LA Times: Lakers have no home security

Elise10

Starter
http://www.latimes.com/sports/baske...ry?page=2&coll=la-headlines-sports-nba-lakers

Lakers have no home security

Last-place Kings come right in, shoot 52.7% and steal away with a 116-108 victory. It is L.A.'s sixth loss in seven games at Staples Center.
By Mike Bresnahan, Times Staff Writer
March 3, 2007

Add another unsettling piece of uncertainty for the Lakers.

Their struggles against losing teams have been well-documented, but an additional pattern has popped up in recent weeks — an inability to win home games.

Friday night brought a little of both, the punchless Sacramento Kings playing at Staples Center, and the results looking to be more of the same.

The Lakers' defense was utterly deflated, giving up 92 points through three quarters, and a sixth loss in the last seven home games became official after a 116-108 setback against Sacramento.

There have already been losses to Portland (twice), Charlotte (twice), New York, Seattle, Memphis and Milwaukee, so it really wasn't overly surprising when the Kings (26-32) crawled out of the Pacific Division cellar with a victory, although it did end the Lakers' three-game winning streak.

The Lakers had plenty of scorers — even Aaron McKie had 12 points — but so did the Kings, the beginning and end of the problems for the home team.

The Lakers were 24th in the league in scoring defense before Friday, giving up 101.8 points a game, and it was obvious to all that there are still issues to be resolved, even after an uplifting, defense-driven victory earlier in the week at Utah.

There were even some boos in the last two minutes of the second quarter, and again in the final minute of the third quarter. The Lakers trailed at halftime, 65-48, and after the third quarter, 92-74.

Toward the end of it all, as the Lakers faded away, Coach Phil Jackson sat back in his chair, arms crossed and a look of disbelief on his face.

"We can do that all the way through the season," Jackson said. "That's what .500 teams do. We're not a .500 team, but we're playing like one."

This was not how they wanted to leave L.A. for a four-game trip against Phoenix, Minnesota, Milwaukee and Philadelphia. Their game Sunday against the Suns would have been an intriguing state-of-the-program update, but the Lakers can't even make statements at home these days.

The Lakers did get back Kwame Brown, who missed 27 games because of a severely sprained left ankle, but he wasn't much of a help, going scoreless and taking three rebounds in 20 minutes.

Maurice Evans didn't play because of a bruised right knee, and Lamar Odom sustained a left shoulder injury after being fouled by Sacramento center Brad Miller with 2:47 to play. He didn't leave the game immediately, but he will undergo an MRI exam today.

Brown was back Friday, but not Luke Walton, who sat out his 16th game because of a sprained right ankle. He underwent an MRI exam Friday, with the results to be interpreted Monday by the specialist.

"It feels good walking and then I try to play basketball, and I just can't," Walton said. "Cutting and jumping, I can't do."

As for the game, Kobe Bryant had 30 points and 10 assists, and Odom had 26 points, 13 rebounds and six assists, but the Kings also had notable efforts.

Mike Bibby had 33 points, Kevin Martin had 20 and Ron Artest had 19. The Kings also received 12 points from a couple of bench players, Corliss Williamson and Shareef Abdur-Rahim.

It's getting redundant to say, but the Lakers' defense again did them in. The Kings started out on a 10-0 run and, by the end, after all the uncontested layups and converted pick-and-rolls, had made 52.7% of their shots.

"We think we make one step forward and we make two steps back in that department," Jackson said.

The Lakers were sloppy with the ball, finishing with 19 turnovers. Jackson wasn't thrilled with the officiating, either, after the Kings made 29 of 37 free throws, the Lakers 19 of 21.

"The referees bought into a lot of that flopping stuff that was going on out there," he said. "There were way too many foul shots, particularly in the first half."

**I wouldn't call it stealing a win, when for the most part the Lakers just stood there and watched the 4th placed Kings go by
 
**I wouldn't call it stealing a win, when for the most part the Lakers just stood there and watched the 4th placed Kings go by
The Kings have never, ever defeated the Lakers in a game. Never at any time have they ever outplayed the Lakers or been the better team. Not even for one night. Its always, they played bad and "gave" us the game or its the officiating.:rolleyes:

In a Laker forum, Kobe was good for "not complaining" to the refs last night. What the heck game were they watching? He complained after almost every single foul call. I don't uderstand why he didn't get a technical when he was "lecturing" an official and wagging his finger in the guy's face.

They were also complaining about Kevin and Bibby flailing around to get fouls called and so many of our guys were traveling and not called for it. I'd agree there was some of that, but those things are practically Kobe's modus operandi, but it's okay when it's Kobe.:rolleyes:
 
Kings shot 37 free throws compared to 21 by the lakers at their court. Bibby shot 14 Vs Kobe at 9. Lakers were called for 30 fouls vs kings at 19.

Lakers out rebounded the kings 44-25 and the assists were even

Typically at a home game the home team is supposed to get more calls but that didnt happen and I am not defending their actions but it seems like this game was out of the norm for a typical nba game (I dont agree with home cooking but I have said many times its a business and they tend to do that )

Now you are just reading more into what the local press says and you choose to react. When the lakers beat the jazz and kobe took 24 free throws you should have seen the salt lake city press, they were even blunt in saying that the lakers won from the free throw line.

