Marco Belinelli Interview With Italian Media

lwc

Starter
I am hoping to listen to the full exclusive interview Marco gave to sportando.com about his thoughts on the season and the organization. Love him or hate him, Marco was an important part of the last Spurs championship as a knock-down 3-point shooter. He also spent two seasons with the Spurs and made the playoffs with 3 different teams.

Here is an excerpt:
“There wasn’t a group from the start of the season,” said Belinelli. “Karl didn’t want Cousins and Cousins didn’t want Karl as coach. It’s pretty hard to play well in a situation like that. At the beginning it looked like Ranadive was the man calling the shots but then Divac came in, trying to be the peacemaker between Cousins and Karl.”
“I saw some very bad stuff in the locker room,” Belinelli added. “Coming from a perfect organization like the Spurs, I was pretty surprised to see stuff like that.”


Read the full story here
 
I am waiting to see the rest, or better, for the interview to be released, Never quite trust some of these home outlets to not sensationalize.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lwc
Marco trying to add the Kings and Spurs organization in the same breath just isn't fair, I'm sure Marco saw first hand what kind of dysfunction runs through out those walls in Cowbell Kingdom. All we can do now is hope that Vivek has backed off for good and let Vlade do his job the best way he knows how, there will be some downs and he has to accept that and take the bumps along the road without repercussions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lwc
I wonder if Vlade's influence began to change the atmosphere at least from Marco's perspective. I hope so. We need the Marco of old to re-emerge. I doubt if he is easily tradable. Cousins and all of us would be the beneficiary of Curry, Belinelli and, ahem, Ryan Anderson to open up the court. It might not be so difficult to achieve. Curry is ours unless we screw it up. Belinelli can't go anywhere unless we wish it. Ryan wants to play for a team that allows him to be near his family. Somebody mentioned a sign and trade with Rudy Gay. Seems fair from our viewpoint.
 
I wonder if Vlade's influence began to change the atmosphere at least from Marco's perspective. I hope so. We need the Marco of old to re-emerge. I doubt if he is easily tradable. Cousins and all of us would be the beneficiary of Curry, Belinelli and, ahem, Ryan Anderson to open up the court. It might not be so difficult to achieve. Curry is ours unless we screw it up. Belinelli can't go anywhere unless we wish it. Ryan wants to play for a team that allows him to be near his family. Somebody mentioned a sign and trade with Rudy Gay. Seems fair from our viewpoint.

I agree. Marco's value is at an all-time low, I'd guess, and I don't think it's worth expending assets to get rid of him. He had a career-worst season, and I think we are best served hoping and seeing if a new coach and system allow him to get back to where he was before.

But I'm curious of the specifics regarding his comments.
 
I agree. Marco's value is at an all-time low, I'd guess, and I don't think it's worth expending assets to get rid of him. He had a career-worst season, and I think we are best served hoping and seeing if a new coach and system allow him to get back to where he was before.

But I'm curious of the specifics regarding his comments.
I was lazy. Are there comments written anywhere?
 
I was lazy. Are there comments written anywhere?

The original article at Sportando is just an excerpt of a longer interview, from what I can tell. In the excerpt he says "I saw some very bad stuff in the locker room . . . Coming from a perfect organization like the Spurs, I was pretty surprised to see stuff like that".

I'm curious if he expands on this at all in the full interview, which I do not believe has been published yet.
 
The original article at Sportando is just an excerpt of a longer interview, from what I can tell. In the excerpt he says "I saw some very bad stuff in the locker room . . . Coming from a perfect organization like the Spurs, I was pretty surprised to see stuff like that".

I'm curious if he expands on this at all in the full interview, which I do not believe has been published yet.

I'm pretty sure things like Demarcus cursing out the coach in front of the entire lockerroom are what he is talking about. Team is better off with both Karl and Cousins gone. Marco would be a type that would have a bounce back season with those toxic personalities gone from the locker room. I'm really just wanting a clean slate right now. It would be great to move into the new building with a roster of guys that you don't have to walk on eggshells to please. When was the last time Sacramento Kings news was about basketball and not this stupid melodrama?
 
