Kobe vs LeBron: Who Would You Rather Have?

atxrocker

Starter
http://www.cnn.com/si/si_blogs/nba/playoffs/2006/2006/05/rivalry-in-making.html?cnn=yes

After LeBron James' overtime heroics Wednesday night gave the Cavs a thrilling 121-120 win over the Wizards and a 3-2 series lead, it's hard to imagine any player more capable of winning a single game than James. Unless, of course, you imagine Kobe Bryant, whose two buzzer-beating Game 4 buckets have the Lakers poised to upset the Suns.

Amid the buzz over the infighting in Miami and the quiet efficiency of the Mavericks and Pistons, these playoffs have been about two players: LeBron and Kobe.

In his first taste of the postseason LeBron has produced like few before him, averaging a playoff-high 36.4 points, 7.6 rebounds and 5.4 assists. In five playoff games, James has accounted for more than 30 percent of the Cavs' offense.

Out West, Kobe has been, well, more LeBron than typical Kobe, eschewing the quick trigger finger he demonstrated during the regular season for a spread-the wealth approach that has allowed Lamar Odom and Kwame Brown (yes, Kwame Brown) to control the paint. Bryant may be scoring 10 points fewer per game than he did in the regular season, but he's handing out almost two more assists and grabbing an extra board as well.

LeBron vs. Kobe. It could make for the NBA's next great individual rivalry.

So who would you rather have if your Game 7 life depended on it? I'd find it impossible to bet against Kobe. LeBron may be the next Oscar Robertson wrapped in a Michael Jordan package (or, at least, number), but Kobe is the best clutch player in the game today. Kobe doesn't merely want to win; he wants to be the one who slays the other team.

But that's just one bleary-eyed man's (damn those West coast start times) opinion. What's yours?
 
James. He's already a better playmaker, and is becoming better at taking over down the stretch as time goes on.
 
LeBron. He's younger, but already shown a poise and maturity of a wise veteran. His skill and ability don't dissappoint too. If your alpha dog is a tolerant guy, it's easier to build a winning team around him.
 
Superman said:
For one game, Kobe.

For a season or the rest of their careers, LeBron.

Agreed. The LeBron thing is being really pushed, but he's not quite where Kobe is yet. It may happen next year. It may happen in the 2nd round. But for the immediate answer, I grudgingly go with Kobe. Now if anything more than the immediate is in question, sure, LeBron hands down, no questions asked.
 
Kobe. He reminds me too much of MJ. If he a had a decent team around him, I have no doubt he would have more championships under his belt. LJB is a great, great talent ... he's still only 21, with tremendous potential still left. Statitically, we know he can put up unbelieveable numbers across the board, however we still don't know if has what it takes to win it all.
 
Last edited:
Lebron....younger, less arrogant and, oh yeah, he doesn't force the best center and the best coach in the league off of the team for his own glorification.
 
kupman said:
Lebron....younger, less arrogant and, oh yeah, he doesn't force the best center and the best coach in the league off of the team for his own glorification.

i am not sure that could be said just yet. i would go with Kobe despite how much i really dont personally like him, you cant deny the guys game, plus he is very clutch.
 
id take lebron...kobe can get you points...but he cant pull down the 11 boards a game that lebron can...plus...its all about the future

any team that has lebron is a sure championchip contender within 2 to 3 years of that teams development
 
Is this even a serious question? Well then it has to be LBJ.

It might someday be Kobe if he would finally learn the lesson you can't do it all by yourself.
 
Back
Top