #42 overall pick and the only asset we lost is a top 16 protected 1st round pick from SA. Plus, with the protections it will at least give us something fun to root for in the 26-27 season, but we all know that pick will most likely be later than #24.
Well done Mr. Perry - onto free agency