I'm pretty sure things like Demarcus cursing out the coach in front of the entire lockerroom are what he is talking about. Team is better off with both Karl and Cousins gone. Marco would be a type that would have a bounce back season with those toxic personalities gone from the locker room. I'm really just wanting a clean slate right now. It would be great to move into the new building with a roster of guys that you don't have to walk on eggshells to please. When was the last time Sacramento Kings news was about basketball and not this stupid melodrama?

Completely agree, lets trade the best big man in the league so the mighty Bellineli can have a bounce back season.
 
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure things like Demarcus cursing out the coach in front of the entire lockerroom are what he is talking about. Team is better off with both Karl and Cousins gone. Marco would be a type that would have a bounce back season with those toxic personalities gone from the locker room. I'm really just wanting a clean slate right now. It would be great to move into the new building with a roster of guys that you don't have to walk on eggshells to please. When was the last time Sacramento Kings news was about basketball and not this stupid melodrama?
The last time was when the franchise seemed devoted to being a great team and winning. In the last years of the Maloofs, that was not the case. In the first years of Vivek, he had his own strange ideas he wanted to impose on the team. I think it gets very difficult to apply blame to the absolute crap that has been put on the floor in the last decade. BTW, Caron Butler did not agree with you about Boogie's personality in the locker room. Who should we believe?

I think we should tip toe about in making changes at this point. Making a huge sweep of changes could set us back another decade if we misread cause and effect. We have made one big step in firing Karl. Now let us step back and see what the effect of that is before making any other major moves.
 
I'm pretty sure things like Demarcus cursing out the coach in front of the entire lockerroom are what he is talking about. Team is better off with both Karl and Cousins gone. Marco would be a type that would have a bounce back season with those toxic personalities gone from the locker room. I'm really just wanting a clean slate right now. It would be great to move into the new building with a roster of guys that you don't have to walk on eggshells to please. When was the last time Sacramento Kings news was about basketball and not this stupid melodrama?

If you want to get rid of the drama, then start winning games. I have yet to witness ANY losing team that didn't end up surrounded by drama.
 
I'm pretty sure Marco was floored by the coach actively warring against the best player on the team, playing players to a system that didn't fit them, throwing players, especially rookies, under the bus. I am so looking forward seeing what we can do with a coach on the same page
 
lol

Vivek.
Vlade.
Karl.
Cousins.

So which one of thoses guys caused you to play like complete **** all season again?

Marco, you better pray you find that jumpshot this summer or this stint in Sac will definitely be your last contact.
 
If you look at Belinelli's raw numbers, the guys shooting was astronomical in clutch situations. Just look at his playoff shooting. In the championship season (just a few years ago, not forever), he shot over 42% from 3. His last season as a Spur, he shot 40% for the whole season. This year? 30%. :( If you look at his career numbers, this is by far his least efficient and highest usage season. I think Marco has proven that he is a specialist. He is a perfect 7th man spot-shooter. The problem is that with Seth's height and Marco's poor defense, you cannot play them at the same time. Both are excellent 3-shooters (Marco has the career track-record, Seth has the recent evidence) but neither are good enough defenders at the 2 to start for a playoff team. Therein lies the issue. Looking around, Seth is essentially 6'2 and Marco is 6'5. If one of them were to have the raw measurables to play the 2 it would be Marco. Can he be taught defense though?

With Omri and Rudy being good enough rebounders to buy a few minutes at the 4 spot, they both can buy the team a few minutes for Marco to play the 3 and Seth to play the 1 or 2 against certain teams. However, those minutes and those teams are few are far between. One of them has to emerge as a solid defender at the 1 or 2 long-term.
 
lol

Vivek.
Vlade.
Karl.
Cousins.

