Which is the home team?
I can't tell because they're both wearing road uniforms.
In the playoffs
I like it. I hate the white uniforms anyway. Did you know the only reason they have white uniforms is because back in the very old days of black and white TV, it was hard to differentiate between the teams? Since that's no longer a problem it doesn't matter as much.![]()
Bush league. It's like little league that if both teams wore similar shades than one would put on some crappy orange over shirt.
Home white. Road color. Tradition. No matter the origins.
These aren't even their main roadies...which tells me it's a cash crab to get people to buy tacky alternates while making it look like a preseason game at the Thomas and Mack center. Like the teams that don't expect to advance want to pimp out their special editions while they got face time.
Like I said.. atleast the road team hasn't worn home white yet but I hope this is just to add some flare to the typically boring first round and we'll start taking this seriously by round 2
Dude, it's not a big deal
We differ on that
Boy! The Kings are back in the playoffs on their home floor...
![]()
Nice straw man.
Tradition blows. "That's the way we've always done it" is not a good enough reason to do something.
"Change for the sake of change" is an assertion that one cannot corroborate, and is likely informed by one's bias in favor of keeping things at the status quo. And, anyway, if the reason for doing something in a particular way is no longer required or valid, then ceasing to continue doing it that way does not rise to any reasonable definition of "for change's sake."
"Tried and true" is a crutch, and "that's the way we've always done it" is most often used to justify doing something stupid. Like wearing white jerseys at "home."
...How does tradition become tradition? From being tried and true in most cases. Change is necessary only when certain tradition becomes incompatible. There will always be tradition though. Not seeing that here and they aren't really making a good case for bucking tradition in this case...
Jazz and Clippers get it. Their games have had the most intensity as well. Probably unrelated though.
I don't really know how important it is that the Clippers don't have Griffin. Dude is such a flake in the 4th quarter it boggles my mind how there has never been a media narrative installed about his uselessness in crunch time. Certainly not a Gobert level loss...as in, I think the Clippers have as good a chance of winning as i did before Griffin stubbed his toe.
I'm not mocking his injury though. If it's anything like the toe bruise I got hiking in desolation wilderness. He isn't playing his usual 3 quarters of basketball
I still hate them. I will also point out the removing a major player from a team that almost seems to pride itself on not quite being good enough, is of course of little consequence. The only question with Clips is which round they fail to measure up in. I am guessing this year the answer is round one.In all honesty, I find the Clippers ALMOST watchable without Griffin on the court. And I agree. I don 't think his absence is going to be the bellwether in determining the eventual winner.
I'm much more annoyed by the fact that Thunder/Rockets is not fun basketball, than I am by what color jerseys they're wearing. But, maybe that's just me.i don't like it and won't. Again, pet peeve. I was half making lighthearted "you know what grinds my gears?" posts. Multiple times because I think the Rockets and Thunder have done it every game. My response to VF and the other guy were meant to be funny..I thought the gold standard Kings alternate reference would be a giveaway but then I was called out for building a straw man...and if something grinds my gears as much as home teams wearing their least identifiable road rags as home uniforms on the biggest stage..its being told I'm taking something too seriously by others who are taking it too seriously.