Free agency mega thread 2025 edition!

That’s not a good thing his sorry ass should fit in the mle now we’re gonna lose someone like monk for him poverty franchise

I will eat crow if I am wrong, but how did you go from it "might be a sign and trade" to "losing Monk" for a Schroeder sign and trade? Nothing said anything about losing Monk. In fact, a lot of sign and trades are done with nothing (except a heavily protected/distant second round pick, or rights to some guy that was drafted 6 years ago and is still overseas) going back to the other team. The sign and trade is usually a solid for the other team so that they can create a trade exception.

Maybe I am totally wrong, but jumping to total speculation that we are trading Monk for Schroeder seems totally bonkers to me.
 
I will eat crow if I am wrong, but how did you go from it "might be a sign and trade" to "losing Monk" for a Schroeder sign and trade? Nothing said anything about losing Monk. In fact, a lot of sign and trades are done with nothing (except a heavily protected/distant second round pick, or rights to some guy that was drafted 6 years ago and is still overseas) going back to the other team. The sign and trade is usually a solid for the other team so that they can create a trade exception.

Maybe I am totally wrong, but jumping to total speculation that we are trading Monk for Schroeder seems totally bonkers to me.

I mean one of our guards have to go


Monk is levels better than Westbrick and Schroeder what are we doing here
 
I mean one of our guards have to go



Monk is levels better than Westbrick and Schroeder what are we doing here
If it is Monk for Schroeder that is terrible. Like "what the hell are we doing" levels of terrible. But that isn't what anyone said. It says Schroeder will be a sign and trade. Separately, it says Monk will be the odd man out. I still think it is probably a Schroeder for second round pick sign and trade that allows Detroit to create a TPE and allows us to keep our MLE intact. Then, I would assume we would acquire some other asset for Monk in a separate trade. So I think the appropriate question will be is whether we would rather have Monk or rather have Schroeder plus the additional asset.

And if I am wrong, and it is Schroder for Monk, I agree that it is terrible.
 
If it is Monk for Schroeder that is terrible. Like "what the hell are we doing" levels of terrible. But that isn't what anyone said. It says Schroeder will be a sign and trade. Separately, it says Monk will be the odd man out. I still think it is probably a Schroeder for second round pick sign and trade that allows Detroit to create a TPE and allows us to keep our MLE intact. Then, I would assume we would acquire some other asset for Monk in a separate trade. So I think the appropriate question will be is whether we would rather have Monk or rather have Schroeder plus the additional asset.

And if I am wrong, and it is Schroder for Monk, I agree that it is terrible.

So we’re giving up assets for a downgrade hoping we get more for monk in a separate trade either way it’s idiotic we’re not OKC/houston we don’t have picks to be throwing away while not making the playoffs
 
Back
Top