So which one of thoses guys caused you to play like complete **** all season again?

Marco, you better pray you find that jumpshot this summer or this stint in Sac will definitely be your last contact.

Everyone works to their absolute best in a toxic environment where everyone hates each other and are constantly at each others throats.
 
lol

Vivek.
Vlade.
Karl.
Cousins.

So which one of thoses guys caused you to play like complete **** all season again?

Marco, you better pray you find that jumpshot this summer or this stint in Sac will definitely be your last contact.

I'd agree that if you're a pro you need to learn to block out distractions and do your job and Marco struggled with that. But in terms of someone being directly responsible for Marco's down year, Karl has to take some blame. He tried to treat Belinelli like Reggie Miller, Rip Hamilton or even Peja. Marco is a good shooter but having him curl off all these pin down screens isn't his game and it isn't how he was used in San Antonio.

Yeah, fixing the culture should help everybody play a bit better but if you want a bounce back year from Belinelli it should start with using him properly.
 
Last edited:
I'd agree that if you're a pro you need to learn to block out distractions and do your job and Marco struggled with that. But in terms of someone being directly responsible for Marco's down year, Karl has to take some blame. He tried to treat Belinelli like Reggie Miller, Rip Hamilton or even Peja. Marco is a good shooter but having him curl off all these pin down screens isn't his game and it isn't how he was used in San Antonio.

Yeah, fixing the culture should help everybody play a bit better but if you want a bounce back year from Belinelli it should start with using him properly.

There's been a lot of talk about "using [Belinelli] properly" over the course of the season. At this point I've heard just about every way we saw him being used accused of not being the "proper" way. So rather than just talk about it - here's a good compilation of his baskets in one season with the Spurs.


I think what we find is: hardly any shots curling off screens in the elbow/free throw line area. We do see him attacking the basket and creating offense (a lot of such plays aren't shown in a video comprising mostly him scoring - but he was very much a facilitator as well), so any argument about the Spurs not having him handle the ball is not true. We also see that (as one naturally would in a highlight video) he was knocking down a lot the open 3s that he was simply missing this season on very similar plays. We got a taste of him moving off the ball and cutting to the basket this season, but those plays require quick and crisp passes from bigs in the high post that we don't get from WCS or Koufos (or Cousins this season if memory serves me correctly. Most of the time Cousins would put the ball down and drive to the rim). But as far as give and gos on dribble hand-offs go, we did see some of that particularly with Koufos. There are a number of plays where the Spurs ran a pin down for Marco to get corner or wing 3s, and we got a taste of that as well in some late game situations and plays out of timeouts.

My conclusion: Based on the Spurs' use of Marco alone and holding that as the "proper" way to use him (questionable as it excludes summer international play and such) - the main area in which Karl "misused" Marco was having him come off screens for quick midrange pullups. Having him handle the ball and create offense, while at times excessive was not completely out of the ordinary or unthinkable. In addition, we need to factor in not only the plays and offense that Karl ran but the personnel on the team and their ability to allow Marco to have the kind of space or plays off of movement that we witnessed on the Spurs. WCS and Koufos are not Boris Diaw and Tim Duncan (not only in them passing, but think of all the baskets around the rim that KK blew off PnRs). Lastly, we have to accept that Belinelli himself simply shot poorly all season, even on open shots from 3.

The point of all this is to manage fans' expectations for next season if Belinelli is still on the team and the roster/rotation remains largely intact. While I certainly hope for an improvement under a new coach I don't think it's fair to say that George Karl alone was responsible or even chiefly responsible for a bad season-long performance by an NBA veteran. In my personal opinion which I hope I have explained in this post, Marco was not as "misused" as some would have others believe.
 

Glad you brought these two quotes up. It really goes to show you how much of a losing mentality hangs around the franchise in general, no matter what players you bring in. If it doesn't mesh with what your head coach and front office want to do, it's all for not.

