The Kings sucked this bad with Barnes under Joerger without injuries.You have to look at some of the changes around the player as well. It's not a coincidence when you see a difference in effect depending on how the player is used or the position they play. Some players get hot, go on long cold spells. But Walton to his credit has tried a variety of things out but it shouldn't have taken him this long to see the things that were working for most of that time. Let alone let injuries dictate the necessity to do those things.
Am I wrong, or is the love picking up a bit for Barnes?
Barnes is not the problem, has never been the problem, and will not be the problem. D Fox has to shoot FTs and the 3 better, Buddy needs to figure out how to contribute to winning as a starter or be OK with being a flamethrower off the bench, and Bagley needs to get healthy and come back moving the ball and playing D. Then we can get an idea of where this team can go.
I truly believe Buddy is warming up to the 6th man spot, especially since he's generally out there at the END of the game. I just don't get the feeling he's anywhere near as distraught about coming off the bench as some want us to believe.
I would love to re-visit the summer thread we had about Buddy: 1) Is he a 6th man or a starter? 2) Does he deserve starter money?
From where I'm sitting, he's about 25% overpaid. He should be overjoyed at his good fortune. He got major starter's money for bench work. I call that hitting the jackpot.
And that could help him to be good with it also.Isn't part of his contract tied to performance? As long as he can step up and put them in the hoop when it matters the most, I'm good.
Am I wrong, or is the love picking up a bit for Barnes?
I guess all Barnes needed to get his play into gear was look unkempt
Isn't part of his contract tied to performance? As long as he can step up and put them in the hoop when it matters the most, I'm good.
He is scoring more points and at a higher clip; so I think it should help him reach his incentives.Yep. I'm just talking about the $80 mill that is not related to performance. If he's a sub, you look at the $15 mill/year area, a 25% reduction.
With these stories of Buddy's unhappiness starting to surface, I'm really wondering if some of it has to do with the incentives that you mentioned. It could be hard to reach some of these incentives if he's not a starter. So maybe the retort that Grant is saying on the radio - he's got his money, he should just focus on winning - isn't exactly correct.
IMO, Buddy is in his "rightful" position on this team as the potent 6th man. I continue to be skeptical that we've got the 2G starter of the future in Bogs. Lastly, Bazemore is a perfect stop-gap at the 2G. If he's not a legit starter at the 2G, then he's at least a part of one. I sure hope they sign him up for two to three years.
After the AS break I thought HB and a Bjelly both ran like young coltsPre-all star break, he looked physically cooked with tired legs. After all star break he looks fresher.
He is scoring more points and at a higher clip; so I think it should help him reach his incentives.
If it is a minute reduction, I get some of it. But his D was so bad and he kept making dumb turnovers he should start by being critical towards himself before he starts blaming others (if that is the case).