I mentioned this last year myself.
If you squint hard enough, Lyles is sort of the PF we’d be looking for next to Sabonis. Let’s review his attributes…
- Great size & length (6’9” w/o shoes with a 7’1.5” wingspan & a 9’0” standing reach)
- Good shooter (.363 3P% on 6.9 3PA per 36 min, .446 Corner 3P%, and .815 FT%
- Efficient role playing scorer (16.2 PTS per 36 min and .607 TS%)
- Good rebounder (8.7 REB per 36 min)
- Decent rim protector (0.9 BLK per 36 min)
- Okay defender
- Solid BBIQ
- Got a bit of an edge/toughness to him
In a vacuum, I don’t think he’s a better player than Barnes but I think his fit in the starting lineup (and more importantly next to Sabonis) could have a synergistic effect. He’s definitely much different from Barnes in terms of size/length, rim protection, rebounding, and edge/fire.
Barnes is the better iso scorer which we could take advantage of when Fox and/or Sabonis are off the floor and Barnes’ is matched up with weaker 2nd units. Monk and Barnes would be solid go-to scorers in a 2nd unit to help keep us afloat while Lyles brings some other attributes to the starting unit that we could really use.
You obviously have to sell Barnes on it, but when he was a kid, he did witness a starter level player in Iguodala accept a bench role on his Warriors team helping them win a championship (not to mention that Barnes doesn’t have to worry about being moved to the bench in a contract year).
Barnes needs to come off the bench.
Sasha should take his spot.
Then you can replace Huerter with Duarte.
I think the team would be much better.
I’m as low on Barnes as anyone, but what the heck has Sasha done to take his spot? Lol
Barnes needs to come off the bench.
Sasha should take his spot.
Then you can replace Huerter with Duarte.
I think the team would be much better.
I mean at this point I’m pretty much full on the “Monk as the full time backup PG” train while getting some extra minutes at SG to get him into that 24-30 mpg role, but the pretend GM inside of me would hate to crater Mitchell’s value by benching him.Ruh roh
I mean at this point I’m pretty much full on the “Monk as the full time backup PG” train while getting some extra minutes at SG to get him into that 24-30 mpg role, but the pretend GM inside of me would hate to crater Mitchell’s value by benching him.
We don’t have a pick in the 2024 draft (unless we somehow are bad enough to where our 1st doesn’t convey to ATL). Wondering if there are any teams out there that would be looking to surrender a late 1st for Mitchell’s services?
Barnes is who he is at this point. When everything else is clicking he'll fill in the gaps and contribute but don't expect him to carry the offense or provide vocal leadership. When the team is playing it's worst is often when he's most invisible. I don't know that Lyles (a career backup) or Vezenkov (with 86 minutes played in the NBA to date) is going to be any better for us in the starting lineup given their defensive limitations but moving Barnes into a bench role seems to fit more with who he is at this point in time. The better move might be to put Monk in the starting lineup. At least we know Malik's not going to pass up open shots.
The Blazers will also be without Anfernee Simons, Scoot Henderson, and Time Lord. Shadeon Sharpe might be their best player right now.I want Fox healthy, but I'm honestly kind of glad he's not playing vs POR. I think the core sans Fox needs the opportunity to redeem themselves and get some confidence back.
With how sensitive the league has become, guys are probably reluctant to act on "send a message" plays, because if it happens to look excessive, they know they'll be suspended. Which could hurt the team, already being short handed
Is Davion really that horrible on offense?
He must be shooting 35% on wide open shots from 3pt and not sure what else you really want him to do.
He brings it on defense (although I admit I haven't been paying as much attention on defense this year)
We don’t have a pick in the 2024 draft (unless we somehow are bad enough to where our 1st doesn’t convey to ATL). Wondering if there are any teams out there that would be looking to surrender a late 1st for Mitchell’s services?
Is Davion really that horrible on offense?
He must be shooting 35% on wide open shots from 3pt and not sure what else you really want him to do.
He brings it on defense (although I admit I haven't been paying as much attention on defense this year)
They can layoff him and sag the paint. When he drives he gets blocked even when getting by people. And he doesn't move enough when off the ball.Is Davion really that horrible on offense?
He must be shooting 35% on wide open shots from 3pt and not sure what else you really want him to do.
He brings it on defense (although I admit I haven't been paying as much attention on defense this year)
The stats are not really relevant at the moment. We need a sample size of 20-30 games to conclude anything.Guys....small sample size after getting roasted two games in a row.
Of course the stats are going to be wildly skewed when comparing them to a guy who didn't play the last two games.
They aren't meaningless but they aren't some sort of smoking gun either. We're talking about 6 games.
The stats are not really relevant at the moment. We need a sample size of 20-30 games to conclude anything.
The Blazers will also be without Anfernee Simons, Scoot Henderson, and Time Lord. Shadeon Sharpe might be their best player right now.
If we lose against these Blazers……
Is Davion really that horrible on offense?
He must be shooting 35% on wide open shots from 3pt and not sure what else you really want him to do.
He brings it on defense (although I admit I haven't been paying as much attention on defense this year)
Yeah, hopefully we got the "We're too good to show up for a lesser opponent" bug out of us. Vegas has us as 8 point favorites, even after the whooping Hou put on us.
We're 23 points worse offensively with him with the starters compared to Fox. Not all on him obviously and we can't expect him to compare to Fox... but he certainly hasn't been passable in the slightest. Which is how we got away with it last year when Fox missed 9 games
The stats are not really relevant at the moment. We need a sample size of 20-30 games to conclude anything.