Belinelli mentioned he wants to win now and I'm sure he expected that, but not the whole team followed suite.
 
There's been a lot of talk about "using [Belinelli] properly" over the course of the season. At this point I've heard just about every way we saw him being used accused of not being the "proper" way. So rather than just talk about it - here's a good compilation of his baskets in one season with the Spurs.


I think what we find is: hardly any shots curling off screens in the elbow/free throw line area. We do see him attacking the basket and creating offense (a lot of such plays aren't shown in a video comprising mostly him scoring - but he was very much a facilitator as well), so any argument about the Spurs not having him handle the ball is not true. We also see that (as one naturally would in a highlight video) he was knocking down a lot the open 3s that he was simply missing this season on very similar plays. We got a taste of him moving off the ball and cutting to the basket this season, but those plays require quick and crisp passes from bigs in the high post that we don't get from WCS or Koufos (or Cousins this season if memory serves me correctly. Most of the time Cousins would put the ball down and drive to the rim). But as far as give and gos on dribble hand-offs go, we did see some of that particularly with Koufos. There are a number of plays where the Spurs ran a pin down for Marco to get corner or wing 3s, and we got a taste of that as well in some late game situations and plays out of timeouts.

My conclusion: Based on the Spurs' use of Marco alone and holding that as the "proper" way to use him (questionable as it excludes summer international play and such) - the main area in which Karl "misused" Marco was having him come off screens for quick midrange pullups. Having him handle the ball and create offense, while at times excessive was not completely out of the ordinary or unthinkable. In addition, we need to factor in not only the plays and offense that Karl ran but the personnel on the team and their ability to allow Marco to have the kind of space or plays off of movement that we witnessed on the Spurs. WCS and Koufos are not Boris Diaw and Tim Duncan (not only in them passing, but think of all the baskets around the rim that KK blew off PnRs). Lastly, we have to accept that Belinelli himself simply shot poorly all season, even on open shots from 3.

The point of all this is to manage fans' expectations for next season if Belinelli is still on the team and the roster/rotation remains largely intact. While I certainly hope for an improvement under a new coach I don't think it's fair to say that George Karl alone was responsible or even chiefly responsible for a bad season-long performance by an NBA veteran. In my personal opinion which I hope I have explained in this post, Marco was not as "misused" as some would have others believe.
Agree, just as it was not the case with Willie's usage. Easy to "blame" Karl - for everything.
 
There's been a lot of talk about "using [Belinelli] properly" over the course of the season. At this point I've heard just about every way we saw him being used accused of not being the "proper" way. So rather than just talk about it - here's a good compilation of his baskets in one season with the Spurs.


I think what we find is: hardly any shots curling off screens in the elbow/free throw line area. We do see him attacking the basket and creating offense (a lot of such plays aren't shown in a video comprising mostly him scoring - but he was very much a facilitator as well), so any argument about the Spurs not having him handle the ball is not true. We also see that (as one naturally would in a highlight video) he was knocking down a lot the open 3s that he was simply missing this season on very similar plays. We got a taste of him moving off the ball and cutting to the basket this season, but those plays require quick and crisp passes from bigs in the high post that we don't get from WCS or Koufos (or Cousins this season if memory serves me correctly. Most of the time Cousins would put the ball down and drive to the rim). But as far as give and gos on dribble hand-offs go, we did see some of that particularly with Koufos. There are a number of plays where the Spurs ran a pin down for Marco to get corner or wing 3s, and we got a taste of that as well in some late game situations and plays out of timeouts.

