No it’s entirely on Monte for trading for him by sending a 2028 second-round pick to Memphis and Alex Len and Colby Jones to Washington. So we could make the ****ing playin.
Monte was every bit as dumb as I said he was.
Not sure why people like him, I wouldnt want him anywhere near my team.I wonder if Beef Stew is available again
Saw that coming after the video interview.
Radio saying Dennis may be a sign and trade????
Guessing we give a second so we can fit him into our trade exceptionThat’s not a good thing his sorry ass should fit in the mle now we’re gonna lose someone like monk for him poverty franchise
That’s not a good thing his sorry ass should fit in the mle now we’re gonna lose someone like monk for him poverty franchise
That’s not a good thing his sorry ass should fit in the mle now we’re gonna lose someone like monk for him poverty franchise
Softening the blow?
Softening the blow?
I will eat crow if I am wrong, but how did you go from it "might be a sign and trade" to "losing Monk" for a Schroeder sign and trade? Nothing said anything about losing Monk. In fact, a lot of sign and trades are done with nothing (except a heavily protected/distant second round pick, or rights to some guy that was drafted 6 years ago and is still overseas) going back to the other team. The sign and trade is usually a solid for the other team so that they can create a trade exception.
Maybe I am totally wrong, but jumping to total speculation that we are trading Monk for Schroeder seems totally bonkers to me.
I mean one of our guards have to go
Monk is levels better than Westbrick and Schroeder what are we doing here
Chavano Rainer looks lile a competent player on the Warriors, think how Monk will play there.If it’s in a sign and trade for Kuminga I’m all for it
Chavano Rainer looks lile a competent player on the Warriors, think how Monk will play there.
If it is Monk for Schroeder that is terrible. Like "what the hell are we doing" levels of terrible. But that isn't what anyone said. It says Schroeder will be a sign and trade. Separately, it says Monk will be the odd man out. I still think it is probably a Schroeder for second round pick sign and trade that allows Detroit to create a TPE and allows us to keep our MLE intact. Then, I would assume we would acquire some other asset for Monk in a separate trade. So I think the appropriate question will be is whether we would rather have Monk or rather have Schroeder plus the additional asset.I mean one of our guards have to go
Monk is levels better than Westbrick and Schroeder what are we doing here
If it is Monk for Schroeder that is terrible. Like "what the hell are we doing" levels of terrible. But that isn't what anyone said. It says Schroeder will be a sign and trade. Separately, it says Monk will be the odd man out. I still think it is probably a Schroeder for second round pick sign and trade that allows Detroit to create a TPE and allows us to keep our MLE intact. Then, I would assume we would acquire some other asset for Monk in a separate trade. So I think the appropriate question will be is whether we would rather have Monk or rather have Schroeder plus the additional asset.
And if I am wrong, and it is Schroder for Monk, I agree that it is terrible.
I don't see huge upside.I’m not worried about the Warriors. I just want the Kings to improve and accumulate talent. Kuminga has huge upside
Warriors fans also once claimed Buddy was going to be better than Klay Thompson.I don't see huge upside.
This is what some Warriors fans say . . .
Honestly, this is a good move. Garza at that price vs. Kornet? Heck yeah.