I haven't read this whole thread, so I apologize if this has been gone over before, but Cleveland owes its 2019 pick to Atlanta and due to the Stepien rule (coincidentally) would not be able to trade their own first rounder this year.
I haven't read this whole thread, so I apologize if this has been gone over before, but Cleveland owes its 2019 pick to Atlanta and due to the Stepien rule (coincidentally) would not be able to trade their own first rounder this year.
They can trade one, but not both.I haven't read this whole thread, so I apologize if this has been gone over before, but Cleveland owes its 2019 pick to Atlanta and due to the Stepien rule (coincidentally) would not be able to trade their own first rounder this year.
Well I whole heartedly disagree with that regarding the 1st. We should sit back and wait until Cle caves. Because we can. If Cle continues to free fall and fight amongst themselves the pressure will continue to build for them aka leverage. Worst case scenario for us is Hill plays out his contract and we have major expiring deals next year.
The interview Windhorst gave last week didn't convince me he was really in tune with the trade rumor. There are a lot of Narratives being swung here and the LBJ/BSPN connection can't be ignored. Stay the course and demand a 1st for Hill with no youth attached or no deal.Brian Windhorst provides an update on the George Hill trade the Cavs and Kings discussed: “Well, obviously it hasn’t gotten done, they haven’t been able to finalize it. It is still sitting there on the table, but the teams have backed away from it. Why? Well, there a few different reasons for that. There’s a draft compensation issue. There’s the George Hill health issue. He missed three of four games [recently]. And I know they aren’t playing their veterans, but he had the toe issue pop up earlier this month and he’s been battling this toe issue for two years now. He’s missed six of his last [11] games – some because of the toe and some because he’s been a healthy scratch. I do think there was some concern within the Cavs organization about that. … Also, another factor is the Cavs’ lineup change. They hadn’t been using Channing Frye at all and so I think the GM, Koby Altman, was like, ‘Well if you aren’t going to use him, I’m going to trade him.’ Then they made a lineup change and now Channing Frye is back in the rotation. Had they done this deal the way it was initially structured, they would’ve been a big man short, which would have necessitated them to make a secondary deal. From what I understand, it’s still there and can be done, but for various reasons the teams have stepped back. The reason I was so [adamant] that it was going to happen is because they talked to the players about it. When it’s the actual team [executives] going to the players and saying, ‘This is going to happen,’ typically that means it’s going to happen.”
He also says Vince is a buyout candidate, and Kings want a 1st rd for Skal
Link is to a podcast - reported on Hoopshype
https://audioboom.com/posts/6625362...d-the-league-buyout-candidates-and-more-ep-53
Brian Windhorst provides an update on the George Hill trade the Cavs and Kings discussed: “Well, obviously it hasn’t gotten done, they haven’t been able to finalize it. It is still sitting there on the table, but the teams have backed away from it. Why? Well, there a few different reasons for that. There’s a draft compensation issue. There’s the George Hill health issue. He missed three of four games [recently]. And I know they aren’t playing their veterans, but he had the toe issue pop up earlier this month and he’s been battling this toe issue for two years now. He’s missed six of his last [11] games – some because of the toe and some because he’s been a healthy scratch. I do think there was some concern within the Cavs organization about that. … Also, another factor is the Cavs’ lineup change. They hadn’t been using Channing Frye at all and so I think the GM, Koby Altman, was like, ‘Well if you aren’t going to use him, I’m going to trade him.’ Then they made a lineup change and now Channing Frye is back in the rotation. Had they done this deal the way it was initially structured, they would’ve been a big man short, which would have necessitated them to make a secondary deal. From what I understand, it’s still there and can be done, but for various reasons the teams have stepped back. The reason I was so [adamant] that it was going to happen is because they talked to the players about it. When it’s the actual team [executives] going to the players and saying, ‘This is going to happen,’ typically that means it’s going to happen.”
He also says Vince is a buyout candidate, and Kings want a 1st rd for Skal
Link is to a podcast - reported on Hoopshype
https://audioboom.com/posts/6625362...d-the-league-buyout-candidates-and-more-ep-53
Brian Windhorst provides an update on the George Hill trade the Cavs and Kings discussed: “Well, obviously it hasn’t gotten done, they haven’t been able to finalize it. It is still sitting there on the table, but the teams have backed away from it. Why? Well, there a few different reasons for that. There’s a draft compensation issue. There’s the George Hill health issue. He missed three of four games [recently]. And I know they aren’t playing their veterans, but he had the toe issue pop up earlier this month and he’s been battling this toe issue for two years now. He’s missed six of his last [11] games – some because of the toe and some because he’s been a healthy scratch. I do think there was some concern within the Cavs organization about that. … Also, another factor is the Cavs’ lineup change. They hadn’t been using Channing Frye at all and so I think the GM, Koby Altman, was like, ‘Well if you aren’t going to use him, I’m going to trade him.’ Then they made a lineup change and now Channing Frye is back in the rotation. Had they done this deal the way it was initially structured, they would’ve been a big man short, which would have necessitated them to make a secondary deal. From what I understand, it’s still there and can be done, but for various reasons the teams have stepped back. The reason I was so [adamant] that it was going to happen is because they talked to the players about it. When it’s the actual team [executives] going to the players and saying, ‘This is going to happen,’ typically that means it’s going to happen.”
