If Bavetta was officiating it probably would have been a foul on Ginobili![]()
Kobe has goten away with that crap for years of throwing elbows and flailing to create space. For teh average player this should result in an offinsve foul weater or not the contact was intended or not. The BIG problem is that no one has called him for this crap and in some cases the whiner has actually goten the foul call. I can;t speak for everyone fortunate enough not to be a Laker fan but my feeking is MOST of us are dam glad to see him finely called for it and in truye cry baby form Kome palns to whine, snivvile and bully his way out of it.
I saw the play and to be honest I I don;t see how ANYONE can claim to know Kobe's intentions and frankly it does not matter he threw a extreemly wide elbow (flailing his arm is more accurate) in an aparent attempt to keep the defender (Ginobli) at a distance. Well sorry Kobe inniated contact with a defender that makes it a foul, the force makes some intent clear... Kobe knew IF anyone tried to get clse they would feel it for a few days.
The refs don't call it beceause it's Kobe. Not the first guy to flail and get away with it and beceause he HAS it is now his "natural style" Just like Karl Malone's swinging elbows on rebounds and kick when he elevated... got away with so kep it up... The moves should have been offensive fouls and on very rare occasions were called as such.omg, you are so freaking bias. so transparent it's laughable. kobe does this move all the time to draw a shooting foul, that was his intention. it's his natural reaction to deflections, it always has been, manu just happened to be in a bad place. anyone who thinks he thought up a scheme to hit him in the face after getting blocked in under a second while trying to win a game is not too bright. also explain if it was so obvious why didn't the refs call a foul?
The refs don't call it beceause it's Kobe. Not the first guy to flail and get away with it and beceause he HAS it is now his "natural style" Just like Karl Malone's swinging elbows on rebounds and kick when he elevated... got away with so kep it up... The moves should have been offensive fouls and on very rare occasions were called as such.
kobe does this move all the time to draw a shooting foul, that was his intention. it's his natural reaction to deflections, it always has been, manu just happened to be in a bad place.
you talk as if he's the only one who does it. a lot of players flail their arms after shot deflections or some sort of contact on the shot and don't get an offensive foul, in fact i rarely see it called as an offensive foul. it's a strategy that's been around for a long time.
News flash - it's also a foul every time he does it.
Yeah, but how many hit their opponent in the face like Kobe has a habit of doing?
Look, I know your hero just got suspended for a game. Deal with it.
Kobe's contant elbow flailing, intentional or not, is ILLEGAL. Just because you say it's his natural style does not make it right or warranted in any situation. The players, and Kobe is no exception, are employees of the league, they need to change to fit the rules, not the other way around.
if it's so illegal why aren't there more offensive foul calls on the play? when the league is calling so many freaking fouls, don't you think it's a little hypocritical to start blaming the players for trying to draw fouls to get an advantage? the nba can try forever to make basketball a non-contact sport but they'll fail every time. the morality of kobe's ARM (not elbow) flailing is irrelevant and i never commented on it either way. i said his intent is always to draw a foul with that move, however the league is saying (and basing their grounds for suspension on) that his intention wasn't to draw a foul but to strike ginobili. there is no precedent for this and there has been no recent rule changes to warrant a precedent out of the blue. this was typical picking out on an individual for "other" reasons. you want to talk about what the players need to do, i say what the league needs to do is stay consistent. if it's a foul then they should start calling it, not non-calling it then slapping that player with a suspension two days later on the night of the game and not giving him the option of an appeal.
If he was trying to draw a foul, wouldn't that mean he'd actually have to come into contact with Ginobli? By trying to use his arm to draw a foul, he would have try to initiate contact with Ginobli, which is what I'm assuming the league perceived as a strike. Still, I'll concede that a suspension wasn't necessarily warranted, however Kobe's gotten away with that stuff for far too long and nevertheless I'm glad that he got the suspension if it'll at least cause him to think twice before he tries to pull something like that.
i wouldn't say he was trying to "draw contact", but rather immitate the motions of being fouled or in other words creating the appearance of contact on the shot.
a lot of players "get away" with that stuff, hell reggie miller made a career out of it. if the league wants to stop that then they should start calling fouls on it, a foul was not called on bryant. so how does all this lead to a suspension? that's why the nba had to play it off as if their opinion was that it was intentional and that he wasn't trying to draw a foul because they know there are no rules that would support a suspension on unintentional contact. it's entirely unprecedented, completely made up for the purpose of taking kobe out.