Marty Mac: Lots of arena talk, no action

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#1
http://www.sacbee.com/content/sports/story/14279110p-15087840c.html

Marty Mac's World: Lots of arena talk comes with no action
By Martin McNeal -- Bee Sports Columnist
Published 12:01 am PDT Tuesday, July 18, 2006


All this talk about financing and building a new arena would be sickening if anything other than natural causes made me ill.

So much talk, posturing and propositions without any follow-through.

On one side are groups of local leaders allegedly representing the citizenry in clandestine meetings with whomever is representing the Maloof ownership.

It's groups -- plural -- because local leadership, as in a wrestling match, has people tagging in and out every few months. One day, Mayor Heather Fargo is leading the charge. The next, she's nowhere near the discussions. There has been a sheriff (Lou Blanas) and a billionaire (Angelo Tsakopoulos) attempting to work out something, ideally for the common good, but maybe that's a bit too high an aspiration.

Now another group of politicians has tagged in, and one hopes these people at least get enough data on the PowerPoint hookup to get something on the November ballot so voters can weigh in.

Then there is this ownership group, which clearly does need to build a new arena.

The Kings do need a new arena, in the opinion of someone who has spent quite a bit of time in every NBA arena the past 20 years. Arco Arena, hastily thrown together after the previous makeshift arena was constructed in the same manner, has outlived its usefulness.

Ownership appears unwilling to say how much cash it will commit to a new arena. I've heard the Maloofs will pay off the debt on the outstanding loan on the old arena, and isn't that nice? The Maloofs are not dumb, and maybe they just are waiting for their advisers to tell them the optimal time to divulge how much they'll ante up. Maybe they don't plan to contribute.

However, one of the first impressions I had of Sacramentans when visiting here a year before the Kings moved in was that this area was filled with folks who were averse to change. That impression has not changed, no matter how much the landscape has.

Here's one piece of advice, though: If a proposal to fund an arena is put on the ballot, make sure plans for the arena are filled with foresight. It's better to have something futuristic, perhaps more expensive than some wish, than to go on the cheap and end up here again 20 years from now.

OK, two pieces of advice: Before it's over, open up Arco to whoever wants to come, bring the Maloofs and their representatives and the city's leaders together in front of the taxpayers, and let's have a meeting in front of the world.

About the writer: The Bee's Martin McNeal can be reached at mmcneal@sacbee.com.
 
#2
OK, two pieces of advice: Before it's over, open up Arco to whoever wants to come, bring the Maloofs and their representatives and the city's leaders together in front of the taxpayers, and let's have a meeting in front of the world.
This is the kind of things that need to happen...but when and where does it start? The parties involved are running out of time, even if they get this thing on the ballot. Its too damn quiet...scary in fact.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#3
I'm sorry but I disagree. The Maloofs do NOT need to be out front on this. In fact, I think it might be the worst possible thing. Their public persona is just not that good right now.

Read Breton's article. I think he has a much better grasp of the situation than Marty Mac. And what's scary is that I'm even saying that.
 
#4
I'm sorry but I disagree. The Maloofs do NOT need to be out front on this. In fact, I think it might be the worst possible thing. Their public persona is just not that good right now.

Read Breton's article. I think he has a much better grasp of the situation than Marty Mac. And what's scary is that I'm even saying that.
I don't think its all Maloofs, but I do think this is going to take a full-force media blitz, with incredible educational concepts given, and it must be as interactive and open with the citizens of this fine city. It can't be done halfway, especially with the amount of time at hand.
 
#5
I'm sorry but I disagree. The Maloofs do NOT need to be out front on this. In fact, I think it might be the worst possible thing. Their public persona is just not that good right now.
I touched on this in a few threads a while back. I still think they need to be public. They are two very very public owners and they have that special ability to get people behind them. Public figures like them need to be talking to us, They have on everything else so why they are not now? That fact definately scares the crap out of me as far as their real motives.

Why are they not more public about this but they are with every other Kings dealings? Marco's articles have put the wrong seed in my head
 
Last edited:

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#6
They also have targets on them. People like R.E. Graswich still have jobs in large part because they have made the Maloofs their special scapegoats.

Should they be public? Yes. Should they be the most visible face for this project? I don't think so. That stresses the Maloofs. What needs to be stressed is the potential benefit to Sacramentans, even if they aren't Kings fans.

I know of a number of people who are NOT impressed with The Palms or the constant exposure of the Maloofs. They aren't necessarily sports fans, but they see the Maloofs on TV all the time and their reaction to them is NOT favorable.

My personal opinion is that opposing groups will use the image of the billionaire playboy brothers to their advantage, not ours. A new toy for the billionaire playboy Maloof brothers and their expensive NBA franchise is just such an easy image to put out there for those who are NOT really aware of what's truly at stake.

For that reason, while I think the Maloofs will, of course, be part of this, I again feel the need to put a better face on the project as a whole. I sure wish Joe Serna was still alive...
 
#8
Put it that way VF and I also agree 100%.

I love politics so this is going to be interesting. We will finally see is SACTO a bit town as it thinks or a small town as its perceived.
 
#9
They also have targets on them. People like R.E. Graswich still have jobs in large part because they have made the Maloofs their special scapegoats.

Should they be public? Yes. Should they be the most visible face for this project? I don't think so. That stresses the Maloofs. What needs to be stressed is the potential benefit to Sacramentans, even if they aren't Kings fans.

I know of a number of people who are NOT impressed with The Palms or the constant exposure of the Maloofs. They aren't necessarily sports fans, but they see the Maloofs on TV all the time and their reaction to them is NOT favorable.

My personal opinion is that opposing groups will use the image of the billionaire playboy brothers to their advantage, not ours. A new toy for the billionaire playboy Maloof brothers and their expensive NBA franchise is just such an easy image to put out there for those who are NOT really aware of what's truly at stake.

For that reason, while I think the Maloofs will, of course, be part of this, I again feel the need to put a better face on the project as a whole. I sure wish Joe Serna was still alive...
Amen to that!!...he was our Richard Daly(mayor of Chicago). Joe didnt give a damn about idiocy and just got things done for the betterment of the City of Sacramento, he was a visionary that believed in true growth and had foresight, and was a huge supporter in sports and entertainment in Sacramento...and if it wasnt for him, the Kings would probably be in Nashville. Oh, and I couldnt agree more with everything else you said in this post, VF.:) This is gospel.