I know most of this is already public knowledge, but some of the more absurd aspects:
-the Kings want to keep 100% of food, beverage, and merchandising expenses, but don't want to be responsible for game-day operating costs. This is insane- if they want to not bear the operating costs they have to give up the revenue. Otherwise it's basically asking the city/AEG to give up a ton of money for literally nothing in return.
-the insistence on control over naming rights to the arena and other branding is patently absurd given that they just gave Power Balance the naming rights to Arco. Power Balance! I think this is codeword for, we get to choose the name, and it's going to be the highest bidder, regardless of how classless and stupid it is.
-asking for no taxes/not to pay for city game-day services (i.e., police and traffic) is just stupid. Demanding more money from the city for nothing.
My take on this is that the NBA used a template that all other teams basically follow in agreements with cities and that these terms are more or less boilerplate. The Kings want as much money as possible and refuse to agree to even the most basic fair principles.
And what's most damning: Page 13, "Team Transfer." The city and the NBA agreed that the terms would be binding on any new owner; the Kings want the terms to be negotiable (non-binding) for a new owner. And what's the biggest term that would affect the sale of the team? The ability to relocate, obviously. The Maloofs want to be able to flip the team to an out-of-towner who wants to relocate, which is consistent with their desire to reduce the length of the lease to 15 years from 30.
TL;DR: Maloofs want the City, the NBA, and AEG to give them money hand over fist beyond what other teams have gotten in similar deals. The Maloofs also don't want to commit long-term to Sacramento, and want to give any potential buyers the right to move the team ASAP (even before the arena is completed, presumably).