He also says Vince is a buyout candidate, and Kings want a 1st rd for Skal
Link is to a podcast - reported on Hoopshype
https://audioboom.com/posts/6625362...d-the-league-buyout-candidates-and-more-ep-53
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nb...nnot-afford-to-trade-channing-frye/ar-BBIwn87
With Love out, Frye becomes too important to cavs to trade him
So back to drawing board?
Shumpert and JR Smith, Cavs 1st
for Hill and Malachi?
or
Shumpert, JR, Bkln pick
for Hill and Skal
To take back that much salary I would want a pick
still a very bad deal
2 guards we dont need for 2 guards we dont need
still a very expensive pick 41 mil for 21 mil ?
cavs wont trade Bkn unless for DeAndre Jordan for TT deal?
I just dont see any Hill trade working
There's no need to give up Richardson or Labissiere. It should be...https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nb...nnot-afford-to-trade-channing-frye/ar-BBIwn87
With Love out, Frye becomes too important to cavs to trade him
So back to drawing board?
Shumpert and JR Smith, Cavs 1st
for Hill and Malachi?
or
Shumpert, JR, Bkln pick
for Hill and Skal
To take back that much salary I would want a pick
still a very bad deal
2 guards we dont need for 2 guards we dont need
still a very expensive pick 41 mil for 21 mil ?
cavs wont trade Bkn unless for DeAndre Jordan for TT deal?
I just dont see any Hill trade working
Soooo only reason I see Vince as a buyout would be if we need to clear roster spot for Hill trade
Nobody will give us a 1st for Skal
If Cleveland is so worried about trading Frye and being a Big man down, then they can give us the BKN 1st for Skal - LOL like that will happen (and Vlade should not take CLE 1st for skal )
There's no need to give up Richardson or Labissiere. It should be...
Kings Get: JR Smith, Iman Shumpert, CLE 2018 1st, & rights to swap w/ BKN 2018 1st
Cavs Get: George Hill & Kosta Koufos
PG - Hill / Thomas / Calderon / Rose
SG - Korver / Wade
SF - LeBron / Crowder / Osman
PF - Love / Green / Frye
C - Thompson / Koufos / Zizic
or
Kings Get: JR Smith, Iman Shumpert, CLE 2018 1st, & rights to swap w/ BKN 2018 1st
Cavs Get: George Hill & Garrett Temple
PG - Hill / Thomas / Calderon / Rose
SG - Temple / Wade / Korver
SF - LeBron / Korver / Osman
PF - Crowder / Green / Frye
C - Love / Thompson / Zizic
I would suggest reading my proposal again. They aren't trading us the BKN pick in what I proposed.Brooklyn pick isn’t available man
https://twitter.com/WindhorstESPN/status/958780324883857409The whole thing about Hill's toe reeks of BS. Everyone knows that he's been healthy for 99% of the games he's missed this season. This is just the Cavs trying to justify the trade failure.
https://twitter.com/WindhorstESPN/status/958780324883857409
"On the @hoopshype podcast this week I misspoke and said George Hill had recently missed time due to a toe injury. This was my mistake, he recently missed time because of the birth of a child. His toe has been healthy this season. I apologize for the error." -Brian Windhorst
This is why I don't attribute much merit into anything I read from sports journalists and talking heads. Unless it is an indisputable fact it makes more sense (and is better for my overall health) to err on the side of caution and take a wait and see approach to all these rumors we hear almost daily.
@ESPNCleveland: Windhorst: The #Cavs/Sacramento trade is not dead, there's still a chance it happens for George Hill.
KK played so great his last game this is the most perfect "sell high" opportunity we're going to get. Not that I'm anxious to see him go because we are already too small.I like to think that Hill wants to leave but doesn’t want to lose money next year to do it and who would.
I believe we paid him to cover a need and he has. But that money could very well be spent on what we need next year after we see how we draft.
I think what ever we get that does not tie up cap space could work out well for us.
Now KK as a trade is so-so to me but love just broke his hand and should be back rested for the playoffs. We know what we have with him and heck a lot of teams would like a OK backup center.
After learning that Cleveland can't trade their first round pick....I don't know what the point is in even talking to them. Any trade at that point is going to be a favor to George Hill and the Cavs.
They can trade their pick just not both without one of them being a pick swap. At least that's how I understand it.I seem to have missed that. Why can't Cleveland trade their first-round pick? They have the BRK pick this year, so I don't see a Stepien Rule problem.
After learning that Cleveland can't trade their first round pick....I don't know what the point is in even talking to them. Any trade at that point is going to be a favor to George Hill and the Cavs.
I seem to have missed that. Why can't Cleveland trade their first-round pick? They have the BRK pick this year, so I don't see a Stepien Rule problem.