New Assistant GM of Stockton Kings!
- Thread starter The_Jamal
- Start date
Apparently, your opinion is not viewed as inflammatory on this board and that's why it's "allowed" by the powers that be. So one opinion on the subject matter of social responsibility is allowed, whereas a "diverse" opinion is not allowed. Sounds like a double standard to me. Maybe gross hypocrisy also.
Consistent with what? I didn't delete anything: all I said was that the topic of this thread is Anjali Ranadivé being hired as assistant GM of the Stockton Kings, not James Ham, so keep the thread to discussing that. What does "social justice" have to do with it, and what "opinion" do you think is not being allowed? Because the only two posts I see deleted in this thread are mocking the use of the term "social responsibility," which I do not believe is a synonym for "social justice": neither one of those posts appear to be offering an actual opinion about anything, unless you think that making fun of the term "social responsibility" is an opinion, in and of itself.
Most of the posts in this thread have been critical of the hire, and have not been deleted or edited (none of the posts that have been edited were edited by a moderator, only by the posters themselves). We even left in the one objectifying her. What sort of opinion, exactly, do you think isn't being allowed? And I'd take it as a kindness if you would show your work.
Most of the posts in this thread have been critical of the hire, and have not been deleted or edited (none of the posts that have been edited were edited by a moderator, only by the posters themselves). We even left in the one objectifying her. What sort of opinion, exactly, do you think isn't being allowed? And I'd take it as a kindness if you would show your work.
