Makes players like Kuzma at 25 million a year and still signed long term more realistic.
I hear ya. I just desperately want to see a trade happen that improves the Kings. A lot of buyers and not sellers.Wash your mouth out with soap!
I pretty much put the same thing out earlier in this thread, but doesn’t seem likely that will happen. For one thing Toronto isn’t interested in that return.Let’s pretend it is Barnes, huerter, Mitchell for Siakam. If the worry is siakam doesnt re-sign we would be 41 million under next years projected cap. That would give us freedom to get Malik paid. His contract looks to be in the 20 mil a year range. Would still be able to get players in at least the caliber of the 3 we traded. I
I agree! Toronto just watched Huerter and Davion play.For one thing Toronto isn’t interested in that return.
Any interest in kelly olynyk?
Any interest in kelly olynyk?
He is terrible on D…..teams routinely attack him in pick and roll. Hard pass because of that side of the ballAny interest in kelly olynyk?
Warriors supposedly see Kuminga as a future star and don’t want to trade him regardless of Siakams‘s contract situation. That should rule the Kings out of any Kuminga talks and good luck Warriors with that relationship.
Makes players like Kuzma at 25 million a year and still signed long term more realistic.
Wash your mouth out with soap!
Why are you so against Kuzma? He’ll be a passable defender when we take the offensive role he has right now from him and can be a switchable defender with Keegan. He’s probably the best player we can get with our assets
Why are you so against Kuzma? He’ll be a passable defender when we take the offensive role he has right now from him and can be a switchable defender with Keegan. He’s probably the best player we can get with our assets
Seeing that the Kings are reportedly only willing to deal, Huerter, HB and Mitchell and some 2nd rounders, I can see Kuzma as a likely trade target for Monte. Seeing that his contract is reasonable for a #3 or #4 on a playoff team, I think he would be an upgrade. Monte has been linked to Kuzma before.
Another player to keep an eye is Charlotte's PJ Washington.
Because trading Barnes for a player who is worse than Barnes and has a bigger contract for an extra year would be very silly.
Agreed with you. Kuzma is better than Barnes.I didn’t know some think Barnes is better then Kuzma I disagree vehemently
I think you have that wrong, Kuzma didn't turn down the Kings. When that trade happened, I remember reading that he was all set to join the Kings and looking forward to it. He also wanted to stay in Cali. But then Lebron and AD insisted that Pelinka make a trade for Westbrook instead of Hield, which is how Kuzma ended up on the Wizards.Washington (Kuzma. I tend to like The Pink Sweater more than most. He has size, good rebounder and passer. Good scorer and better on defense than given credit. Don’t love that he allegedly turned us down for a bigger role on a bad team. I’m not sure i believe it but that makes me nervous)
I think you have that wrong, Kuzma didn't turn down the Kings. When that trade happened, I remember reading that he was all set to join the Kings and looking forward to it. He also wanted to stay in Cali. But then Lebron and AD insisted that Pelinka make a trade for Westbrook instead of Hield, which is how Kuzma ended up on the Wizards.
I didn’t know some think Barnes is better then Kuzma I disagree vehemently
If you look at stats it's an absolute bloodbath. About the only case that can be made for Kuzma is that he's a better rebounder and he's got good assist numbers (on an incredible 31.6% USG). Well, I can tell you he wouldn't sniff those assist numbers in Sac with Fox and Domas dominating the ball. Why would we want to bring in an inefficient shooter with worse defensive stats than Barnes who has never had a USG% under 20% in his life and would likely not relish the role he'd be given? He's a slightly NEGATIVE Win Share player on 31.6% USG. Holy cow, that's not good.
We have a perfectly fine fifth option who can play the role that we need, who spaces the floor with efficient shooting, but since somebody needs to be henpecked he gets singled out by those who don't seem to understand that you're never going to have a team that starts five 20+ PPG guys. He's not a superstar. He doesn't have to be. But he's also not the steaming pile of rancid dog poop that he's being made out to be.
And I can pretty much guarantee that if we were to bring Kuzma in, I know who would be henpecked next. It would be Kuzma. So it goes.
It look a bit like there isn’t any move at this point where you can say THAT IS !!!
It’s must be either some great move we all don’t see , either no move in my opinion ….
All three main players who seems available at this point : LaVine, Siakam , Kuzma are big shot in the blind with highly insecure result …
Maybe the best of them looks like Siakam , where we risk to be left without him after some funny 40sh games ….
I don't think we touch Siakam with a 10 foot pole unless we had some sort of guarantee he'd resign with us. I don't like the contract he wants going forward into the future, and to be honest, I don't think he's the perfect fit, but I think we could make it work. Personally along with Caruso, I would love to acquire Grant from Portland. Doesn't demand the ball! He's a solid defender! and he's a career 39 to 40 percent 3pt shooter.
I don't think we touch Siakam with a 10 foot pole unless we had some sort of guarantee he'd resign with us. I don't like the contract he wants going forward into the future, and to be honest, I don't think he's the perfect fit, but I think we could make it work. Personally along with Caruso, I would love to acquire Grant from Portland. Doesn't demand the ball! He's a solid defender! and he's a career 39 to 40 percent 3pt shooter.