Its all part of the game :)
By the way any objective kings fan would know that the kings this season are shooting way more free throws and that too for a team that is known for jump shooting. just ask brick about the free throws ;)

Anyways I think its a precursor to the suns game where I expect things to turn around the other way (If I understand stern well )
 
It's a good point that we shouldn't be too aroused by what the local press says. That said, it is the LA Times, with quite a decent reputation and one of the larger readerships in the country. It's certainly much closer to the New York Times than to the Salt Lake Tribune. It is certainly not the LA Daily News or the Pasadena Sun-Times. Furthermore, there are two pro basketball teams in the area! I think that it is reasonable for one to expect the Los Angeles Times to hold a more "objective view" than the aforementioned, more "local", newspapers, so reading such a article did surprise me a little bit.
 
Typically at a home game the home team is supposed to get more calls but that didnt happen and I am not defending their actions but it seems like this game was out of the norm for a typical nba game (I dont agree with home cooking but I have said many times its a business and they tend to do that )

Why would you think that?
 
Why would you think that?

Have you noticed that the tv replays of fouls are no longer shown and disected to the level they used to do it a couple of years ago. They only show replays where they are absolutely sure that the refs made the right call.

Its not something that only i think, analysts, announcers, players and coaches think that too.

Why do u think otherwise
 
Have you noticed that the tv replays of fouls are no longer shown and disected to the level they used to do it a couple of years ago. They only show replays where they are absolutely sure that the refs made the right call.

Its not something that only i think, analysts, announcers, players and coaches think that too.

Why do u think otherwise

So why again are the Los Angeles Lakers (The number one market in the world, at worst number 2) getting conspired against by the NBA? What do they have to gain from their top market team losing? And what do they have to gain from the Kings winning?
 
The Kings have never, ever defeated the Lakers in a game. Never at any time have they ever outplayed the Lakers or been the better team. Not even for one night. Its always, they played bad and "gave" us the game or its the officiating.:rolleyes:

In a Laker forum, Kobe was good for "not complaining" to the refs last night. What the heck game were they watching? He complained after almost every single foul call. I don't uderstand why he didn't get a technical when he was "lecturing" an official and wagging his finger in the guy's face.

They were also complaining about Kevin and Bibby flailing around to get fouls called and so many of our guys were traveling and not called for it. I'd agree there was some of that, but those things are practically Kobe's modus operandi, but it's okay when it's Kobe.:rolleyes:

Great post...
 
///
"The referees bought into a lot of that flopping stuff that was going on out there," he said. "There were way too many foul shots, particularly in the first half."

...

Doesn't Phil have a nasty name for coaches who blame the refs when they lose?

What a hypocrite.
 
It's a good point that we shouldn't be too aroused by what the local press says. That said, it is the LA Times, with quite a decent reputation and one of the larger readerships in the country. It's certainly much closer to the New York Times than to the Salt Lake Tribune. It is certainly not the LA Daily News or the Pasadena Sun-Times. Furthermore, there are two pro basketball teams in the area! I think that it is reasonable for one to expect the Los Angeles Times to hold a more "objective view" than the aforementioned, more "local", newspapers, so reading such a article did surprise me a little bit.

You didn't actually use "LA Times" and "Objective" in the same sentence did you?

HAHA!!
 
The Kings have never, ever defeated the Lakers in a game. Never at any time have they ever outplayed the Lakers or been the better team. Not even for one night. Its always, they played bad and "gave" us the game or its the officiating.:rolleyes:

In a Laker forum, Kobe was good for "not complaining" to the refs last night. What the heck game were they watching? He complained after almost every single foul call. I don't uderstand why he didn't get a technical when he was "lecturing" an official and wagging his finger in the guy's face.

They were also complaining about Kevin and Bibby flailing around to get fouls called and so many of our guys were traveling and not called for it. I'd agree there was some of that, but those things are practically Kobe's modus operandi, but it's okay when it's Kobe.:rolleyes:

They let Lamar Odom go off on the refs several times before FINALLY calling a T on him. At one point, he was jumping up and down like a 2 year old and nothing...

Oh, and Kobe lecturing a ref, even jabbing his finger in the refs face and, well, naturally he didn't get a T.

Not that we needed those extra free throws since the Kings were scoring at will anyway.

Great game.
 
Have you noticed that the tv replays of fouls are no longer shown and disected to the level they used to do it a couple of years ago. They only show replays where they are absolutely sure that the refs made the right call.

Its not something that only i think, analysts, announcers, players and coaches think that too.

Why do u think otherwise

OK, I guess I should have highlighted the part I was referring to.

Typically at a home game the home team is supposed to get more calls but that didnt happen and I am not defending their actions but it seems like this game was out of the norm for a typical nba game (I dont agree with home cooking but I have said many times its a business and they tend to do that )

Better?

I want all the games called the same for everyone.

Not sure where you were going with your response, even less sure about what kind of answer you might have wanted.
 
Phil shoudl stop worrying about the officials(who have been his personal good luck trolls for years) and try learning how to defend the pick n roll. How many years has it been? Or how many decades? He just doesn't know how to deal with the play. For years in LA the excuse was "Shaq was too slow", but with Shaq gone they still get burned relelentlessly by the play.
 
Back
Top