QWERTYLICIOUS
Starter
Ummm...You do realize I was just joking, right?Jeezus. I prefer some continuity. I just don't understand this knee jerk garbage right now.
Ummm...You do realize I was just joking, right?Jeezus. I prefer some continuity. I just don't understand this knee jerk garbage right now.
The key here is "at some point"...Which I agree with you should the first half of your statement hold up to be true.
..."at some point" is just not now.
See my response to @PorchSurfin...![]()
I was not referring to you, for what it's worth.Ummm...You do realize I was just joking, right?
You'd hope we'd be able to figure something out by then, so, yes, if this team is not a fringe contender by then, I will be all for it.two more seasons from now?
Ah, gotcha. Well, apologies for the misunderstanding...With that being said, I do agree with your initial assessment...But, as I also said in an earlier post...Welcome to KingsFans.com...I was not referring to you, for what it's worth.
2nd most successful coach in Sacramento history is such a low bar, that it really shouldn't weigh much into an evaluation.
If he hovers between say 43 and 49 wins and never gets out of the 1st round, I'd be surprised if they don't go another direction at some point
I'm glad my three smiley faces are worth something...I did realize. I think it was the three smiley faces that gave it away.
I kind of see Mike Brown as the guy who gets us back to the playoffs (consistently), maybe gets us to be a 2nd round/WCF team (consistently), but who will ultimately need to be let go to bring in someone else who will be able to get us over that final hurdle, and hopefully contend for a championship.How quickly we've forgotten what this org looked like before Mike Brown. Idk how anyone thinks we could fire a coach like him after 2 years and not end up with a nuclear trainwreck
two more seasons from now?
I kind of see Mike Brown as the guy who gets us back to the playoffs (consistently), maybe gets us to be a 2nd round/WCF team (consistently), but who will ultimately need to be let go to bring in someone else who will be able to get us over that final hurdle, and hopefully contend for a championship.
The bolded part of your post is pretty much what I despise about today's NBA...Even if threes are not falling, teams still tend to jack them up at such an insane rate. I would much rather a team, as soon as they realize that they're even gonna struggle to hit the broad side of the barn, kind of pull back on the long-range game, and start going inside a little more.I think has done a hell of a job and pushes the right button way more often than the wrong one. He transformed our culture in year one and then turned us into a top 14 defense (top 8 after the break). Think about our history for a minute and then think about how big of a deal that is.
I agree that the threes can get annoying but here’s a thought, how about we start making them at a higher clip? We need a bit more consistency out of our shooters next season.
I think he gets next year as a "freebie", even if we regress and then year 4 is when that seat starts to get warm. If you don't see actual growth by the end of year 4, it's probably just not working out.
But that's a logical way to map out a coach with a franchise. Firing him after 2 seasons, with 2 of the best win totals we've had in 16 years, is insanity. This past year was our SIXTH best year in franchise history! Think about that for a second.
Agreed.Sure maybe. But you give him years to see what he can do. Maybe he gets a chip, maybe the talent isn't there. But that's a year 4 decision not year 2, ESPECIALLY in Sacramento. We'd never get a good candidate if we fired him.
Lol, this season was Western Conference Championship or bust apparently. As if that was even realistic for a franchise that hadn't been in the playoffs for a record 2 decades lol. This whole thread reeksI think he gets next year as a "freebie", even if we regress and then year 4 is when that seat starts to get warm. If you don't see actual growth by the end of year 4, it's probably just not working out.
But that's a logical way to map out a coach with a franchise. Firing him after 2 seasons, with 2 of the best win totals we've had in 16 years, is insanity. This past year was our SIXTH best year in franchise history! Think about that for a second.
How quickly we've forgotten what this org looked like before Mike Brown. Idk how anyone thinks we could fire a coach like him after 2 years and not end up with a nuclear trainwreck
I think he gets next year as a "freebie", even if we regress and then year 4 is when that seat starts to get warm. If you don't see actual growth by the end of year 4, it's probably just not working out.
But that's a logical way to map out a coach with a franchise. Firing him after 2 seasons, with 2 of the best win totals we've had in 16 years, is insanity. This past year was our SIXTH best year in franchise history! Think about that for a second.
At times, it feels, and has felt, as if this season was NBA Champions or bust apparently.Lol, this season was Western Conference Championship or bust apparently. As if that was even realistic for a franchise that hadn't been in the playoffs for a record 2 decades lol. This whole thread reeks
Ditto.Lol, this season was Western Conference Championship or bust apparently. As if that was even realistic for a franchise that hadn't been in the playoffs for a record 2 decades lol. This whole thread reeks
At times, it feels, and has felt, as if this season was NBA Champions or bust apparently.
If this situation was with another team who has had more winning seasons, would your evaluation of him be different?
If he doesn’t make the playoffs next year then I think he’s out as HC. Sabonis and Fox are too talented not to be in the playoffs. Missing the playoffs this year sucked, but there’s no excuse for next year barring any major injuryI think he gets next year as a "freebie", even if we regress and then year 4 is when that seat starts to get warm. If you don't see actual growth by the end of year 4, it's probably just not working out.
But that's a logical way to map out a coach with a franchise. Firing him after 2 seasons, with 2 of the best win totals we've had in 16 years, is insanity. This past year was our SIXTH best year in franchise history! Think about that for a second.
No, because I think he's done an excellent job as a coach and good coaches deserve plenty of rope and opportunity to see their plan/vision for the team through. He's proven step 1 (win games). Step 2 is now how he takes this team to the next level to win a playoff series and make an actual playoff run.
If you prove step 1, you deserve the chance to prove step 2. Just in my personal opinion, that SHOULD start to show out by the end of year 4. If we're stuck in mud, or regressing, by then, that's when you consider a change.
I put $10 down on the Kings winning the championship. It was a silly thing to do, but it was about as silly of a thing to think would ever happen too.At times, it feels, and has felt, as if this season was NBA Champions or bust apparently.
Ditto.
If he doesn’t make the playoffs next year then I think he’s out as HC. Sabonis and Fox are too talented not to be in the playoffs. Missing the playoffs this year sucked, but there’s no excuse for next year barring any major injury