You think if that was something I was ok with sharing that I would have worded the post the way I did? C'mon.
There's no magic to talent evaluation. People act like its some amazing thing you have to be trained in. Hardly. Idiotic decisions are made all the time by people trained in it. Untrained guys fresh off the boat can step in and do a bang up job at others. If Vlade was a career file clerk in a small dusty library in Trieste that would be one thing. But he's not. He's a basketball lifer. His big break from basketball was when he took over the entire Olympic sports federation for Serbia. He's either going to have the knack and be able to spot guys with talent, or he's not. But its got little to do with being in some organization over time.
Meanwhile most teams hire a capologist to do the cap work, and that's not magic either. The NBA is not rocket science. The Kings could probably hire Capt. Fact. and do just fine. All you need to know is the publicly available CBA and have a head for numbers. The rest is just management tactics.
The sum total of what Vlade has to learn is how to manage a front office. He doesn't have to learn how to talent evaluate. You either can or can't. he doesn't have to learn how to cap manipulate. You hire (hopefully less slimy) gerbils for that work. He just has to learn how to manage a team of scouts, when to schedule meetings, who his equivalents are around the league and all the other "manager" parts of general managing. And frankly there he may end up hiring an underling to handle that stuff (think we still have Bratz around with experience too, Karl has long been an imperial coach with half a foot in GMing etc.).
Not if you want to see what you have. Not if things were not 100% to change, meaning to see what was salvageable and what was not. You'd just have a new captain on a ship on fire.
I think it's a fair question...and a fair answer.
We're all just screen names here. If someone claims to have a source or some kind of insider knowledge, there's no way to know if they're telling the truth or (as has happened in the past) they're just blowing smoke for whatever reason. That's why you often see people demanding to know who the source is so they can decide whether or not to believe the information.
But ... that's the tricky thing about sources - they say things privately because, for the most part, they cannot say them publicly without risking their jobs, or whatever it is that gives them access to certain information. Sometimes, as much as we would like to share something, it's better off to say nothing because there's no way you can prove your information is solid without revealing too much about whomever you heard it from.
Yes, there's no magic involved to talent evaluation - Merlin need not apply. No, being a basketball lifer does not confer a good ability to evaluate talent. Talent evaluation is like any other talent: There are some people much more gifted at it than others. Yes, Vlade is going to have the knack or not to evaluate talent; that ability may not be magical, but it is real. Does he have the knack? We don't know, do we. But the fact that he is reportedly looking for an excellent talent evaluator with the track record to back it up implies that he's not confident in his ability to take on that role. Let's not make this mistake: Just because everybody thinks that he or she is an excellent talent evaluator, doesn't mean that everybody actually is.
And how would you describe Pete's talent as a GM?
Let's just put it this way, I have been posting here for well over a decade. I have never made any strong claims about anything like this before, I am just saying that J. Jones information is correct.
TERRIBLE.
Also, I find it interesting that Vivek talks in this general fashion about the cronyism in the NBA, as if every organization has it, as if his organization is part of this general phenomena rather than the exception. This is a CYA self aggrandizing comment as far as I am concerned. He hired a suck-up who of course wants others to suck-up to him. Malone and Shareef didn't; they are gone because they didn't want to suck up. Vivek is ultimately responsible for his suck-up hire, as he is ultimately responsible for every hire in his org.
Yes, there's no magic involved to talent evaluation - Merlin need not apply. No, being a basketball lifer does not confer a good ability to evaluate talent. Talent evaluation is like any other talent: There are some people much more gifted at it than others. Yes, Vlade is going to have the knack or not to evaluate talent; that ability may not be magical, but it is real. Does he have the knack? We don't know, do we. But the fact that he is reportedly looking for an excellent talent evaluator with the track record to back it up implies that he's not confident in his ability to take on that role. Let's not make this mistake: Just because everybody thinks that he or she is an excellent talent evaluator, doesn't mean that everybody actually is.
Okay, 2 decades in the past, but I did have some minor visibility into goings-on at Jazz HQ near the end of the Stockton-Malone era. So 1) merely a data point and 2) an old data point, but Vivek's comment maps to what I saw there. And the Jazz were considered to be a pretty well-run organization at the time by NBA standards.
Nepotism and good-old-boys clubs are tough to break up in large organizations, especially when they have the goodwill of deep-pocketed owners. They are nearly impossible to break up in small organizations. The NBA is a small organization that commands a tremendous amount of wealth and prestige with no external competition. The is a pretty decent breeding ground for "cronyism" to develop and a difficult place to root it out.
Consider the Vlade hiring (to which I am agnostic.) What exactly are his qualifications for the job? Well, he used to be a veteran floor-leader for the golden-age team. And? What company in a competitive industry would hire its former star salesperson to serve as CEO during a restructuring?
