i think this is almost all we need to know. for a team in transition, the kings are a fairly respectable 17-19 with cousins/gay/thomas in the lineup, with a fairly respectable point differential, to boot. but the kings are a staggering 0-10 without cousins in the lineup, with a massive difference in point differential between when he plays and when he doesn't. to me, this sample squashes the oft-repeated argument that you cannot build a winner around demarcus cousins. when he's on the court with a talented running mate, the kings win almost as much as they lose, which means something for a team that hasn't finished above .350 since 2008. without demarcus cousins, well... the kings simply lose. i'd say he has a rather tremendous impact on the outcomes of games, wouldn't you?