Now that I think about it...

[BMiller52]

The John Salmons signing wasn't bad. I actually liked him as a player and even though we might have overpaid I like the signing.

The thing that pisses me off is we're letting Bonzi go for nothing. It's just bleeding talent. You're talking about losing a starter, a good defender, a great post player, your 2nd best rebounder, and someone who Ron wanted back. That's a lot to lose just because you're getting scared of the luxury tax. Now I'd be fine if we found a player we could use that blocks shots and did a sign and trade but losing him for nothing is inexcusable IMO.

Do you guys agree with me(that the Salmons signing wasn't bad, but letting Bonzi go for nothing is awful)?

 

[BigWaxer]

So we need a new thread for every single Salmons thought. Sorry mods, I am having a hard time trying to keep up on posts... people open a new thread because they think their thought is better then the rest.

 

[HighFlyingMonkey]

Oh yeah definitely, it's the Kings' fault that Bonzi wants more than he's worth.

I'd rather let him go than to pay him to a Mega deal and watch him get complacent.

 

[Kings113]

#2.

 

[VF21]

This is being discussed so thoroughly in other threads that I simply think it's best to put a stop to everyone wanting to start a new thread for the same stuff.