I can't figure out if it was the Pacers' lack of experience that cost them the game, or if it was the Celtics' experience that won them the game. Or was it truly a combination of both at the end of the day...
Also, as easy as it is to dog on Indiana for the few bonehead plays they made down the stretch with the basketball in both the 4th quarter and in overtime, let's not discredit the defense played by the Celtics.
That was a fun game 1 to watch. Let's see how Indiana responds in game 2.