Because we don't need to memorize the keyboard shortcut for an umlaut.Why would we trade for Morant? We have Schroder.
If you get a Mac, you can just hold down the 'o' key while typing and the accenture options automatically pop up. Just saying.Because we don't need to memorize the keyboard shortcut for an umlaut.
I do opt-u then ‘o’ (actually back at my keyboard and confirmed now). Easy on a Mac for sure.If you get a Mac, you can just hold down the 'o' key while typing and the accenture options automatically pop up. Just saying.
Why was our trade suggestion two starter level players and two first round picks while the Clippers one is John Collins, a dude who isn’t even playing anymore, and one pick?
Are you of the opinion that Jaren Jackson Jr is worth 6 1st round picks and 3 1st round pick swaps?I suppose the Grizzlies might be willing to trade Jackson, Jr. to the Kings if you're willing to give up, like, all of your FRPs for the foreseeable future... Are you of the opinion that Jackson, Jr. is worth that much?
He gets injured all the time, has off the court problems, is trending way down on shots at the rim and is an inconsistent shooter.
He gets injured all the time, has off the court problems, is trending way down on shots at the rim and is an inconsistent shooter.
My opinion is that Jaren Jackson, Jr. is worth more than whatever the Sacramento Kings will offer for him.Are you of the opinion that Jaren Jackson Jr is worth 6 1st round picks and 3 1st round pick swaps?
That’s neat…My opinion is that Jaren Jackson, Jr. is worth more than whatever the Sacramento Kings will offer for him.
Don't eliminate the context: I said that in response to your seeming incredulity that I don't think that the Kings have the personnel to make an offer to the Grizzlies for Jaren Jackson, Jr. Based on the personnel the Kings have, I think that it would take the Kings all of their picks to get Jackson, Jr., because I don't think that there's any combination of players that Memphis would accept in exchange. So, as far as I'm concerned, whether I think that he's worth that much is irrelevant, because that what I think it would take for the Kings to get him.That’s neat…
You said the Grizzlies “might” be willing to trade Jackson if the Kings are willing to give up “all” of their first round picks for the “foreseeable future.”
Well…they have 6 1st round picks and 3 1st round pick swaps in their foreseeable future. Translation…you think the Grizzlies might be willing to trade JJJ for 6 1sts and 3 pick swaps. And the key word there is “might” which insinuates that you think that offer might not even be enough for Memphis to pull the trigger.
So I’ll ask again…are you really of the opinion that Jaren Jackson Jr is worth 6 1st round picks and 3 1st round pick swaps?
5. 1, 2, and 3
Ja would last like a week in Atlanta before he got suspended for a year for flashing a piece in a strip club or something lol
Got it. So you do think it would take 6 1sts and 3 pick swaps to get JJJ. That’s certainly a take to have.Don't eliminate the context: I said that in response to your seeming incredulity that I don't think that the Kings have the personnel to make an offer to the Grizzlies for Jaren Jackson, Jr. Based on the personnel the Kings have, I think that it would take the Kings all of their picks to get Jackson, Jr., because I don't think that there's any combination of players that Memphis would accept in exchange. So, as far as I'm concerned, whether I think that he's worth that much is irrelevant, because that what I think it would take for the Kings to get him.
Because maybe Ja is becoming a net negative when everything is taken into consideration.How do we justify asking for Wells while not giving up a prospect
If Orlando keeps this up we need to keep every assets we have for a Paolo move in the offseason not wasting it on this clown
If Orlando is looking to move Banchero because they can't build a winning team around him, what makes you think we will fare any better?
Because maybe Ja is becoming a net negative when everything is taken into consideration.
Taking chances beats looking for a franchise guy with the 11th pick
Doesn’t mean they’ll attach a good prospect to get rid of him they’ll be teams that would make an offer without wells getting included. Miami didn’t give up a single prospect trading butler and he was holding out with only one team willing to trade for him
I think you’ve got it backwards. Ja Morant may be the flashier player, and his highlights might outshine Fox’s efficiency, but De’Aaron Fox is the steadier, more complete, and more sustainable choice, the kind of player you can actually build a winning culture around. His handle, mid-range, and floater game have all matured. He’s no longer just fast, he’s calculated. And unlike Ja, he competes on both ends of the floor.At one point Ja Morant was supposedly the player that De'Aaron Fox thinks he is...
I think you’ve got it backwards. Ja Morant may be the flashier player, and his highlights might outshine Fox’s efficiency, but De’Aaron Fox is the steadier, more complete, and more sustainable choice, the kind of player you can actually build a winning culture around. His handle, mid-range, and floater game have all matured. He’s no longer just fast, he’s calculated. And unlike Ja, he competes on both ends of the floor.
Not sure when Fox supposedly thinks he’s the worse player who just gets overhyped for being flashy.
He's younger, I'll give you that.