He's leading his team in points, rebounds, assists, steals and blocks. If that doesn't make him the top candidate for MVP, what does? I knew he was doing good but those stats just about blew me away.
I always think it's kind of sad that it's always just LeBron, Wade and Kobe in these polls. The fact that, production and otherwise, Chris Paul is at the same level as those three (and, at least production wise, vastly superior to Kobe) is just overlooked. Sometimes I wish the Hornets were playing at a faster pace, because if they were, he'd get at least the MVP recognition of, say, Dwyane Wade.
Yeah, but it's usually the best players on the best teams that get noticed for it. The Hornets are in what, 7th? And they've got a pretty good roster
I always think it's kind of sad that it's always just LeBron, Wade and Kobe in these polls. The fact that, production and otherwise, Chris Paul is at the same level as those three (and, at least production wise, vastly superior to Kobe) is just overlooked. Sometimes I wish the Hornets were playing at a faster pace, because if they were, he'd get at least the MVP recognition of, say, Dwyane Wade.
However, they have a better record than the Heat, despite being absolutely ravaged by injuries all season and Chris Paul is playing better than Kobe Bryant. On my personal list, Paul is second, ahead of both Wade and Bryant.
lebron has it hands down... without lebron this season would be a boring waste of time watching the lakers anc celtics all season... chris paul is good but his team isnt playing well enough to warrant a mvp consideration. if the magic were #1 in the league or at least the east he would be in the conversation as well....
but lebron james is the best player in the nba... period....
Best player in the NBA? Absolutely. MVP? Not necessarily. Contrary to people's beliefs, it's not the same thing.
I totally forgot about Chris Paul, to be honest about it. I did include the "other" option...
It does not matter so terribly, since, to my mind, there is no justifiable reason to put anyone ahead of James, so don't worry. Also, I believe that Chris Paul, as mentioned in my initial post, is more a victim of circumstances than anything else. If he were playing on a faster team, he would put up (even) bigger numbers, be featured more in popular outlets and so on. As it is now, it's quite impossible for him to do so and he will thus not garner the MVP consideration that he merits. Anywhere.
It is in this case.
I've repeatedly mentioned that the MVP formula has ALWAYS been:
Best Player + On A Great (50+min, 55+ usually) Team + Having A Great Year + Is The Man On His Team
Now as soon as I throw that out there, everybody sttarts jumping in with their own formulations, but your own formulation doesn't matter. The above is THE formulation in the NBA, and always has been. You walk backward through the MVPs, they all confrom to that formula, and just as importantly, the people who don't win do not confrom. Hence Kobe can average 35, but his team did not win enough, so he did not win it. Boston can have a great year last year, but with none of their stars having a great year (statistically) there was no MVP there. Basically look to the Top 5 to maybe Top 8 on the outside teams in the league, and your MVP is in there.
This year 3 players have the complete formula -- LeBron, Kobe and Howard. Wade's team has not won enough. And really at this point neither has CP3's. Nobody on the Spurs or Boston is exceptional enough. Realistically it is LeBron and Kobe, and while it could come down to the best record thing as it perhaps did between Kobe and CP3 last year, its also true that Kobe already "got his" last year, and the LeBron/Cavs explosion this year feels fresher.
Not that I disagree, but put ANY of the candidates on a faster team n they'd put up bigger numbers. Faster pace=more possessions=more stats.
Don't forget that they're in the East. What Wade is doing this season is extremely important to his team, and that's underscored by the fact that he was out all last year and they only won 15 games. So there's no denying that he's vitally important to the Heat's chances. No doubt about it.Yeah I know, but Wade was injured last season, and the Heat had the worst record in the league. Now virtually the same team + Wade, and they're 4th or 5th in the conference. Wade doesn't have either David West on his team.
Note: I am by no means saying Chris Paul shouldn't get consideration. Heck, Dwight Howard deserves it too, but he isn't even in the equation either. Paul's another of my favorite players, being a Wake Forest fan n all, but the expectations were high for the Hornets this year, and they haven't lived up to them