Hiring Vlade is cronyism - giving the nod to a popular insider to do a job for which he has exhibited next to no qualification and has no experience at. The only immediate benefit you gain is a slight boost to public goodwill, but you are taking a huge risk that he will be unable to navigate the gauntlet of overachievers of players, agents, coaches, many of whom are probably eyeing your job at some point in the future.
So, you were right, Vivek. There is certainly cronyism in the league, and you are perpetuating it.
So, you were right, Vivek. There is certainly cronyism in the league, and you are perpetuating it.
ok if things were going sour with Pete, how should Vivek handle that from this moment on?
i love that Pete is taking shots at Vlade on the way out (with help from Woj and even Ziller). Nothing will galvanize the King fan community like personal attacks on a true blue King #21.
I'm happy to be a Kings fan right now. Better times ahead.
He refers to Vlade as a guy who has t been around he NBA for 10 years.I read the Ziller piece as taking shots at Vivek, not Vlade, and it certainly isn't as pro PDA as Woj's. But who knows.
There's no magic to talent evaluation. He's either going to have the knack and be able to spot guys with talent, or he's not. But its got little to do with being in some organization over time.
Ham's bombshell Cowbell Kingdom podcast said this was going to happen.Woj needs to let this go. Has some defenders over at other forums right now, with Woj's reputation being the backing point.
Word of warning to BS promoters, our fan base is unique, we will find out, it will come out.
For me, while it would be nice to know the source, I would much rather hear the unsourced information, and then decide for myself whether it sounds plausible, then to not hear it solely to protect the source.But ... that's the tricky thing about sources - they say things privately because, for the most part, they cannot say them publicly without risking their jobs, or whatever it is that gives them access to certain information. Sometimes, as much as we would like to share something, it's better off to say nothing because there's no way you can prove your information is solid without revealing too much about whomever you heard it from.
The rumor is that they offered the head coach job to Gentry during the interview for an assistant spot, and he declined.I always suspected he wanted to bring Gentry to the Kings, but that was just a gut feeling. The people wh really know what the plan was on the "Night of the Gerbil" are not likely to ever spill the beans on that FUBAR situation.
Strong words from Woj. Herein lies the problem again. Jones sources say PDA and Mullin were the evil-doers. Woj's sources say Vivek was/is the evil-doer. Who's right? I'm more inclined to go with Woj, because it's Woj, but still.
Yes, there's no magic involved to talent evaluation - Merlin need not apply. No, being a basketball lifer does not confer a good ability to evaluate talent. Talent evaluation is like any other talent: There are some people much more gifted at it than others. Yes, Vlade is going to have the knack or not to evaluate talent; that ability may not be magical, but it is real. Does he have the knack? We don't know, do we. But the fact that he is reportedly looking for an excellent talent evaluator with the track record to back it up implies that he's not confident in his ability to take on that role. Let's not make this mistake: Just because everybody thinks that he or she is an excellent talent evaluator, doesn't mean that everybody actually is.
This is true but there apparently ways to manipulate the cap, like PDA apparently did by signing guys to contracts that are partially guaranteed into a portion of next season that enables them to be moved as cap pieces and then promptly waived by the receiving team with next to zero penalty. That's assuming that actually happens. While not "genius" there will always be subtle ways to bend the intended rules until they are caught and fixed and so finding a creative person in that regard is a positive. However when that person is terrible at personnel decisions and has the keys to the kingdom, the results are going to be a nightmare.I always thought "capologist" was one of the more baffling qualifications listed for a good GM. The CBA is somewhat complex, sure, but nearly infinitely less so than corporate tax structuring regulations. An accountant or tax lawyer worth his salt could do salary cap calculations for stress relief - kind of like a Sunday morning Sudoku.
Looking back at this saga, I just really wonder what their end game was. Did they think that a certain style could outweigh talent and coaching?
Yeah I was in the same "no animosity, just wanted someone more capable in charge" camp earlier today, but watching that Malone press conference again changed my mind. Malone went into this with every intention of forging a cooperative relationship with Pete and Vivek. He got along like gangbusters with our franchise player and had the team playing winning ball for the first time in nearly a decade. He surpassed expectations on almost every level and got fired anyway by a duplicitous two-faced backstabber who had the audacity to hide behind his owner when fingers started to get pointed. He's nowhere near Maloof level in my mind, as in I wouldn't feel the overwhelming urge to punch him in the face if I happened to see him walking down the street, but he's a black eye on the franchise and I hope there's a measure of karmic comeuppance in his future or at least a whole lot of self-reflection. He owes Mike Malone an apology if nothing else, and probably Vivek, Shareef, Tyrone Corbin, and this whole group of Kings players. And anyone who paid for a ticket this season.
It's unclear if we'll play hard again, we pissed off our franchise player, and our cantankerous coach that's going to get into dust up with DMC would rather stake out the high ground in their relationship for months by making DMC reach out to him to clear the air between them. I'm sure DMC appreciates that loyalty.
He kinda became the anti-Midas and everything he touched turned to crap. .