Is John Salmons a "Most Improved Player" contender?...

Is John Salmons a "most improved player" contender?


  • Total voters
    67
without a doubt. he's almost tripled his career avg in ppg so far this season, doubled the rebounds and added an extra assist and steal per game, all while shooting over 50% from the field and 41% from the 3 (both around an 7% increase). i don't know who else would be in the running, or what they've done this season, but john's name should at least be mentioned.
 
No doubt John is having a "most improved" type year. However, I was reading the first trimester awards by Marc Stein and he stated that according to the leagues guidelines for most improved player consideration it is "designed to honor an up and coming player." John, in his sixth year may be past this definition.

Stein does mention Beno in this category, but I think Rudy Gay is almost a shoe in if he continues to play the way he is for the Grizz.

Article Link: http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/columns/story?columnist=stein_marc&page=FirstTrimesterReport-080104
 
Both Salmons and Beno are candidates to be sure. Whether they have legit shots will depend obviously on whether they start the rest of the season or get returned to the bench. They will have a lot of competition anyway, as usual. Gay, Aldridge, Ronnie Brewer, maybe Hedo etc.
 
Yeah, I think they are candidates(Beno, John), but once Kevin, Mike and Ron are back in the starting lineup, that will pretty much kill their chances of having a shot to beat the other guys...I think Gay or Aldridge will get it.
 
I think he certainly should be considered. Bobby Simmons won the MIP a few years back, in his fourth year in the league. Jalen Rose won the award in his sixth year. At this time, however, I'd consider Rudy Gay and LaMarcus Aldridge for the award over Salmons. Other than those three, I'd also consider Hedo Turkoglu and Mike Dunleavy.
 
Definitely shall be in the talks, but I'd have to say that once Bibby, Martin, and Artest come back, how he shall take his role with undoubtedly increased minutes. Even if anyone gets traded, though, I doubt he would win--there's LaMarcus Aldridge out there, and in my book he's probably the winner--he seems to have made the jump from spot player to franchise player in one year.
 
I have to agree, as well as put Garcia on that list as well. Garcia has more than doubled his output on the scoring end, and increased rebounds, steals, and FG/3PT%. He is doing this w/ only about 10 more minutes a game on avg.
 
John Absolutely should be in the running...also Jose Calderon could be another good candidate along with those others mentioned.
 
At this point, John must be in the discussion as a contender. The question remains, of course, if it will continue when he comes off the bench. If he can get his head right, coming off the bench shouldn't matter. It should be all about continuing to earn minutes, whenever they come. Keep it up, John!
 
No doubt John is having a "most improved" type year. However, I was reading the first trimester awards by Marc Stein and he stated that according to the leagues guidelines for most improved player consideration it is "designed to honor an up and coming player." John, in his sixth year may be past this definition.
Well, Bobby Jackson was in his 6th year when he won. Of course, he was a major contributor to a much better team.

I think John at least has to be part of the discussion. He's earned that much.
 
Well, Bobby Jackson was in his 6th year when he won. Of course, he was a major contributor to a much better team.

I think John at least has to be part of the discussion. He's earned that much.

did bobby win MIP also? i thought he won sixth man.
 
He certainly seems a candidate for the MIP, but Brick is right, the competition is great this year. Good Luck John! Annie.
 
Is he a contender? Yes. Will he win it? Probably not. Rudy Gay, Hedo, Andrew Bynum, and Aldridge in Portland are serious frontrunners. If Martin didn't win it last season, then I don't see how Salmons can take it, even though he deserves it.
 
i wish 2nd or 3rd year players werent eligible for the award..almost everybody improves from their rookie season


Well that's kind of the point though -- its a celebration fo the emerging players in the league. It would be a pretty drab award if you were only giving it out to guys in their late 20s -- John's situation is quite rare. Very few guys get significantly better after about 25 or so. Most years you'd probably have some average vet who jumped from 9ppg to 13ppg winning the award.
 
Back
Top