This to me would be worse than them moving to Anaheim. I really don't see Seattle getting an arena done any quicker than Sac could though.
True, but both of those places want teams permanently.I think real danger is that Sac fails to get the financing package in place - soon! If not, all sorts of relocation options are very much front and center. It would force NBAs hand as league has already said current arena is substandard with NCAA already putting ban on its teams holding events in the old run down facility. Even a temporary move to a city with an emply arena like Kansas City or Lousiville could be fall back option with permanent move to Seattle or somewhere else perhaps at a later date.
As much as Sacramento controls its own destiny we're still saddled with the Maloofs who are in pretty much no position to be the owners of the team and their ability or inability to contribute to the new arena will have tons of impact no matter how much public financing is secured.
True, but that will impact the Maloofs more than Sacramento. If you believe what Stern says, that he expects NBA owners to contribute to an arena being built, then the Maloofs are the ones who lose. I would have to believe there are buyers out there who would want to buy the Kings knowing all they have to do to get a new arena is agree to pay rent. PR nightmare for the NBA to let the team walk if Sac does its part.
My heart truly wants to believe that, but I'm not sure my head does.If the Maloofs cannot contribute, they'll be forced out. The NBA isn't just going to just let them walk out on Sacramento when we have a legitimate arena plan in place if the only snag in the plan is the Maloofs.
They'd surely rename them the Sonics so you should rightfully feel disgusted.As a longtime Kingsfan who just moved to Seattle 5 months ago....
...I'm not sure how I feel about this.
They'd surely rename them the Sonics so you should rightfully feel disgusted.
As a longtime Kingsfan who just moved to Seattle 5 months ago....
...I'm not sure how I feel about this.