My conclusion: Based on the Spurs' use of Marco alone and holding that as the "proper" way to use him (questionable as it excludes summer international play and such) - the main area in which Karl "misused" Marco was having him come off screens for quick midrange pullups. Having him handle the ball and create offense, while at times excessive was not completely out of the ordinary or unthinkable. In addition, we need to factor in not only the plays and offense that Karl ran but the personnel on the team and their ability to allow Marco to have the kind of space or plays off of movement that we witnessed on the Spurs. WCS and Koufos are not Boris Diaw and Tim Duncan (not only in them passing, but think of all the baskets around the rim that KK blew off PnRs). Lastly, we have to accept that Belinelli himself simply shot poorly all season, even on open shots from 3.

The point of all this is to manage fans' expectations for next season if Belinelli is still on the team and the roster/rotation remains largely intact. While I certainly hope for an improvement under a new coach I don't think it's fair to say that George Karl alone was responsible or even chiefly responsible for a bad season-long performance by an NBA veteran. In my personal opinion which I hope I have explained in this post, Marco was not as "misused" as some would have others believe.

Very good post. Vets, who have established themselves rarely fall off that much in their ability to shoot the ball, no matter the coach or situation. Most of our other vets did their thing, despite the turmoil and mounting losses.

My biggest issue with Marco this past season was that even if they ran a play for him off a curl or whatever, he didn't HAVE to take the shot if it wasn't open.
 
This comment from Marco is intriguing and a bit worrisome: "Coming from San Antonio I immediately noticed that several teammates in Sacramento hadn't a winning mentality. But I do have a winning mentality and I want to win now."

Besides talent, having a die for the team and the win mentality is paramount for success. Anyone, and I mean anyone, on the team that doesn't have this attitude needs to go, now.

I would like to get forum members opinions about which King's players they believe have a true winning mentality. Maybe even a poll.
 
This comment from Marco is intriguing and a bit worrisome: "Coming from San Antonio I immediately noticed that several teammates in Sacramento hadn't a winning mentality. But I do have a winning mentality and I want to win now."

Besides talent, having a die for the team and the win mentality is paramount for success. Anyone, and I mean anyone, on the team that doesn't have this attitude needs to go, now.

I would like to get forum members opinions about which King's players they believe have a true winning mentality. Maybe even a poll.
Should we get the tar and feathers gathered up before the pillory is built or wait until and the witches have been rounded up first?
 
This comment from Marco is intriguing and a bit worrisome: "Coming from San Antonio I immediately noticed that several teammates in Sacramento hadn't a winning mentality. But I do have a winning mentality and I want to win now."

Besides talent, having a die for the team and the win mentality is paramount for success. Anyone, and I mean anyone, on the team that doesn't have this attitude needs to go, now.

I would like to get forum members opinions about which King's players they believe have a true winning mentality. Maybe even a poll.

I can tell you that Marco wouldn't be on my list, that's for sure. I don't want to speculate on who he might be referring to, but he needs to look in a mirror if he thinks he played with a "winning mentality" this season. I'm not questioning his desire to win, but George Karl's incredibly loose leash with regards to shot selection and defensive effort benefited Marco more than any other player in terms of unearned playing time -- and did him no favors in terms of actual production. He may be a consummate professional in the locker room, but games are won and lost based on what you do on the court and he was throwing up straight junk out there.
 
I can tell you that Marco wouldn't be on my list, that's for sure. I don't want to speculate on who he might be referring to, but he needs to look in a mirror if he thinks he played with a "winning mentality" this season. I'm not questioning his desire to win, but George Karl's incredibly loose leash with regards to shot selection and defensive effort benefited Marco more than any other player in terms of unearned playing time -- and did him no favors in terms of actual production. He may be a consummate professional in the locker room, but games are won and lost based on what you do on the court and he was throwing up straight junk out there.

This board put the "S" in speculation and that's what I'm looking for. Kinda quiet around here lately so I thought I'd stir the pot a little.
 
Last edited:
Would be a good poll. My votes:

Winning mentality: Rajon, DeMarcus, Darren, WCS, Seth, Quincy.

Not winning mentality: the rest of em (including Marco). Maybe KK has it but I never really saw him bring any extra to the table.
 
Back
Top