Koufos plays 19.5 minutes per game. Only Tolliver, Ben and Willie play less minutes. A good part of his minutes are without DMC on the floor.
Temple plays 22.3 minutes per game. Afflalo plays 24.2 mpg. I guess with Afflalos recent play things will change in the future.
Should Temple play more? I definately think so. Should Temple start? I honestly don't care at all. Should Temple finish games? Yes under all circumstances, because he is our best defender and can knock down open shots! But as far as I remember Temple is on the court in most close games in the 4th.
Now, who should start over Koufos?
Willie? You can't be serious. Willie has done nothing to earn minutes. He is coasting through games, his effort level is insulting and he isn't playing like the once in the decade athlete he is. All the athleticism in the world and he isn't using it. In this Lakers game alone, there were 4 situations, where Willie could have prevented the easy basket by quickly rotating or hustling down the floor and he simply stood there watching or trotted back, like he didn't care. He is tailormade for a high energy, weak side help defender, but he doesn't want to play like one.
Matt Barnes? His performances were shaky this season. Sadly he is declining and his body is more suited to play SF, than to play small ball 4.
Omri Casspi? From my point of view, this is the only true alternative to Koufos starting. Casspi spaces the floor, he hustles like crazy and he is bulky enough to play small ball 4. Coach Joerger seems to be realizing, how valuable Casspi can be, because he is giving more and more minutes to him. But Casspi is also needed with our bench unit, because he is one of the guys able to get something on his own on offense and is the best, when it comes to off the ball movement on this team, which makes him a good fit with a pass first PG like Lawson.
Tolliver? His shot isn't falling and when his shot isn't falling Tolliver is basically useless.
I understand the criticism. I'm a supporter of smaller lineups around Cousins and I'm not a fan or Cuz+KK. But it's not like Joerger is an idiot or like he doesn't have a clue, what he is doing with the lineups.
Joerger came into SAC and gave the initial minutes to the guys, he knew like KK and Barnes. He gave minutes to Afflalo, because he was the biggest FA addition in the offseason and of course we should find a way to make it work with Affalo to justify the money, we are paying him. Now he is starting to shake things up. Afflalo is in the dog house, because of his poor performances.
I think Joerger is getting there. We are all frustrated beyond believe. And we feel, like we are running out of time. But Joerger has to manage all the personalities on the team. He has to be cautious not to lose the team.
You don't bench a guy, who you pay 12 millions per year and who you most likely brought in to be your starting SG, right away for a guy like Garret Temple.
If you want to change the culture, you stick to the guys with the right attitude you already know at the start.
And starting big, while playing small for the majority of the minutes isn't uncommon.
Temple plays 22.3 minutes per game. Afflalo plays 24.2 mpg. I guess with Afflalos recent play things will change in the future.
Should Temple play more? I definately think so. Should Temple start? I honestly don't care at all. Should Temple finish games? Yes under all circumstances, because he is our best defender and can knock down open shots! But as far as I remember Temple is on the court in most close games in the 4th.
Now, who should start over Koufos?
Willie? You can't be serious. Willie has done nothing to earn minutes. He is coasting through games, his effort level is insulting and he isn't playing like the once in the decade athlete he is. All the athleticism in the world and he isn't using it. In this Lakers game alone, there were 4 situations, where Willie could have prevented the easy basket by quickly rotating or hustling down the floor and he simply stood there watching or trotted back, like he didn't care. He is tailormade for a high energy, weak side help defender, but he doesn't want to play like one.
Matt Barnes? His performances were shaky this season. Sadly he is declining and his body is more suited to play SF, than to play small ball 4.
Omri Casspi? From my point of view, this is the only true alternative to Koufos starting. Casspi spaces the floor, he hustles like crazy and he is bulky enough to play small ball 4. Coach Joerger seems to be realizing, how valuable Casspi can be, because he is giving more and more minutes to him. But Casspi is also needed with our bench unit, because he is one of the guys able to get something on his own on offense and is the best, when it comes to off the ball movement on this team, which makes him a good fit with a pass first PG like Lawson.
Tolliver? His shot isn't falling and when his shot isn't falling Tolliver is basically useless.
I understand the criticism. I'm a supporter of smaller lineups around Cousins and I'm not a fan or Cuz+KK. But it's not like Joerger is an idiot or like he doesn't have a clue, what he is doing with the lineups.
Joerger came into SAC and gave the initial minutes to the guys, he knew like KK and Barnes. He gave minutes to Afflalo, because he was the biggest FA addition in the offseason and of course we should find a way to make it work with Affalo to justify the money, we are paying him. Now he is starting to shake things up. Afflalo is in the dog house, because of his poor performances.
I think Joerger is getting there. We are all frustrated beyond believe. And we feel, like we are running out of time. But Joerger has to manage all the personalities on the team. He has to be cautious not to lose the team.
You don't bench a guy, who you pay 12 millions per year and who you most likely brought in to be your starting SG, right away for a guy like Garret Temple.
If you want to change the culture, you stick to the guys with the right attitude you already know at the start.
And starting big, while playing small for the majority of the minutes isn't uncommon.
But what he doesn't give you is low post scoring where you can make up for a mismatch on the one end by having two bigs where you can throw the ball into either one and punish teams on the other end.
Some nights it doesn't hurt the Kings but more often than not it contributes to slow starts and having to play out of a hole. Even the Lakers last night jumped out to an early lead.
And tomorrow it means Cousins or Koufos having to defend Ryan Anderson all the way out at the free throw line.
If that's the lineup we trot out I'll be frustrated. The Rockets just shot 43 threes and hit on nearly 40% of them against the Nets. Ryno put up 19 points. It's a bad matchup we can see coming. It was like the Raptor game at home (won on that official review) where Joerger started Lawson and Collison against Lowry and DeRozan. DeRozan ended up having an off game overall but early on he was just too big for our PGs to handle forcing an early move.
This is one thing I don't understand. I get sticking with one lineup to see if it will gel by why experiment against with a new lineup when playing a team that is so well set up to exploit it?
Why not make a lineup change that gives the Kings a better chance against that night's opponent?
If we see Lawson and Collison starting at the guard spots and Cousins and Koufos as the bigs against the Rockets it could be an awful 1st quarter. Temple should start the game guarding Harden. The team should put Cousins at center and someone more mobile (Tolliver? Cauley-Stein? Casspi with Barnes or Gay at SF?) at the four spot.
I do feel like an already struggling team is too often shooting itself in the foot with poor matchups to start the game. Instead of having to change to a lineup that claws its way back into a game after halftime, why not start with that scrappy group to begin games?